Comments on: iGTD2: Ambitious but Too Early http://gigaom.com/collaboration/igtd-ambitious-but-too-early/ Fri, 25 May 2012 07:31:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: I don't get http://gigaom.com/collaboration/igtd-ambitious-but-too-early/#comment-67298 Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:26:25 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/02/igtd-ambitious-but-too-early/#comment-67298 I don’t get iGTD2 yet. What happened to the inbox. The whole POINT of GTD relies on an inbox. With v2, it seems like the inbox has lost its use. And this doesn’t seem to work well with the GTD philosophy.

]]> By: Nick | PTO http://gigaom.com/collaboration/igtd-ambitious-but-too-early/#comment-67297 Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:48:42 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/02/igtd-ambitious-but-too-early/#comment-67297 I agree — iGTD has some way to go to match up to Things and OmniFocus.

I did a showdown of top OSX Task Managers that some may find useful.

]]> By: Fokke Kooistra http://gigaom.com/collaboration/igtd-ambitious-but-too-early/#comment-67296 Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:49:32 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/02/igtd-ambitious-but-too-early/#comment-67296 Thank you for your post. Real common sense!

I love to ‘play’ with new and updated GTD tools on my Mac. But I agree with you on this one. Sometimes playing is fun and I do that a lot. But I always keep in mind that a trusted system is very, very important.

I sure will be following iGTD, it is very powerful.

Fokke

]]>