<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grouptivity: Using the Social Web to Build Consensus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:04:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: imparare</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imparare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting comments.. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trama</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ich erklare meinen Freunden uber diese Seite. Interessieren!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ich erklare meinen Freunden uber diese Seite. Interessieren!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libera</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[libera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;am really impressed!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;am really impressed!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library clips</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Library clips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 02:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Email collaboration re-visited (forum add-on, 9cays and Grouptivity)&lt;/strong&gt;

	I while back I contributed a post to the messiness of email collaboration meme, Michael Sampson distilled the meme into 11 issues. I further responded with a more focused post on using email for document collaboration.
	Anyway Michael has now taken us...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Email collaboration re-visited (forum add-on, 9cays and Grouptivity)</strong></p>
<p>	I while back I contributed a post to the messiness of email collaboration meme, Michael Sampson distilled the meme into 11 issues. I further responded with a more focused post on using email for document collaboration.<br />
	Anyway Michael has now taken us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Catch up on web tools :: January :: 2007</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Library clips :: Catch up on web tools :: January :: 2007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Grouptivity - a system where you can manage contacts into groups and email participants with form like templates [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grouptivity &#8211; a system where you can manage contacts into groups and email participants with form like templates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Invitations &#171; My Life With IT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Online Invitations &#171; My Life With IT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Online&#160;Invitations   Published December 30th, 2006   Technology , Web , Programming , Software      I have tried using Evite in the past. I think it is easier than sending emails to everyone and getting a thread of returned emails and after 4 such reply to all emails, everyone&#8217;s lost on the venue, time and who&#8217;s going list. There is another such site by Grouptivity. Maybe I can try using it and see how the response is for my next attempt at organising an event. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Online&nbsp;Invitations   Published December 30th, 2006   Technology , Web , Programming , Software      I have tried using Evite in the past. I think it is easier than sending emails to everyone and getting a thread of returned emails and after 4 such reply to all emails, everyone&#8217;s lost on the venue, time and who&#8217;s going list. There is another such site by Grouptivity. Maybe I can try using it and see how the response is for my next attempt at organising an event. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankesh Kumar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ankesh Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jay/Judy, point well taken, we&#039;re putting up a blog this weekend. We&#039;re a little humble and not sure people want to know about us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay/Judy, point well taken, we&#8217;re putting up a blog this weekend. We&#8217;re a little humble and not sure people want to know about us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh wow. I didn&#039;t initially read the end of this blog post where Judi mentions the same thing about lack of information on the founders. My apologies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow. I didn&#8217;t initially read the end of this blog post where Judi mentions the same thing about lack of information on the founders. My apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It always amazes me how companies launch without any info about the founders or a company blog so we can track how they have updated over time. Despite this, i think that they are attempting to attack a need, but the execution needs to be streamlined a little bit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always amazes me how companies launch without any info about the founders or a company blog so we can track how they have updated over time. Despite this, i think that they are attempting to attack a need, but the execution needs to be streamlined a little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankesh Kumar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ankesh Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judi, thanks very much for the article, a lot of your comments and suggestions are correct and we are working towards them and a whole lot more.

Michael, I think there is more there than just planning meetings and would be happy to speak to you to give you an overview of where we are and what else we have planned.

Patrick, I think the company you are referring to was Firedrop, then Zaplet, who subsequently were acquired by Metricstream.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judi, thanks very much for the article, a lot of your comments and suggestions are correct and we are working towards them and a whole lot more.</p>
<p>Michael, I think there is more there than just planning meetings and would be happy to speak to you to give you an overview of where we are and what else we have planned.</p>
<p>Patrick, I think the company you are referring to was Firedrop, then Zaplet, who subsequently were acquired by Metricstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Essentially this same thing was done back in 1999-2000, though I cannot remember the name of the service. An interesting component of that service was that the original email stayed in your inbox, and was changed to &quot;unread&quot; after the details changed. Say you&#039;re planning a dinner out with friends. A friend receives the email and clicks to view it, and its marked as read. The first friend replies within the email and goes onto other things. A second friend sees the email after the first has replied, and that person&#039;s response (survey and/or text), and replies as well. The first friend comes back to their inbox, and the message is again marked as unread, and has been updated with the second friend&#039;s response.

It was an extremely well implemented product, but never seemed to get off the ground. I wish I could remember the name.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Essentially this same thing was done back in 1999-2000, though I cannot remember the name of the service. An interesting component of that service was that the original email stayed in your inbox, and was changed to &#8220;unread&#8221; after the details changed. Say you&#8217;re planning a dinner out with friends. A friend receives the email and clicks to view it, and its marked as read. The first friend replies within the email and goes onto other things. A second friend sees the email after the first has replied, and that person&#8217;s response (survey and/or text), and replies as well. The first friend comes back to their inbox, and the message is again marked as unread, and has been updated with the second friend&#8217;s response.</p>
<p>It was an extremely well implemented product, but never seemed to get off the ground. I wish I could remember the name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judi Sohn</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judi Sohn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea shows promise. The implementation needs work. Its strength is that you can build the survey right into the email and you have all your answers in one place without the chatter. They have to work out the bugs to make it really usable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea shows promise. The implementation needs work. Its strength is that you can build the survey right into the email and you have all your answers in one place without the chatter. They have to work out the bugs to make it really usable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael arrington</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael arrington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you say this is easier than planning a meeting manually? Looks like a horrific process unless I&#039;m missing something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you say this is easier than planning a meeting manually? Looks like a horrific process unless I&#8217;m missing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Grouptivity, better than email?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; Grouptivity, better than email?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2006/12/28/grouptivity-using-the-social-web-to-build-consensus/#comment-53109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and group email decision making. And it gets the thumbs up from Web Worker Daily.    Share/Send  Sphere Topic: Reporter&#039;s Log Tags:Grouptivity [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and group email decision making. And it gets the thumbs up from Web Worker Daily.    Share/Send  Sphere Topic: Reporter&#8217;s Log Tags:Grouptivity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

