<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Visual Searches, Try a Few Different Approaches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/for-visual-searches-try-a-few-different-approaches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/for-visual-searches-try-a-few-different-approaches/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:54:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/for-visual-searches-try-a-few-different-approaches/#comment-87334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=19393#comment-87334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Bing is really picking up quick marketshare through these different techniques. Google is still the most dominant search engine but I think Bing has decided to go down another route and not compete for the traditional search engine client.
Good article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bing is really picking up quick marketshare through these different techniques. Google is still the most dominant search engine but I think Bing has decided to go down another route and not compete for the traditional search engine client.<br />
Good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdZone</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/for-visual-searches-try-a-few-different-approaches/#comment-87333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdZone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=19393#comment-87333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to see that Bing is trying a few new techniques.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see that Bing is trying a few new techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/for-visual-searches-try-a-few-different-approaches/#comment-87332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=19393#comment-87332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank for informative post. It was good to know this feature, I do use Google`s image search lot.

Thank you
Ken]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank for informative post. It was good to know this feature, I do use Google`s image search lot.</p>
<p>Thank you<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/for-visual-searches-try-a-few-different-approaches/#comment-87331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=19393#comment-87331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[neat to see Bing actually doing some new and interesting stuff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neat to see Bing actually doing some new and interesting stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

