<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flock Ships the Social Browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/flock-ships-the-social-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/flock-ships-the-social-browser/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/flock-ships-the-social-browser/#comment-65500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/05/flock-ships-the-social-browser/#comment-65500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, this comment isn&#039;t about Flock - it&#039;s about a statement you made in the article.

In the article, you refer to Adblock Plus as one of your &quot;essential extensions.&quot; As somebody who presumably makes a living writing for ad-supported webstes it doesn&#039;t really seem right.  I understand if you&#039;re just using it to block the really annoying pop-ups &amp; layer ads, but if you&#039;re blocking all ads while making a living from showing ads to other people it seems less than perfectly honest, (I can&#039;t really find the right word to go there - but I think you get the point).

This is something that I&#039;d like to hear more on - perhaps you could even write an article on it.  If you feel this comment is too off-topic, go ahead and delete it - I won&#039;t be offended.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, this comment isn&#8217;t about Flock &#8211; it&#8217;s about a statement you made in the article.</p>
<p>In the article, you refer to Adblock Plus as one of your &#8220;essential extensions.&#8221; As somebody who presumably makes a living writing for ad-supported webstes it doesn&#8217;t really seem right.  I understand if you&#8217;re just using it to block the really annoying pop-ups &amp; layer ads, but if you&#8217;re blocking all ads while making a living from showing ads to other people it seems less than perfectly honest, (I can&#8217;t really find the right word to go there &#8211; but I think you get the point).</p>
<p>This is something that I&#8217;d like to hear more on &#8211; perhaps you could even write an article on it.  If you feel this comment is too off-topic, go ahead and delete it &#8211; I won&#8217;t be offended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof Harries</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/flock-ships-the-social-browser/#comment-65499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geof Harries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/05/flock-ships-the-social-browser/#comment-65499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though I run a big monitor (24&quot; iMac with 1920 x 1200 resolution) the Flock chrome is annoyingly large. While I understand the value of the tools and icons within that area, the massive girth is enough to turn me off using this browser. The problem stems from the fact that I don&#039;t use a social bookmarking service, so my too-wide bookmark toolbar is not left with enough horizontal space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I run a big monitor (24&#8243; iMac with 1920 x 1200 resolution) the Flock chrome is annoyingly large. While I understand the value of the tools and icons within that area, the massive girth is enough to turn me off using this browser. The problem stems from the fact that I don&#8217;t use a social bookmarking service, so my too-wide bookmark toolbar is not left with enough horizontal space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

