<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Improves Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/firefox-3-improves-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/firefox-3-improves-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gunderloy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/firefox-3-improves-again/#comment-69552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Gunderloy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=1893#comment-69552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m finding performance to be better, and memory use lower, than it was in Firefox 2. There are so many variables, though, that you&#039;ll have to see how it stacks up with your own usage patterns.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m finding performance to be better, and memory use lower, than it was in Firefox 2. There are so many variables, though, that you&#8217;ll have to see how it stacks up with your own usage patterns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/firefox-3-improves-again/#comment-69551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timmy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=1893#comment-69551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if firebug will run better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if firebug will run better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Haven</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/firefox-3-improves-again/#comment-69550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Haven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=1893#comment-69550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does its performance and memory use compare to Firefox 2 ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does its performance and memory use compare to Firefox 2 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawn</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/firefox-3-improves-again/#comment-69549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=1893#comment-69549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new beta does look awfully nice but it about breaks my heart to lose greader. Can&#039;t wait &#039;til it catches up!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new beta does look awfully nice but it about breaks my heart to lose greader. Can&#8217;t wait &#8217;til it catches up!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

