<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Desktop for Adobe AIR: Web Worker-Friendly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/facebook-desktop-for-adobe-air-web-worker-friendly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/facebook-desktop-for-adobe-air-web-worker-friendly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:59:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ar vertas Facebook vietos ekrane?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/facebook-desktop-for-adobe-air-web-worker-friendly/#comment-82101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ar vertas Facebook vietos ekrane?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=11847#comment-82101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] grupių naujienas. Sraute gi dažniausiai kartojasi ir taip Twitter skaitomos žinutės. (WebWorkerDaily)  Įrašo tema: naujienos ir žymos: facebook, programa, tinklas. Pasižymėkite nuorodą. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] grupių naujienas. Sraute gi dažniausiai kartojasi ir taip Twitter skaitomos žinutės. (WebWorkerDaily)  Įrašo tema: naujienos ir žymos: facebook, programa, tinklas. Pasižymėkite nuorodą. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles McPhate</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/facebook-desktop-for-adobe-air-web-worker-friendly/#comment-82100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles McPhate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=11847#comment-82100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t allow you to hide all those stupid survey responses. My current stream has 60 hidden posts -- mostly survey responses. I&#039;ll stick with the web interface for now, which I access via Mozilla Prism, which is a similar concept to Air.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t allow you to hide all those stupid survey responses. My current stream has 60 hidden posts &#8212; mostly survey responses. I&#8217;ll stick with the web interface for now, which I access via Mozilla Prism, which is a similar concept to Air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mackie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/facebook-desktop-for-adobe-air-web-worker-friendly/#comment-82099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Mackie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=11847#comment-82099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@azadcreative - AIR apps aren&#039;t icky, per se. But I think most implementations of AIR apps (Skimmer, for example) are poorly written memory hogs. I haven&#039;t tried Facebook Desktop (frankly, I don&#039;t need another desktop widget - like Darrell, FB very much takes a backseat to Twitter these days) but reviews I&#039;ve seen state that it consumes loads of memory. A well written  desktop client should not need 100-200Mb for an app like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@azadcreative &#8211; AIR apps aren&#8217;t icky, per se. But I think most implementations of AIR apps (Skimmer, for example) are poorly written memory hogs. I haven&#8217;t tried Facebook Desktop (frankly, I don&#8217;t need another desktop widget &#8211; like Darrell, FB very much takes a backseat to Twitter these days) but reviews I&#8217;ve seen state that it consumes loads of memory. A well written  desktop client should not need 100-200Mb for an app like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahab khan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/facebook-desktop-for-adobe-air-web-worker-friendly/#comment-82098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shahab khan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=11847#comment-82098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another Nice app by Adobe after their great app Polaris!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Nice app by Adobe after their great app Polaris!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/facebook-desktop-for-adobe-air-web-worker-friendly/#comment-82097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=11847#comment-82097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds a bit like Skimmer, but not as good]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds a bit like Skimmer, but not as good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azadcreative</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/facebook-desktop-for-adobe-air-web-worker-friendly/#comment-82096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[azadcreative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=11847#comment-82096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AIR apps are actually awesome. I am using Tweetdeck and many other AIR apps. You totally forget they&#039;re not desktop apps. I don&#039;t think the makes it &quot;icky&quot; in any way. Java makes things icky.

And yes, I think a desktop app is great idea. I would use it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIR apps are actually awesome. I am using Tweetdeck and many other AIR apps. You totally forget they&#8217;re not desktop apps. I don&#8217;t think the makes it &#8220;icky&#8221; in any way. Java makes things icky.</p>
<p>And yes, I think a desktop app is great idea. I would use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

