<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Need a Site-Specific Browser?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vipen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vipen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/13/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...i want toa sk you guys a question what need to do if one is not able to open any specific site ..however he is able to open common site&#039;s ..!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;i want toa sk you guys a question what need to do if one is not able to open any specific site ..however he is able to open common site&#8217;s ..!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jegHegy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jegHegy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/13/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to make Opera behave like a Site-Specific Browser

http://my.opera.com/jegHegy/blog/opera-as-site-specific-browser

:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to make Opera behave like a Site-Specific Browser</p>
<p><a href="http://my.opera.com/jegHegy/blog/opera-as-site-specific-browser" rel="nofollow">http://my.opera.com/jegHegy/blog/opera-as-site-specific-browser</a></p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/13/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have recently developed the habit of keeping Firefox and Opera both open. Of course this won&#039;t work well for slower hardware setups.

Besides keeping work and play sites seperated, it offers me the ability to test websites quickly in multiple browsers, and be logged into two google accounts at once.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently developed the habit of keeping Firefox and Opera both open. Of course this won&#8217;t work well for slower hardware setups.</p>
<p>Besides keeping work and play sites seperated, it offers me the ability to test websites quickly in multiple browsers, and be logged into two google accounts at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary-Ann Horley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary-Ann Horley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/13/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Prism a lot, but ultimately I&#039;ve stopped using it because 1) I can only have one instance open at once and 2) no Google Gears]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Prism a lot, but ultimately I&#8217;ve stopped using it because 1) I can only have one instance open at once and 2) no Google Gears</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gunderloy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Gunderloy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/13/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John - Good point on the name. Perhaps &quot;site-specific renderer&quot; would be better, but I fear we&#039;re stuck with the precedent now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; Good point on the name. Perhaps &#8220;site-specific renderer&#8221; would be better, but I fear we&#8217;re stuck with the precedent now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dowdell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Dowdell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/13/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mike, the term &quot;site-specific browser&quot; seems to be an oxymoron, doesn&#039;t it? It either browses, or it doesn&#039;t.

The WWW browser arrived only a decade or so ago, and its abilities complemented those of existing network-aware applications (FTP programs, email clients, iTunes store etc). WWW browsers are great for letting us visit the pages of strangers with impunity. The same level of trust would not be afforded those who wish to reside on our desktops.

The Internet is larger than The Web. Not all computer interaction needs to fit into the document-browser worldview.

jd/adobe]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike, the term &#8220;site-specific browser&#8221; seems to be an oxymoron, doesn&#8217;t it? It either browses, or it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The WWW browser arrived only a decade or so ago, and its abilities complemented those of existing network-aware applications (FTP programs, email clients, iTunes store etc). WWW browsers are great for letting us visit the pages of strangers with impunity. The same level of trust would not be afforded those who wish to reside on our desktops.</p>
<p>The Internet is larger than The Web. Not all computer interaction needs to fit into the document-browser worldview.</p>
<p>jd/adobe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/13/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another option, available through most Linux systems, is multiple windows.

I can have a Window for the book I&#039;m working on - browser and wordprocessor. With the browser tabs only on subject at hand.

Another window has RSS reader, mail.

Another window could have links for developing and maintaining blogs, etc

Sometimes a 4th window for a radio station and the inevitable links to purchase...

I did add Zotero from your recent recommendation. Now I&#039;m going through delicious to get readier access.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another option, available through most Linux systems, is multiple windows.</p>
<p>I can have a Window for the book I&#8217;m working on &#8211; browser and wordprocessor. With the browser tabs only on subject at hand.</p>
<p>Another window has RSS reader, mail.</p>
<p>Another window could have links for developing and maintaining blogs, etc</p>
<p>Sometimes a 4th window for a radio station and the inevitable links to purchase&#8230;</p>
<p>I did add Zotero from your recent recommendation. Now I&#8217;m going through delicious to get readier access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/13/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.  I use Firefox and I have an extension loaded which allows me to &#039;lock&#039; tabs - so I keep Gmail, Google Reader and a few others open in tabs and &#039;locked&#039; so I don&#039;t mistakenly close them.  My browser is always open so I can surf and hit these at at time.

What I really need is another &#039;non-developer&#039; profile setup so I can have a personal browser open and then my &#039;work&#039; version loaded with Firebug, developer toolbar, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I use Firefox and I have an extension loaded which allows me to &#8216;lock&#8217; tabs &#8211; so I keep Gmail, Google Reader and a few others open in tabs and &#8216;locked&#8217; so I don&#8217;t mistakenly close them.  My browser is always open so I can surf and hit these at at time.</p>
<p>What I really need is another &#8216;non-developer&#8217; profile setup so I can have a personal browser open and then my &#8216;work&#8217; version loaded with Firebug, developer toolbar, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sridhar Vembu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sridhar Vembu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/13/do-you-need-a-site-specific-browser/#comment-66727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have used Mozilla Prism and found it quite useful. You are absolutely right - there are occasions (for a long running application session) when a site-specific browser is quite useful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Mozilla Prism and found it quite useful. You are absolutely right &#8211; there are occasions (for a long running application session) when a site-specific browser is quite useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

