Comments on: A Note from the Editor http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-note-from-the-editor/ Fri, 25 May 2012 19:21:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: John Welsh http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-note-from-the-editor/#comment-78677 Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:15:31 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/01/08/a-note-from-the-editor/#comment-78677 Yes, I agree wtih @MikeGale. From a Web 2.0 point of view, it should not matter where the posting is, as long as we get to read what I need.

But, from my old, legacy days, I sympathise with WWD. I was the editor of a weekly paper and I would receive “letters to the editor” from people who had sent the same letter to our competitor, another weekly (without telling us,of course).

And, yet, the letter writers were exactly the same readers who complained that they could not tell the difference between the two weeklies. Grrrrrr!.

Cheers

]]> By: Mike Gale http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-note-from-the-editor/#comment-78676 Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:35:02 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/01/08/a-note-from-the-editor/#comment-78676 From a reader point of view, the concerns expressed here don’t seem particularly relevant. My major concerns are:

1) Is it worth reading?

2) Would I have seen it if it wasn’t here?

]]> By: Jacob Share from JobMob http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-note-from-the-editor/#comment-78675 Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:42:32 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/01/08/a-note-from-the-editor/#comment-78675 Judi, I’m glad you published the link so others won’t be fooled. I appreciate your integrity.

]]> By: Judi Sohn http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-note-from-the-editor/#comment-78674 Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:51:57 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/01/08/a-note-from-the-editor/#comment-78674 Mark, that’s true.

Frankly, I put in the link because we inadvertently did a disservice to Freelance Switch by publishing the article. The link was for them, not the contributor.

]]> By: Mark O'Neill http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-note-from-the-editor/#comment-78673 Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:30:09 +0000 http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/01/08/a-note-from-the-editor/#comment-78673 Why are you linking to the other article? All you’re doing is giving the guy more publicity and SEO incentives – which he doesn’t deserve!

]]>