<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Fresh Look at Flock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-fresh-look-at-flock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-fresh-look-at-flock/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 08:48:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renata</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-fresh-look-at-flock/#comment-61178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Renata]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/05/a-fresh-look-at-flock/#comment-61178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use Flock for a long time. I know it&#039;s heavy and sometimes buggy, but this new version is making my eyes sparkle!
The good think about Flock is the easy fun! Just Drag and Drop Fun!
And I really really love the smalls thinks like snippet bar and multiple fav bars.
I will give a try in the new one!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Flock for a long time. I know it&#8217;s heavy and sometimes buggy, but this new version is making my eyes sparkle!<br />
The good think about Flock is the easy fun! Just Drag and Drop Fun!<br />
And I really really love the smalls thinks like snippet bar and multiple fav bars.<br />
I will give a try in the new one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GkH</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-fresh-look-at-flock/#comment-61177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GkH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/05/a-fresh-look-at-flock/#comment-61177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried it a while back, maybe a year or so ago, and was disappointed to see that it had re-edited the creation dates on all my del.icio.us bookmarks.

When any software edits my data, I want to know about it. After seeing the effect it had on my archive of bookmarks, I decided it was not worth any more similar surprises.

Flock is an interesting concept but it&#039;s delivery and, frankly, the company&#039;s voice and presence online are extremely hyperbolic -- a lot of what&#039;s wrong with the whole Web 2.0 vibe, to be truthful.

To each his own.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried it a while back, maybe a year or so ago, and was disappointed to see that it had re-edited the creation dates on all my del.icio.us bookmarks.</p>
<p>When any software edits my data, I want to know about it. After seeing the effect it had on my archive of bookmarks, I decided it was not worth any more similar surprises.</p>
<p>Flock is an interesting concept but it&#8217;s delivery and, frankly, the company&#8217;s voice and presence online are extremely hyperbolic &#8212; a lot of what&#8217;s wrong with the whole Web 2.0 vibe, to be truthful.</p>
<p>To each his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kOoLiNuS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-fresh-look-at-flock/#comment-61176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kOoLiNuS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/05/a-fresh-look-at-flock/#comment-61176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i DO actually like it, but ... have you tried running it for the canonicals 8 hours of work with many tabs opened ?

after a while it eats out an awful LOT of RAM, at least on my 2GB macbook and 1,5GB linux (centos) machine

so, sometimes it&#039;s still a memory hog for slower machines or with &quot;few&quot; RAM ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i DO actually like it, but &#8230; have you tried running it for the canonicals 8 hours of work with many tabs opened ?</p>
<p>after a while it eats out an awful LOT of RAM, at least on my 2GB macbook and 1,5GB linux (centos) machine</p>
<p>so, sometimes it&#8217;s still a memory hog for slower machines or with &#8220;few&#8221; RAM &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarabocaneanu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-fresh-look-at-flock/#comment-61175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sarabocaneanu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/05/a-fresh-look-at-flock/#comment-61175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried using Flock for 3-4 months some time ago. Gave up... returned to the real Firefox for any number of reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried using Flock for 3-4 months some time ago. Gave up&#8230; returned to the real Firefox for any number of reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac2</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/a-fresh-look-at-flock/#comment-61174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mac2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/05/a-fresh-look-at-flock/#comment-61174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I installed Flock 0.8.99.1 for Mac yesterday. I instantly fell in love.

Although I was a big user of Firefox on Windows, since I switch to the Mac I dropped it, manly because I found it slow (to say the least). In Mac I started using Safari that delivers well but is, well, boring. Camino could be a nice browser but I consider it boring too and with a big lack of add-ons. I tried Opera and liked some things including the note taking, the mail integration and the widgets... but, still, I couldn&#039;t make the jump. I also tested the new alpha of OmniWeb which is quite appealing and super fast; in fact I was ready to dump 15 US$ when I decided to give Flock another chance (I had tried 0.7 and didn&#039;t find it that great).

Oh, my... The capacities and, specially, the potential! I&#039;m a blogger and I use del.icio.us and ma.gnolia as my support on the blog. P.E.R.F.E.C.T. I&#039;m looking forward to future developments: it&#039;s on the right track!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed Flock 0.8.99.1 for Mac yesterday. I instantly fell in love.</p>
<p>Although I was a big user of Firefox on Windows, since I switch to the Mac I dropped it, manly because I found it slow (to say the least). In Mac I started using Safari that delivers well but is, well, boring. Camino could be a nice browser but I consider it boring too and with a big lack of add-ons. I tried Opera and liked some things including the note taking, the mail integration and the widgets&#8230; but, still, I couldn&#8217;t make the jump. I also tested the new alpha of OmniWeb which is quite appealing and super fast; in fact I was ready to dump 15 US$ when I decided to give Flock another chance (I had tried 0.7 and didn&#8217;t find it that great).</p>
<p>Oh, my&#8230; The capacities and, specially, the potential! I&#8217;m a blogger and I use del.icio.us and ma.gnolia as my support on the blog. P.E.R.F.E.C.T. I&#8217;m looking forward to future developments: it&#8217;s on the right track!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

