<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zenn Says Lithium Off the Table, Still Bets on EEStor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/zenn-says-lithium-off-the-table-still-bets-on-eestor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/zenn-says-lithium-off-the-table-still-bets-on-eestor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Branca</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/zenn-says-lithium-off-the-table-still-bets-on-eestor/#comment-25884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Branca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39168#comment-25884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m Really disappointed in some of those statement , be they the standard speel or a hint into not getting the power usage that was claimed to achievable with the new eestor devise. Its also strange that pretty much every article I read on this supposed devise has a date between 2006-2008. All of the claims seem to be the same within all the article. How has so much time passed and there is no working devise to show off this break through technology?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m Really disappointed in some of those statement , be they the standard speel or a hint into not getting the power usage that was claimed to achievable with the new eestor devise. Its also strange that pretty much every article I read on this supposed devise has a date between 2006-2008. All of the claims seem to be the same within all the article. How has so much time passed and there is no working devise to show off this break through technology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drumbeat: August 15, 2009 &#171; Energy Portfolio Managers Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/zenn-says-lithium-off-the-table-still-bets-on-eestor/#comment-25883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drumbeat: August 15, 2009 &#171; Energy Portfolio Managers Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39168#comment-25883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Zenn Says Lithium Off the Table, Still Bets on EEStor If Canadian electric vehicle maker Zenn Motor Co. once saw lithium-ion batteries as a possible alternative to devices from its controversial investment in ultracapacitor developer EEStor, the more standard technology is now officially out of the running for its future cars. According to Zenn’s third-quarter results release, out today, the company’s engineering group “re-evaluated a number of lithium-based power-packs for inclusion in its solutions” between April and the end of June. But those efforts, in the context of what Zenn calls “the progressed state of development” of EEStor’s technology, have brought the company to teh following conclusion: Lithium does not offer “an economically viable power source for its offerings.” [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zenn Says Lithium Off the Table, Still Bets on EEStor If Canadian electric vehicle maker Zenn Motor Co. once saw lithium-ion batteries as a possible alternative to devices from its controversial investment in ultracapacitor developer EEStor, the more standard technology is now officially out of the running for its future cars. According to Zenn’s third-quarter results release, out today, the company’s engineering group “re-evaluated a number of lithium-based power-packs for inclusion in its solutions” between April and the end of June. But those efforts, in the context of what Zenn calls “the progressed state of development” of EEStor’s technology, have brought the company to teh following conclusion: Lithium does not offer “an economically viable power source for its offerings.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drumbeat: August 15, 2009 &#124; Bear Market Investments</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/zenn-says-lithium-off-the-table-still-bets-on-eestor/#comment-25882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drumbeat: August 15, 2009 &#124; Bear Market Investments]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39168#comment-25882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Zenn Says Lithium Off the Table, Still Bets on EEStor If Canadian electric vehicle maker Zenn Motor Co. once saw lithium-ion batteries as a possible alternative to devices from its controversial investment in ultracapacitor developer EEStor, the more standard technology is now officially out of the running for its future cars. According to Zenn’s third-quarter results release, out today, the company’s engineering group “re-evaluated a number of lithium-based power-packs for inclusion in its solutions” between April and the end of June. But those efforts, in the context of what Zenn calls “the progressed state of development” of EEStor’s technology, have brought the company to teh following conclusion: Lithium does not offer “an economically viable power source for its offerings.” [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zenn Says Lithium Off the Table, Still Bets on EEStor If Canadian electric vehicle maker Zenn Motor Co. once saw lithium-ion batteries as a possible alternative to devices from its controversial investment in ultracapacitor developer EEStor, the more standard technology is now officially out of the running for its future cars. According to Zenn’s third-quarter results release, out today, the company’s engineering group “re-evaluated a number of lithium-based power-packs for inclusion in its solutions” between April and the end of June. But those efforts, in the context of what Zenn calls “the progressed state of development” of EEStor’s technology, have brought the company to teh following conclusion: Lithium does not offer “an economically viable power source for its offerings.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Miller</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/zenn-says-lithium-off-the-table-still-bets-on-eestor/#comment-25881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39168#comment-25881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I am an attorney.  The language &quot;...may not be successfully commercialized at all, in a manner providing the features and benefits claimed…or on a timely basis&quot;  is a standard legal securities disclaimer.  You will find that attached to virtually every statement issued by a public company.  The statement by itself means nothing.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an attorney.  The language &#8220;&#8230;may not be successfully commercialized at all, in a manner providing the features and benefits claimed…or on a timely basis&#8221;  is a standard legal securities disclaimer.  You will find that attached to virtually every statement issued by a public company.  The statement by itself means nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/zenn-says-lithium-off-the-table-still-bets-on-eestor/#comment-25880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39168#comment-25880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Bla Bla Bla.... stock sprooking!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bla Bla Bla&#8230;. stock sprooking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drumbeat: August 15, 2009 &#124; Climate Vine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/zenn-says-lithium-off-the-table-still-bets-on-eestor/#comment-25879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drumbeat: August 15, 2009 &#124; Climate Vine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39168#comment-25879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Zenn Says Lithium Off the Table, Still Bets on EEStor If Canadian electric vehicle maker Zenn Motor Co. once saw lithium-ion batteries as a possible alternative to devices from its controversial investment in ultracapacitor developer EEStor, the more standard technology is now officially out of the running for its future cars. According to Zenn’s third-quarter results release, out today, the company’s engineering group “re-evaluated a number of lithium-based power-packs for inclusion in its solutions” between April and the end of June. But those efforts, in the context of what Zenn calls “the progressed state of development” of EEStor’s technology, have brought the company to teh following conclusion: Lithium does not offer “an economically viable power source for its offerings.” [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zenn Says Lithium Off the Table, Still Bets on EEStor If Canadian electric vehicle maker Zenn Motor Co. once saw lithium-ion batteries as a possible alternative to devices from its controversial investment in ultracapacitor developer EEStor, the more standard technology is now officially out of the running for its future cars. According to Zenn’s third-quarter results release, out today, the company’s engineering group “re-evaluated a number of lithium-based power-packs for inclusion in its solutions” between April and the end of June. But those efforts, in the context of what Zenn calls “the progressed state of development” of EEStor’s technology, have brought the company to teh following conclusion: Lithium does not offer “an economically viable power source for its offerings.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodities Broker &#124; Drumbeat: August 15, 2009 &#124; Commodities Options &#124; Commodities Futures &#124; Commodities Prices</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/zenn-says-lithium-off-the-table-still-bets-on-eestor/#comment-25878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Commodities Broker &#124; Drumbeat: August 15, 2009 &#124; Commodities Options &#124; Commodities Futures &#124; Commodities Prices]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39168#comment-25878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Zenn Says Lithium Off the Table, Still Bets on EEStor If Canadian electric vehicle maker Zenn Motor Co. once saw lithium-ion batteries as a possible alternative to devices from its controversial investment in ultracapacitor developer EEStor, the more standard technology is now officially out of the running for its future cars. According to Zenn’s third-quarter results release, out today, the company’s engineering group “re-evaluated a number of lithium-based power-packs for inclusion in its solutions” between April and the end of June. But those efforts, in the context of what Zenn calls “the progressed state of development” of EEStor’s technology, have brought the company to teh following conclusion: Lithium does not offer “an economically viable power source for its offerings.” [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zenn Says Lithium Off the Table, Still Bets on EEStor If Canadian electric vehicle maker Zenn Motor Co. once saw lithium-ion batteries as a possible alternative to devices from its controversial investment in ultracapacitor developer EEStor, the more standard technology is now officially out of the running for its future cars. According to Zenn’s third-quarter results release, out today, the company’s engineering group “re-evaluated a number of lithium-based power-packs for inclusion in its solutions” between April and the end of June. But those efforts, in the context of what Zenn calls “the progressed state of development” of EEStor’s technology, have brought the company to teh following conclusion: Lithium does not offer “an economically viable power source for its offerings.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

