<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Kindle Is Good for the Planet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:33:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;what this article does not take in to account is the trees what this article does not take in to account is the trees planted, in American for every tree that is cut down 3 trees are planted. It also does not take in to account the production of the kindle nor any of the minerals that we stripped and mined from our earth.  Lastly does it account for the E waste?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;this is article is juvenile&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what this article does not take in to account is the trees what this article does not take in to account is the trees planted, in American for every tree that is cut down 3 trees are planted. It also does not take in to account the production of the kindle nor any of the minerals that we stripped and mined from our earth.  Lastly does it account for the E waste?</p>
<p>this is article is juvenile</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3 Reasons iPad Fans Can Ignore Greenpeace</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3 Reasons iPad Fans Can Ignore Greenpeace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] According to the Cleantech Group, each one of Amazon&#8217;s e-readers, on average, delivers an estimated savings of 168 kg of CO2 per year. Strong iPad sales will help grow the e-book market (via its iBookstore), accelerate the [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to the Cleantech Group, each one of Amazon&#8217;s e-readers, on average, delivers an estimated savings of 168 kg of CO2 per year. Strong iPad sales will help grow the e-book market (via its iBookstore), accelerate the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Green is the Kindle? &#171; Vavcare Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Green is the Kindle? &#171; Vavcare Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] green, according to a new report by the Cleantech Group.&#160; For every Kindle currently in use, there are about 22.5 less books that are sold each [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] green, according to a new report by the Cleantech Group.&nbsp; For every Kindle currently in use, there are about 22.5 less books that are sold each [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Green Tech Gift Ideas for Black Friday - Look For The Drop : Think Clean . Live Green . Drink Pure</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10 Green Tech Gift Ideas for Black Friday - Look For The Drop : Think Clean . Live Green . Drink Pure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] books per year, and thus deliver an estimated savings of 168 kg of CO2 per year, a study that came out this year from the Cleantech Group found. In contrast the U.S. book and magazine sectors accounted for the harvesting of 125 million [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] books per year, and thus deliver an estimated savings of 168 kg of CO2 per year, a study that came out this year from the Cleantech Group found. In contrast the U.S. book and magazine sectors accounted for the harvesting of 125 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Green Tech Gift Ideas for Black Friday</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10 Green Tech Gift Ideas for Black Friday]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] books per year, and thus deliver an estimated savings of 168 kg of CO2 per year, a study that came out this year from the Cleantech Group found. In contrast the U.S. book and magazine sectors accounted for the harvesting of 125 million [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] books per year, and thus deliver an estimated savings of 168 kg of CO2 per year, a study that came out this year from the Cleantech Group found. In contrast the U.S. book and magazine sectors accounted for the harvesting of 125 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Sprout</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daily Sprout]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Tablet &amp; Dematerialization: If the Kindle succeeded in reducing such carbon emissions, by displacing books, we&#8217;re wondering how many books and magazine&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s much [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tablet &amp; Dematerialization: If the Kindle succeeded in reducing such carbon emissions, by displacing books, we&#8217;re wondering how many books and magazine&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pesquisa diz que Kindle é &#8220;verde&#8221; &#171; O Livreiro</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pesquisa diz que Kindle é &#8220;verde&#8221; &#171; O Livreiro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] 9,9 bilhões/Kg de CO2, que seriam emitidos se o gadget não tivesse sido inventado, como mostra o site Earth 2 [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9,9 bilhões/Kg de CO2, que seriam emitidos se o gadget não tivesse sido inventado, como mostra o site Earth 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kindle &#171; Jason Pickavance</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kindle &#171; Jason Pickavance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Why the Kindle Is Good for the Planet [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why the Kindle Is Good for the Planet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Bosley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Bosley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Where did you actually get a copy of this report? I can only find the PR about the report. I suspect that there are very dubious assumptions that reading the real report carefully will quickly disclose.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For instance, did the report assume that the book was purchased read once and discarded?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you actually get a copy of this report? I can only find the PR about the report. I suspect that there are very dubious assumptions that reading the real report carefully will quickly disclose.</p>
<p>For instance, did the report assume that the book was purchased read once and discarded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Readers More Eco-Friendly than Paper Books</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E-Readers More Eco-Friendly than Paper Books]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] of the world’s most polluting industries: the publishing of books, newspapers and magazines,” said the report’s author, Emma [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the world’s most polluting industries: the publishing of books, newspapers and magazines,” said the report’s author, Emma [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.H.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C.H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks Katie for the additional information. It&#039;s still somewhat of a toss-up, but they provided some good data on the topic. I really appreciate the feedback.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Katie for the additional information. It&#8217;s still somewhat of a toss-up, but they provided some good data on the topic. I really appreciate the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eco-Beat, 8/21 &#124; Go Green</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eco-Beat, 8/21 &#124; Go Green]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Is Kindle really greener than books? [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Kindle really greener than books? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eco-Beat, 8/21 &#124; InfoFork.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eco-Beat, 8/21 &#124; InfoFork.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Is Kindle really greener than books? [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Kindle really greener than books? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raz Godelnik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raz Godelnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Katie,thanks for the important update!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From what I understand from the report the 168 kg of CO2 figure is calculated based on the paper-books emissions that are saved while using the Kindle (in average). I am not sure if this is a net figure that also takes into consideration the manufacturing and disposal impacts (in terms of emissions) of the kindle. I&#039;ll be happy if you can clarify it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Best,
Raz Godelnik
Eco-Libris&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie,thanks for the important update!</p>
<p>From what I understand from the report the 168 kg of CO2 figure is calculated based on the paper-books emissions that are saved while using the Kindle (in average). I am not sure if this is a net figure that also takes into consideration the manufacturing and disposal impacts (in terms of emissions) of the kindle. I&#8217;ll be happy if you can clarify it.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Raz Godelnik<br />
Eco-Libris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Kindle &#171; Jason Pickavance</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Kindle &#171; Jason Pickavance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Why the Kindle Is Good for the Planet [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why the Kindle Is Good for the Planet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Toeman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/why-the-kindle-is-good-for-the-planet/#comment-26062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Toeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=39467#comment-26062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The argument is missing one key attribute of books - they can be re-used.  If people were to purchase more used books, or go to the library, then the offset there is even greater.  Overall book production would drop, and no need to build electronics.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, the production of a book uses entirely renewable resources (ink, paper).  The production of an e-reader uses mostly un-renewable (ergo un-sustainable) resources (plastic, silicon, etc).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the point CH raised regarding people replacing outdated devices is also key.  Especially the demographic of those buying Kindles...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument is missing one key attribute of books &#8211; they can be re-used.  If people were to purchase more used books, or go to the library, then the offset there is even greater.  Overall book production would drop, and no need to build electronics.</p>
<p>Also, the production of a book uses entirely renewable resources (ink, paper).  The production of an e-reader uses mostly un-renewable (ergo un-sustainable) resources (plastic, silicon, etc).</p>
<p>I think the point CH raised regarding people replacing outdated devices is also key.  Especially the demographic of those buying Kindles&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

