<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.N. Carbon Credits Called Bogus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 15:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#124; Eco Friendly Mag</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#124; Eco Friendly Mag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#124; Alternative Energy News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#124; Alternative Energy News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 03:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbon Market Software Startup Ramps Up Funding &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carbon Market Software Startup Ramps Up Funding &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] question whether carbon offsets projects are actually facilitating new carbon abatement, and the World Wildlife Fund released a report last year calling 20 percent of the UN’s certified emissions reduction credits, as [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] question whether carbon offsets projects are actually facilitating new carbon abatement, and the World Wildlife Fund released a report last year calling 20 percent of the UN’s certified emissions reduction credits, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UN Offsets Might Not Be Offsetting Much &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UN Offsets Might Not Be Offsetting Much &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] is the same issue the World Wildlife Foundation raised months when they released a report calling alleging 20 percent of the CDM offsets are [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the same issue the World Wildlife Foundation raised months when they released a report calling alleging 20 percent of the CDM offsets are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james bogin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james bogin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Duh, what can you expect from the likes of Al Gore&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh, what can you expect from the likes of Al Gore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dixon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Dixon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Looks like Al Gore has created a new way to make money for some, at the expense of most of us.  What in hell is this about?  You can pollute all you want, and pay for it?  Well that makes sense to the rich, and the corporations I suppose.  I see it working into a new tax, just for being alive on the planet.  Who will the beneficiaries be?  Certainly not the general population.  Be afraid, very afraid.  This is just a scam, and will eventually be a religion if Al Gore has his way.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Al Gore has created a new way to make money for some, at the expense of most of us.  What in hell is this about?  You can pollute all you want, and pay for it?  Well that makes sense to the rich, and the corporations I suppose.  I see it working into a new tax, just for being alive on the planet.  Who will the beneficiaries be?  Certainly not the general population.  Be afraid, very afraid.  This is just a scam, and will eventually be a religion if Al Gore has his way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The House Duped by Carbon Offsets? &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The House Duped by Carbon Offsets? &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] carbon market as well. Around the same time Congress was purchasing these offsets, the World Wildlife Fund released a report denouncing 20 percent of the UN&#8217;s certified emissions reduction credits, as facilitated [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] carbon market as well. Around the same time Congress was purchasing these offsets, the World Wildlife Fund released a report denouncing 20 percent of the UN&#8217;s certified emissions reduction credits, as facilitated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F.T.C. Investigates Greenwashing &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[F.T.C. Investigates Greenwashing &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] problem led the World Wildlife Fund to accuse a full fifth of all U.N. carbon credits to be bogus. Hopefully the F.T.C. will offer verification solutions and provide a body of standards that could [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] problem led the World Wildlife Fund to accuse a full fifth of all U.N. carbon credits to be bogus. Hopefully the F.T.C. will offer verification solutions and provide a body of standards that could [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

