<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Sprout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/the-daily-sprout-146/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/the-daily-sprout-146/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Rubens</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/the-daily-sprout-146/#comment-12037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Rubens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2069#comment-12037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;@ Alexis:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for linking your article because I think you&#039;re absolutely right, this does not need to interpreted at &quot;carbon fatalism.&quot; I was just summarizing the argument made by New Scientist.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Still, it is daunting, to say the least, to see an increasingly accurate carbon footprint calculated for citizens of the developed world. Let us hope that calculation and identification are steps that lead to reduction.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Alexis:</p>
<p>Thanks for linking your article because I think you&#8217;re absolutely right, this does not need to interpreted at &#8220;carbon fatalism.&#8221; I was just summarizing the argument made by New Scientist.</p>
<p>Still, it is daunting, to say the least, to see an increasingly accurate carbon footprint calculated for citizens of the developed world. Let us hope that calculation and identification are steps that lead to reduction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis Madrigal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/the-daily-sprout-146/#comment-12036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexis Madrigal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2069#comment-12036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;On the 4th item, re: fatalism on carbon footprints... I think the spin that came off that survey was all wrong. Really, what they did was calculate how much the current American system contributes to energy usage. That&#039;s a useful thing to know, and highlights the need for systemic change, which I read as a good thing. I responded to it here:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MIT Class Calculates Carbon Footprint of &quot;The Man&quot;
http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/04/mit-class-calcu.html&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the 4th item, re: fatalism on carbon footprints&#8230; I think the spin that came off that survey was all wrong. Really, what they did was calculate how much the current American system contributes to energy usage. That&#8217;s a useful thing to know, and highlights the need for systemic change, which I read as a good thing. I responded to it here:</p>
<p>MIT Class Calculates Carbon Footprint of &#8220;The Man&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/04/mit-class-calcu.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/04/mit-class-calcu.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

