<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NoFutureGen: DOE Nixes Support for Clean Coal Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:36:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utility Wanted: Loss of Coal Giants Ups Pressure On FutureGen, DOE</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Utility Wanted: Loss of Coal Giants Ups Pressure On FutureGen, DOE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Chu announced plans to contribute more than $1 billion to the project, which had stalled since the Bush administration pulled funding last year, two coal-burning utility partners have backed out of the deal &#8212; signaling a [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chu announced plans to contribute more than $1 billion to the project, which had stalled since the Bush administration pulled funding last year, two coal-burning utility partners have backed out of the deal &#8212; signaling a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Controversial FutureGen Carbon Capture Demo Gets a &#8220;Rapid Restart&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Controversial FutureGen Carbon Capture Demo Gets a &#8220;Rapid Restart&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] carbon capture technology ran hugely over budget in the early stages, and hit a dead end when the Bush administration pulled funding. Then back in March Energy Secretary Steven Chu came to the rescue and said he wanted to take a [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] carbon capture technology ran hugely over budget in the early stages, and hit a dead end when the Bush administration pulled funding. Then back in March Energy Secretary Steven Chu came to the rescue and said he wanted to take a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Discuss your health check situation, counting heart problems, and medications, including alpha blockers prescribed for prostate troubles or high blood pressure, with your doctor to make sure Vardenafil hcl 20mg is right for you and so as to you are healthy enough for sexual action. Vardenafil hcl 20mg is not suggested for men with uncontrolled high blood pressure.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discuss your health check situation, counting heart problems, and medications, including alpha blockers prescribed for prostate troubles or high blood pressure, with your doctor to make sure Vardenafil hcl 20mg is right for you and so as to you are healthy enough for sexual action. Vardenafil hcl 20mg is not suggested for men with uncontrolled high blood pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeKateWilson_12k</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeKateWilson_12k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Coal plants which use CCS cut carbon emissions by up to 90 per cent, as the carbon dioxide released when the coal is burnt is stored underground, rather than released into the atmosphere.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are two main technologies: &#039;post-combustion&#039;, which removes carbon after coal is burnt, and pre-combustion&#039;. Last week, the government said it would only accept &#039;post-combustion&#039; plans as the technology could be &#039;retro-fitted&#039; to existing dirty coal plants.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Carbon capture and storage (CCS) remains controversial as experts continue to question the length of time carbon can stay buried before escaping back into the atmosphere. The solution has also been criticized as unsustainable due to the limited amount of storage space for carbon available on the planet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Follow the Link:lincenergy.us/&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coal plants which use CCS cut carbon emissions by up to 90 per cent, as the carbon dioxide released when the coal is burnt is stored underground, rather than released into the atmosphere.</p>
<p>There are two main technologies: &#8216;post-combustion&#8217;, which removes carbon after coal is burnt, and pre-combustion&#8217;. Last week, the government said it would only accept &#8216;post-combustion&#8217; plans as the technology could be &#8216;retro-fitted&#8217; to existing dirty coal plants.</p>
<p>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) remains controversial as experts continue to question the length of time carbon can stay buried before escaping back into the atmosphere. The solution has also been criticized as unsustainable due to the limited amount of storage space for carbon available on the planet.</p>
<p>Follow the Link:lincenergy.us/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Fossil Fuels Get More Efficient With Solar Thermal? &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can Fossil Fuels Get More Efficient With Solar Thermal? &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] is prohibitively expensive. Plans in the U.S. for a big carbon capture and storage pilot plant were dropped by the Department of Energy after costs spiraled upward, with the DOE now planning to fund a number [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is prohibitively expensive. Plans in the U.S. for a big carbon capture and storage pilot plant were dropped by the Department of Energy after costs spiraled upward, with the DOE now planning to fund a number [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option &#171; RFF Library Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option &#171; RFF Library Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IEA: Carbon Capture Needs $20B — Now &#124; Eco Friendly Mag</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IEA: Carbon Capture Needs $20B — Now &#124; Eco Friendly Mag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IEA: Carbon Capture Needs $20B — Now</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IEA: Carbon Capture Needs $20B — Now]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IEA: Carbon Capture Needs $20B — Now &#124; Alternative Energy News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IEA: Carbon Capture Needs $20B — Now &#124; Alternative Energy News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IEA: Carbon Capture Needs $20B &#8212; Now &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IEA: Carbon Capture Needs $20B &#8212; Now &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOE Funds Carbon Capture With $340M &#38; Solar $24M, Sigh &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DOE Funds Carbon Capture With $340M &#38; Solar $24M, Sigh &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Since 2001 the DOE has put more than $2.5 billion into clean coal, including millions sunk into the scuttled FutureGen project. This week&#8217;s $340 million is part of President Bush&#8217;s $2 billion, 10-Year Clean Coal [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Since 2001 the DOE has put more than $2.5 billion into clean coal, including millions sunk into the scuttled FutureGen project. This week&#8217;s $340 million is part of President Bush&#8217;s $2 billion, 10-Year Clean Coal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY Pulls Plug on $1.5B Clean Coal Plant &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NY Pulls Plug on $1.5B Clean Coal Plant &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] getting scuttled and few large-scale test projects scheduled, especially in the U.S. since the cancellation of the DOE&#8217;s FutureGen project, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be much progress in demonstrating the technology of carbon capture and [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] getting scuttled and few large-scale test projects scheduled, especially in the U.S. since the cancellation of the DOE&#8217;s FutureGen project, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be much progress in demonstrating the technology of carbon capture and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOE Revamps Carbon Storage with $1.3B &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DOE Revamps Carbon Storage with $1.3B &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...]   No Comments Posted June 25th, 2008 at 1:59 pm in Policy     When the U.S. Department of Energy pulled the plug on the FutureGen project, the clean coal industry was left adrift, aimless in the cleantech sea. The DOE said [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   No Comments Posted June 25th, 2008 at 1:59 pm in Policy     When the U.S. Department of Energy pulled the plug on the FutureGen project, the clean coal industry was left adrift, aimless in the cleantech sea. The DOE said [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOE Still Throwing Money at Carbon Capture &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DOE Still Throwing Money at Carbon Capture &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] a number of smaller, distributed projects to test the capture and storage of carbon following the nixing of the FutureGen project, the Department of Energy has awarded $126.6 million to two regional carbon capture [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a number of smaller, distributed projects to test the capture and storage of carbon following the nixing of the FutureGen project, the Department of Energy has awarded $126.6 million to two regional carbon capture [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Green energy is definitely the best solution in most cases.  Technology like solar energy, wind power, fuel cells, zaps electric vehicles, EV hybrids, etc have come so far recently. Green energy even costs way less than oil and gas in many cases.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green energy is definitely the best solution in most cases.  Technology like solar energy, wind power, fuel cells, zaps electric vehicles, EV hybrids, etc have come so far recently. Green energy even costs way less than oil and gas in many cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everyone Agrees, Carbon Capture &#38; Storage Ain&#8217;t Easy &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/nofuturegen-doe-nixes-support-for-clean-coal-project/#comment-9672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Everyone Agrees, Carbon Capture &#38; Storage Ain&#8217;t Easy &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1275#comment-9672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] by Craig Rubens   No Comments Posted March 7th, 2008 at 6:41 pm in Big Green    With the recent demise of the FutureGen project, and the feds and banks alike distancing themselves from the future risk of carbon intensive coal, [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Craig Rubens   No Comments Posted March 7th, 2008 at 6:41 pm in Big Green    With the recent demise of the FutureGen project, and the feds and banks alike distancing themselves from the future risk of carbon intensive coal, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

