<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green Aviation: It&#039;s All About Biofuels, But Get Ready to Wait</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/green-aviation-its-all-about-biofuels-but-get-ready-to-wait/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/green-aviation-its-all-about-biofuels-but-get-ready-to-wait/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 62 Mile Club &#187; Green Air and Space part of new plan for NASA</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/green-aviation-its-all-about-biofuels-but-get-ready-to-wait/#comment-26520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[62 Mile Club &#187; Green Air and Space part of new plan for NASA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=40702#comment-26520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Green Aviation    &#160; [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Green Aviation    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt-Loving, Water-Sipping Plants: Future of Jet Fuel?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/green-aviation-its-all-about-biofuels-but-get-ready-to-wait/#comment-26519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salt-Loving, Water-Sipping Plants: Future of Jet Fuel?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=40702#comment-26519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] make those emissions increasingly expensive, growing the key ingredients for a lower-emission fuel could be very big business.   [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] make those emissions increasingly expensive, growing the key ingredients for a lower-emission fuel could be very big business.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Ink: Waiting for OPEC, Pining for China, and New Nukes - Environmental Capital - WSJ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/green-aviation-its-all-about-biofuels-but-get-ready-to-wait/#comment-26518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green Ink: Waiting for OPEC, Pining for China, and New Nukes - Environmental Capital - WSJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=40702#comment-26518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...]  [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wallace</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/green-aviation-its-all-about-biofuels-but-get-ready-to-wait/#comment-26517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=40702#comment-26517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Some more current data probably exists, but in 2000 US passengers rode 516 billion miles by plane and 4,390 miles by automobile.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;10% of miles by planes.  And they did that with &lt;4% of the liquid fuel?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And in 2000 planes averaged 38 MPG per passenger mile.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d say that our concentration needs to be on electrifying our personal vehicles and improving our rail service for short/medium length trips and not get overly concerned about planes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When we get carbon neutral biofuels for planes, great, but between now and then just cut the amount of petroleum we burn on the ground.  That&#039;s doable right now.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some more current data probably exists, but in 2000 US passengers rode 516 billion miles by plane and 4,390 miles by automobile.</p>
<p>10% of miles by planes.  And they did that with &lt;4% of the liquid fuel?</p>
<p>And in 2000 planes averaged 38 MPG per passenger mile.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that our concentration needs to be on electrifying our personal vehicles and improving our rail service for short/medium length trips and not get overly concerned about planes.</p>
<p>When we get carbon neutral biofuels for planes, great, but between now and then just cut the amount of petroleum we burn on the ground.  That&#8217;s doable right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

