<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GE&#039;s Redesigns Energy-Efficient Bulbs To Look Like Regular Bulbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/ge-to-sell-energy-efficient-bulbs-in-disguise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/ge-to-sell-energy-efficient-bulbs-in-disguise/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:56:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/ge-to-sell-energy-efficient-bulbs-in-disguise/#comment-18183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=17359#comment-18183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not as nutty as you make it sound. I&#039;ve been buying the twisty kind of CFL for year (maybe 10 years -- have they existed that long), but never made the total switchover because I have a few lamps, including one I inherited from my grandmother, that require an incandescent shaped bulb. So...now I can finally buy CFLs for those lamps as well.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not as nutty as you make it sound. I&#8217;ve been buying the twisty kind of CFL for year (maybe 10 years &#8212; have they existed that long), but never made the total switchover because I have a few lamps, including one I inherited from my grandmother, that require an incandescent shaped bulb. So&#8230;now I can finally buy CFLs for those lamps as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/ge-to-sell-energy-efficient-bulbs-in-disguise/#comment-18182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=17359#comment-18182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yes, high wattage screw in CFLs have existed for some time now:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.goodmart.com/pdfs/tcp/289hi_watt.pdf&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The 28968 is equal to a 300W incandescent.  I have them in my garage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only reason incandescents of this output level don&#039;t exist is due to the heat they would generate and the power they would consume.  Fire hazard and possible overload hazard for older homes.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, high wattage screw in CFLs have existed for some time now:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.goodmart.com/pdfs/tcp/289hi_watt.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.goodmart.com/pdfs/tcp/289hi_watt.pdf</a></p>
<p>The 28968 is equal to a 300W incandescent.  I have them in my garage.</p>
<p>The only reason incandescents of this output level don&#8217;t exist is due to the heat they would generate and the power they would consume.  Fire hazard and possible overload hazard for older homes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/ge-to-sell-energy-efficient-bulbs-in-disguise/#comment-18181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=17359#comment-18181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;100W version, really? Wouldn&#039;t that be equivalent to a 300+W incandescent, something that never even remotely existed as a traditional bulb?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100W version, really? Wouldn&#8217;t that be equivalent to a 300+W incandescent, something that never even remotely existed as a traditional bulb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/ge-to-sell-energy-efficient-bulbs-in-disguise/#comment-18180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=17359#comment-18180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&quot;So how do you get regular Joes to buy up the greener bulbs (other than stressing that they lower electricity bill costs)? Make them look a lot more like traditional incandescent bulbs — because let’s face it, people don’t like change.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Perhaps I should bow to the wiser marketing people at companies like GE and Philips. But maybe the problem isn&#039;t so much that &quot;people don&#039;t like change&quot; as much as the lamps in which people would put these bulbs are hostile to anything but the traditional bulb shape.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some lamp shades have a framework that rests directly on the round top of the bulb. Guess what no longer rests on a &quot;twisty&quot; CFL? Some lamp shades rest on harps which are not big enough to accommodate a CFL of equivalent light output (put a 60-watt incandescent next to a 15-watt twisty CFL and you&#039;ll see what I mean). Some lamps are enclosed, which, earlier on, was a no-no for CFLs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I won&#039;t even get to the problem of not being able to dim CFLs if you screw them into a typical incandescent-lamp dimmer circuit. Or the quality of the light, especially of cheaper CFLs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, there is a percentage of the U.S. populace that approaches anything new with revulsion. But there are others among us who have figured out that it&#039;s not &quot;green&quot; to use a CFL if it means you have to buy a light fixture to use it.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So how do you get regular Joes to buy up the greener bulbs (other than stressing that they lower electricity bill costs)? Make them look a lot more like traditional incandescent bulbs — because let’s face it, people don’t like change.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps I should bow to the wiser marketing people at companies like GE and Philips. But maybe the problem isn&#8217;t so much that &#8220;people don&#8217;t like change&#8221; as much as the lamps in which people would put these bulbs are hostile to anything but the traditional bulb shape.</p>
<p>Some lamp shades have a framework that rests directly on the round top of the bulb. Guess what no longer rests on a &#8220;twisty&#8221; CFL? Some lamp shades rest on harps which are not big enough to accommodate a CFL of equivalent light output (put a 60-watt incandescent next to a 15-watt twisty CFL and you&#8217;ll see what I mean). Some lamps are enclosed, which, earlier on, was a no-no for CFLs.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t even get to the problem of not being able to dim CFLs if you screw them into a typical incandescent-lamp dimmer circuit. Or the quality of the light, especially of cheaper CFLs.</p>
<p>Yes, there is a percentage of the U.S. populace that approaches anything new with revulsion. But there are others among us who have figured out that it&#8217;s not &#8220;green&#8221; to use a CFL if it means you have to buy a light fixture to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

