<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAQ: The McCain Energy Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/#comment-12352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2171#comment-12352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;That is an interesting plan but who will pay for the 300+ miles of wind farms that I&#039;ll be driving by when I back home during breaks. I can&#039;t imagine covering the entire midwest with them could be great for wildlife and the cost would be outrageous, even for Mr. Pickens. There&#039;s a much brighter future in Nuclear energy (even though I believe wind should play a part) if people would give it a chance. The potential of this industry is the best of any alternative energy and we&#039;re being left in the dust. Why is that the only people that seem to be fighting Nuclear power are those who know nothing about it except Chernobyl (even though the don&#039;t even know the details behind that).&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an interesting plan but who will pay for the 300+ miles of wind farms that I&#8217;ll be driving by when I back home during breaks. I can&#8217;t imagine covering the entire midwest with them could be great for wildlife and the cost would be outrageous, even for Mr. Pickens. There&#8217;s a much brighter future in Nuclear energy (even though I believe wind should play a part) if people would give it a chance. The potential of this industry is the best of any alternative energy and we&#8217;re being left in the dust. Why is that the only people that seem to be fighting Nuclear power are those who know nothing about it except Chernobyl (even though the don&#8217;t even know the details behind that).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hib Casselberry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/#comment-12351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hib Casselberry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2171#comment-12351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Both my wife &amp; I are for Wind Energy for electric use and natural gas for transportation. We approve the PickensPlan! Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can sign in using your email address here:
http://push.pickensplan.com/?xgsi=1&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks,
PickensPlan&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both my wife &amp; I are for Wind Energy for electric use and natural gas for transportation. We approve the PickensPlan! Thank you.</p>
<p>You can sign in using your email address here:<br />
<a href="http://push.pickensplan.com/?xgsi=1" rel="nofollow">http://push.pickensplan.com/?xgsi=1</a></p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
PickensPlan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cele</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/#comment-12350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cele]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2171#comment-12350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Fantastic!  I just relate to the Democratic administrations killing funding on energy research,(Clinton, Carter) and programs tanking, some in the works for 20 years and in the hundreds of millions producing results. The Democrats even killed the nuclear waste programs to remove all spent fuels from power plants.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nuclear workers are a small group of a few thousand in the US that do &quot;hands on&quot;. The history of feast or famine, the death of good programs, the 75,000 scientific workforce that Clinton laid off in 1995 were working on everything from biofuels and related technologies, alternative energies, to nuclear waste.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I admit I perceive Democrats as anti-nuclear. Politics was a dirty word at DOE facilities but we knew when a Democrat was elected, we would lose funding like clockwork.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also get stero-typed as not being an environmentalist because I am not a left wing liberal. That could not be further from the truth.  I agree that Republicans have typically not made the environment a high enough priority.  But then, people generally are the ones that dump and litter and leave the trash aren&#039;t they? People need to clean up their mess and care.  These bigger messes we have made, take support from all as well. If we could have agreed sooner, it would have already been done. No offense intended to anyone.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic!  I just relate to the Democratic administrations killing funding on energy research,(Clinton, Carter) and programs tanking, some in the works for 20 years and in the hundreds of millions producing results. The Democrats even killed the nuclear waste programs to remove all spent fuels from power plants.</p>
<p>Nuclear workers are a small group of a few thousand in the US that do &#8220;hands on&#8221;. The history of feast or famine, the death of good programs, the 75,000 scientific workforce that Clinton laid off in 1995 were working on everything from biofuels and related technologies, alternative energies, to nuclear waste.</p>
<p>I admit I perceive Democrats as anti-nuclear. Politics was a dirty word at DOE facilities but we knew when a Democrat was elected, we would lose funding like clockwork.</p>
<p>I also get stero-typed as not being an environmentalist because I am not a left wing liberal. That could not be further from the truth.  I agree that Republicans have typically not made the environment a high enough priority.  But then, people generally are the ones that dump and litter and leave the trash aren&#8217;t they? People need to clean up their mess and care.  These bigger messes we have made, take support from all as well. If we could have agreed sooner, it would have already been done. No offense intended to anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/#comment-12349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2171#comment-12349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Cele, I agree with everything that you said except the unilateral accusation that being a democrat makes me somehow ignorant as to the benefits of nuclear energy.  There are those of us on the left side of the aisle that also realize that nuclear is the only sensible solution for the country&#039;s energy problem, too!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cele, I agree with everything that you said except the unilateral accusation that being a democrat makes me somehow ignorant as to the benefits of nuclear energy.  There are those of us on the left side of the aisle that also realize that nuclear is the only sensible solution for the country&#8217;s energy problem, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Campaign Watch: Obama in Detroit &#38; Schwarzenegger Blasts McCain &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/#comment-12348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green Campaign Watch: Obama in Detroit &#38; Schwarzenegger Blasts McCain &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2171#comment-12348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] In case you were getting tired of clicking back and forth between our takes on Obama&#8217;s and McCain&#8217;s energy plans, this could be [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In case you were getting tired of clicking back and forth between our takes on Obama&#8217;s and McCain&#8217;s energy plans, this could be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cele</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/#comment-12347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cele]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2171#comment-12347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The nuclear fears are so unwarranted. Chernobyl was a disaster because the plant operator doing a scheduled test took the reactor out of automated control mode and tried to operate the plant manually. No person can respond as fast as a computer. The Russian nuclear program runs their reactors at a higher level of K-effective than the US NRC programs promote. We run just under 1.0 K-effective. 1.0 is a value when the reactor can sustain itself in nuclear fission. The Soviets always ran their reactors above 1.0. So you see, expecting a human to manage a reactor&#039;s fissioning in manual mode when already operating above 1.0 is so absolutely insane, yes the reactor went critical and caused a world wide impact. The US has so many safety features we will not ever do this.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please do not bring up Three Mile Island. I worked on cleanup there. Again, an inexperienced operator doing a routine startup during training took the system from automative controls into manual controls and shut down the cooling system on the core. Yes, it melted the core, made a huge mess. But the reactor building never lost integrity and no nuclear materials was ever exposed the public or left the facilities.  The &quot;explosion&quot; was a steam explosion in side the reactor building. This happens in many industries using steam. Ignorance breeds fear. The US nuclear program has the safest track record of any industry and that should tell you something about the folks who are afraid because it is a vogue political view and a scientifically correct point of view. We used to call backwards thinking people a bunch of hicks. Now we call them politically correct Democrats and environmentalists.  Hey you guys know less about what you are suggesting than you should that you are so totally against. We are capable of being the world leader in nuclear and we once were. Now France owns our best technologies and uses them. Nuclear is safer than any chemical solution by far.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am 54, worked in the nuclear industry doing some of the most scariest talked about things with nuclear materials. I did it safely, with good equipment and know how to handle nuclear materials. You have to respect them that is for sure, but they offer energy, clean, carbon neutral energy and we have a near infinite supply of nuclear resources. Had we got the public on board in the 1980&#039;s we could be like France and have 80% of our electricity coming from a clean source and have never generated all the green house gases these past 30 years. Global warming would perhaps not be so devastating. Hind sight is a killer, eyt we continue on in ignorance and rhetoric. Take someone&#039;s insights and advice that has worked hands on knee deep in nuclear wastes, managing and handing special nuclear materials, working to clean up the cold war wastes for the sake of our environment. I deserve your attention.  Nuclear energy is the safest production of electrical energy and our country is rich in nuclear energy. So who is stopping this from happening? The politically correct or the ignorant? I have listened to the ignorance until we are drowning in it. Gen X is suppose to a smart generation so prove it. What has the Gen X developed that is better than my old generation anyway? Make a list. Commit your lives as others have for the sake of gaining energy knowledge that all the workers have in DOE programs for nuclear developments. Then listen to that vast uninformed ignorance permeating the public for liberal political glory and Dr. No who wants to be our president. We can not afford NO any more. We need courageous and positive thinkers. Nuclear is a natural energy source  and it emits nothing chemically. It is greener than the cars you drive and plastic wrappers on everything you dispose of and the Styrofoam cups which never decay that you buy and use, and the palm oil microwave popcorn you will eat without remorse of the 160 species endangered by loss of territory from palm oil exploits. Be thinkers and really look at what habits we all have created and what we OK and what we frown on.  None of us has a plan for our own bad habits.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nuclear fears are so unwarranted. Chernobyl was a disaster because the plant operator doing a scheduled test took the reactor out of automated control mode and tried to operate the plant manually. No person can respond as fast as a computer. The Russian nuclear program runs their reactors at a higher level of K-effective than the US NRC programs promote. We run just under 1.0 K-effective. 1.0 is a value when the reactor can sustain itself in nuclear fission. The Soviets always ran their reactors above 1.0. So you see, expecting a human to manage a reactor&#8217;s fissioning in manual mode when already operating above 1.0 is so absolutely insane, yes the reactor went critical and caused a world wide impact. The US has so many safety features we will not ever do this.</p>
<p>Please do not bring up Three Mile Island. I worked on cleanup there. Again, an inexperienced operator doing a routine startup during training took the system from automative controls into manual controls and shut down the cooling system on the core. Yes, it melted the core, made a huge mess. But the reactor building never lost integrity and no nuclear materials was ever exposed the public or left the facilities.  The &#8220;explosion&#8221; was a steam explosion in side the reactor building. This happens in many industries using steam. Ignorance breeds fear. The US nuclear program has the safest track record of any industry and that should tell you something about the folks who are afraid because it is a vogue political view and a scientifically correct point of view. We used to call backwards thinking people a bunch of hicks. Now we call them politically correct Democrats and environmentalists.  Hey you guys know less about what you are suggesting than you should that you are so totally against. We are capable of being the world leader in nuclear and we once were. Now France owns our best technologies and uses them. Nuclear is safer than any chemical solution by far.</p>
<p>I am 54, worked in the nuclear industry doing some of the most scariest talked about things with nuclear materials. I did it safely, with good equipment and know how to handle nuclear materials. You have to respect them that is for sure, but they offer energy, clean, carbon neutral energy and we have a near infinite supply of nuclear resources. Had we got the public on board in the 1980&#8242;s we could be like France and have 80% of our electricity coming from a clean source and have never generated all the green house gases these past 30 years. Global warming would perhaps not be so devastating. Hind sight is a killer, eyt we continue on in ignorance and rhetoric. Take someone&#8217;s insights and advice that has worked hands on knee deep in nuclear wastes, managing and handing special nuclear materials, working to clean up the cold war wastes for the sake of our environment. I deserve your attention.  Nuclear energy is the safest production of electrical energy and our country is rich in nuclear energy. So who is stopping this from happening? The politically correct or the ignorant? I have listened to the ignorance until we are drowning in it. Gen X is suppose to a smart generation so prove it. What has the Gen X developed that is better than my old generation anyway? Make a list. Commit your lives as others have for the sake of gaining energy knowledge that all the workers have in DOE programs for nuclear developments. Then listen to that vast uninformed ignorance permeating the public for liberal political glory and Dr. No who wants to be our president. We can not afford NO any more. We need courageous and positive thinkers. Nuclear is a natural energy source  and it emits nothing chemically. It is greener than the cars you drive and plastic wrappers on everything you dispose of and the Styrofoam cups which never decay that you buy and use, and the palm oil microwave popcorn you will eat without remorse of the 160 species endangered by loss of territory from palm oil exploits. Be thinkers and really look at what habits we all have created and what we OK and what we frown on.  None of us has a plan for our own bad habits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobgil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/#comment-12346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobgil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2171#comment-12346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The fact is that creating new sources (PLURAL) of alternative energy will be the defining acheivemnt of the next decade or so. Global warming, high oil &amp; gas prices ruining the economy, plus reliance on oil from politically unstable areas all mean we have to DO EVERYTHING STARTING NOW. Debating which method will be best is a waste of time and a poor excuse for doing nothing.
We do not know which COMBINATION OF METHODS will work, but we don&#039;t have time to debate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By the way, like it or not, any Republican including McCain will be bound to the energy policies of the Bush/Cheney Disaster. We cannot take that chance. He&#039;s a good man, but his hands are too tied by party politics.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is that creating new sources (PLURAL) of alternative energy will be the defining acheivemnt of the next decade or so. Global warming, high oil &amp; gas prices ruining the economy, plus reliance on oil from politically unstable areas all mean we have to DO EVERYTHING STARTING NOW. Debating which method will be best is a waste of time and a poor excuse for doing nothing.<br />
We do not know which COMBINATION OF METHODS will work, but we don&#8217;t have time to debate.</p>
<p>By the way, like it or not, any Republican including McCain will be bound to the energy policies of the Bush/Cheney Disaster. We cannot take that chance. He&#8217;s a good man, but his hands are too tied by party politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAQ: The Obama Energy Plan &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/#comment-12345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FAQ: The Obama Energy Plan &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2171#comment-12345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] use the office of the president to accelerate our transition to a greener economy. We profiled Sen. John McCain&#8217;s energy plan earlier, and since energy will almost certainly not get as much debate time as Iraq, health care or [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] use the office of the president to accelerate our transition to a greener economy. We profiled Sen. John McCain&#8217;s energy plan earlier, and since energy will almost certainly not get as much debate time as Iraq, health care or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armando</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/#comment-12344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armando]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2171#comment-12344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sold on cap and trade. I&#039;d rather have him strive to be the energy independence candidate instead of the environmental candidate.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sold on cap and trade. I&#8217;d rather have him strive to be the energy independence candidate instead of the environmental candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-the-mccain-energy-plan/#comment-12343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=2171#comment-12343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If we (as a country and as a humanity) do not build more nuclear power plants, we will build more coal-fired ones, and exacerbate the GHG emission problem further.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In theory, we could also use less energy, but I&#039;m not holding my breath on that one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Solar and wind are incapable of provide baseline power without even higher costs, and so remain out of reach economically at the present time.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we (as a country and as a humanity) do not build more nuclear power plants, we will build more coal-fired ones, and exacerbate the GHG emission problem further.</p>
<p>In theory, we could also use less energy, but I&#8217;m not holding my breath on that one.</p>
<p>Solar and wind are incapable of provide baseline power without even higher costs, and so remain out of reach economically at the present time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

