<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAQ: Carbon Capture &amp; Sequestration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Sprout</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/#comment-9098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daily Sprout]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2008/01/07/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration/#comment-9098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Starts Up CO2-Cutting Operations: Skyonic, a startup which has developed a post-combustion system that pulls CO2 out of power plants and spits out sodium bicarbonate [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Starts Up CO2-Cutting Operations: Skyonic, a startup which has developed a post-combustion system that pulls CO2 out of power plants and spits out sodium bicarbonate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: durgametals</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/#comment-9097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[durgametals]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2008/01/07/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration/#comment-9097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Durga Metal Profiles is Manufacturers and suppliers of Drum Scrubber, Vibro Feeder and Log washer in India.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Durga Metal Profiles is Manufacturers and suppliers of Drum Scrubber, Vibro Feeder and Log washer in India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOE Doles Out Close to $1B for Commercial-scale Carbon Capture</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/#comment-9096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DOE Doles Out Close to $1B for Commercial-scale Carbon Capture]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2008/01/07/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration/#comment-9096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] carbon capture and sequestration projects valued at a total of $3.18 billion have scored $979 million in stimulus funds, according to a [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] carbon capture and sequestration projects valued at a total of $3.18 billion have scored $979 million in stimulus funds, according to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Controversial FutureGen Carbon Capture Demo Gets a &#8220;Rapid Restart&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/#comment-9095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Controversial FutureGen Carbon Capture Demo Gets a &#8220;Rapid Restart&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2008/01/07/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration/#comment-9095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] anything but smooth sailing. Plans for a 275 MW coal-fired power plant equipped with experimental carbon capture technology ran hugely over budget in the early stages, and hit a dead end when the Bush administration pulled [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] anything but smooth sailing. Plans for a 275 MW coal-fired power plant equipped with experimental carbon capture technology ran hugely over budget in the early stages, and hit a dead end when the Bush administration pulled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOE Hands Out Cleaner Coal Funding, $30M to Berkeley Lab</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/#comment-9094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DOE Hands Out Cleaner Coal Funding, $30M to Berkeley Lab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2008/01/07/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration/#comment-9094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] plans to provide $30 million to set up two new research centers focused on next-generation carbon capture and sequestration technology at the Lawrence Berkeley National [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plans to provide $30 million to set up two new research centers focused on next-generation carbon capture and sequestration technology at the Lawrence Berkeley National [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 60 Minutes on “Clean Coal” Misses the Innovators [Earth2Tech] &#124; BYOHosting.com Blogs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/#comment-9093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[60 Minutes on “Clean Coal” Misses the Innovators [Earth2Tech] &#124; BYOHosting.com Blogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2008/01/07/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration/#comment-9093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] No mention of PowerSpan, which recently raised $50 million from investors like George Soros and NGEN Partners, or GreatPoint Energy, which was one of the most well-funded cleantech startups around. The piece was short, so perhaps they didn&#8217;t have time, but they had the perfect opportunity to take a brief look at the new players when Rogers admitted that Duke, despite pledging to reduce its carbon footprint, has not spent any money investing in the technology of carbon capture and sequestration. For more info on CCS, read our FAQ. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No mention of PowerSpan, which recently raised $50 million from investors like George Soros and NGEN Partners, or GreatPoint Energy, which was one of the most well-funded cleantech startups around. The piece was short, so perhaps they didn&#8217;t have time, but they had the perfect opportunity to take a brief look at the new players when Rogers admitted that Duke, despite pledging to reduce its carbon footprint, has not spent any money investing in the technology of carbon capture and sequestration. For more info on CCS, read our FAQ. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 60 Minutes on &#8220;Clean Coal&#8221; Misses the Innovators</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/#comment-9092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[60 Minutes on &#8220;Clean Coal&#8221; Misses the Innovators]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2008/01/07/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration/#comment-9092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] No mention of PowerSpan, which recently raised $50 million from investors like George Soros and NGEN Partners, or GreatPoint Energy, which was one of the most well-funded cleantech startups around. The piece was short, so perhaps they didn&#8217;t have time, but they had the perfect opportunity to take a brief look at the new players when Rogers admitted that Duke, despite pledging to reduce its carbon footprint, has not spent any money investing in the technology of carbon capture and sequestration. For more info on CCS, read our FAQ. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No mention of PowerSpan, which recently raised $50 million from investors like George Soros and NGEN Partners, or GreatPoint Energy, which was one of the most well-funded cleantech startups around. The piece was short, so perhaps they didn&#8217;t have time, but they had the perfect opportunity to take a brief look at the new players when Rogers admitted that Duke, despite pledging to reduce its carbon footprint, has not spent any money investing in the technology of carbon capture and sequestration. For more info on CCS, read our FAQ. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAQ: The Climate &#38; Energy Bill Debate</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/#comment-9091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FAQ: The Climate &#38; Energy Bill Debate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2008/01/07/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration/#comment-9091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] for large-scale deployment of carbon capture and storage technology. Gingrich came out in favor of carbon capture and sequestration (he actually called it &#8220;green coal,&#8221; an oxymoron if ever there was one) in his [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for large-scale deployment of carbon capture and storage technology. Gingrich came out in favor of carbon capture and sequestration (he actually called it &#8220;green coal,&#8221; an oxymoron if ever there was one) in his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exxon to Spend $170M on Carbon Capture, Storage Technology &#124; Alternative Energy News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/#comment-9090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Exxon to Spend $170M on Carbon Capture, Storage Technology &#124; Alternative Energy News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2008/01/07/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration/#comment-9090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] — combined with expertise acquired during decades of dabbling in carbon sequestration (see our FAQ on the technology) — could give Exxon an odd lead in the race to devise emissions-control technologies ahead of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] — combined with expertise acquired during decades of dabbling in carbon sequestration (see our FAQ on the technology) — could give Exxon an odd lead in the race to devise emissions-control technologies ahead of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exxon to Spend $170M on Carbon Capture, Storage Technology &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration-1/#comment-9089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Exxon to Spend $170M on Carbon Capture, Storage Technology &#171; Earth2Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2008/01/07/faq-carbon-capture-sequestration/#comment-9089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] combined with expertise acquired during decades of dabbling in carbon sequestration (see our FAQ on the technology) &#8212; could give Exxon an odd lead in the race to devise emissions-control technologies ahead of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] combined with expertise acquired during decades of dabbling in carbon sequestration (see our FAQ on the technology) &#8212; could give Exxon an odd lead in the race to devise emissions-control technologies ahead of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

