<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco to FCC: 5 Suggestions for the Smart Grid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 20:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Ayers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/#comment-30369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Ayers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=50630#comment-30369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;From Tropos&#039; perspective, we wholeheartedly agree with Cisco’s recommendations to the FCC. Tropos has also been active in submission of comments to the FCC in meetings and formal response to Public Notices related to the value of broadband for building Smart Grids and Smart Cities.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of the controversial topics we have heard raised numerous times is the issue as to whether the FCC should allocate wireless spectrum specifically for utilities to use for Smart Grid – a new licensed spectrum. We agree with Cisco’s position on this issue – while it could be valuable, it’s just not needed. There is sufficient bandwidth and quality of service available with today’s unlicensed band which includes 2.4 and 5.8 GHz for regional scale distribution area networks. Unlicensed 900 MHz is already widely used for neighborhood area networks to support metering LANs and has proven to be quite effective. From a cost perspective, use of unlicensed spectrum for the Smart Grid translates to less cost for utilities as they don’t need purchase an expensive use license. Different unlicensed options play a valuable role within the Smart Grid context and we believe utilities should be allowed the freedom to select the best solutions – including licensed and unlicensed spectrum, that best meet their specific requirements. Therefore, Tropos continues to recommend to the FCC that if licensed spectrum is allocated for utilities, it should be an option but not a mandate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Based upon our vast experience in deployment of distribution area networks, the concerns raised by some parties as it relates to interference in unlicensed spectrum, is unfounded. You can check out Tropos’comments submitted to the FCC which highlights one of our Silicon Valley customers that has successfully mitigated interference issues in a very challenging interference environment at:  http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view;jsessionid=Ls7LnfsclZT0x0VDPpYrh2Jw1nYGypjKLyK2h3xwysqnMY9BWtbR!-1549589894!-2048476872?id=7020040355&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In addition, among Tropos’ customers are many utilities that are successfully using unlicensed spectrum for multiple applications across urban, suburban, and even less populated regions. Such utility-specific applications include backhaul for smart meter LANS, distribution automation, substation security, power quality monitoring, and mobile workforce applications (scheduling, GIS, etc.). The Tropos wireless broadband network provides the needed reliability, performance, security, and quality of service dictated by utilities.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We look forward to the recommendations Nick Sinai, the FCC’s Energy and Environment Director, will be presenting to the FCC for how to bring broadband to the Smart Grid as part of the National Broadband Plan in March – it undoubtedly could have significant impact on the flexibility and options U.S. utilities will have as they deploy Smart Grid communications.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tom&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Tropos&#8217; perspective, we wholeheartedly agree with Cisco’s recommendations to the FCC. Tropos has also been active in submission of comments to the FCC in meetings and formal response to Public Notices related to the value of broadband for building Smart Grids and Smart Cities.</p>
<p>One of the controversial topics we have heard raised numerous times is the issue as to whether the FCC should allocate wireless spectrum specifically for utilities to use for Smart Grid – a new licensed spectrum. We agree with Cisco’s position on this issue – while it could be valuable, it’s just not needed. There is sufficient bandwidth and quality of service available with today’s unlicensed band which includes 2.4 and 5.8 GHz for regional scale distribution area networks. Unlicensed 900 MHz is already widely used for neighborhood area networks to support metering LANs and has proven to be quite effective. From a cost perspective, use of unlicensed spectrum for the Smart Grid translates to less cost for utilities as they don’t need purchase an expensive use license. Different unlicensed options play a valuable role within the Smart Grid context and we believe utilities should be allowed the freedom to select the best solutions – including licensed and unlicensed spectrum, that best meet their specific requirements. Therefore, Tropos continues to recommend to the FCC that if licensed spectrum is allocated for utilities, it should be an option but not a mandate.</p>
<p>Based upon our vast experience in deployment of distribution area networks, the concerns raised by some parties as it relates to interference in unlicensed spectrum, is unfounded. You can check out Tropos’comments submitted to the FCC which highlights one of our Silicon Valley customers that has successfully mitigated interference issues in a very challenging interference environment at:  <a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view;jsessionid=Ls7LnfsclZT0x0VDPpYrh2Jw1nYGypjKLyK2h3xwysqnMY9BWtbR!-1549589894!-2048476872?id=7020040355" rel="nofollow">http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view;jsessionid=Ls7LnfsclZT0x0VDPpYrh2Jw1nYGypjKLyK2h3xwysqnMY9BWtbR!-1549589894!-2048476872?id=7020040355</a></p>
<p>In addition, among Tropos’ customers are many utilities that are successfully using unlicensed spectrum for multiple applications across urban, suburban, and even less populated regions. Such utility-specific applications include backhaul for smart meter LANS, distribution automation, substation security, power quality monitoring, and mobile workforce applications (scheduling, GIS, etc.). The Tropos wireless broadband network provides the needed reliability, performance, security, and quality of service dictated by utilities.</p>
<p>We look forward to the recommendations Nick Sinai, the FCC’s Energy and Environment Director, will be presenting to the FCC for how to bring broadband to the Smart Grid as part of the National Broadband Plan in March – it undoubtedly could have significant impact on the flexibility and options U.S. utilities will have as they deploy Smart Grid communications.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earth2Tech Week in Review</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/#comment-30368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Earth2Tech Week in Review]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=50630#comment-30368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Cisco to FCC: 5 Suggestions for the Smart Grid: The Federal Communications Commission plans to make recommendations for how the National Broadband Plan should help shape the fledgling smart grid industry, and this week Cisco submitted a couple of key suggestions to the FCC. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cisco to FCC: 5 Suggestions for the Smart Grid: The Federal Communications Commission plans to make recommendations for how the National Broadband Plan should help shape the fledgling smart grid industry, and this week Cisco submitted a couple of key suggestions to the FCC. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart Grid Security: Little Debate, Lots of Money</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/#comment-30367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smart Grid Security: Little Debate, Lots of Money]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=50630#comment-30367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] standards bodies are taking it extremely seriously, and it&#8217;s clear that many companies are looking to the IT industry for cues on the [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] standards bodies are taking it extremely seriously, and it&#8217;s clear that many companies are looking to the IT industry for cues on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grid and regulation &#171; Trends Project</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/#comment-30366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grid and regulation &#171; Trends Project]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=50630#comment-30366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] February 4, 2010 by trendsproject    http://earth2tech.com/2010/02/02/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/   [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 4, 2010 by trendsproject    <a href="http://earth2tech.com/2010/02/02/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/  " rel="nofollow">http://earth2tech.com/2010/02/02/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/  </a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart Grid Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cisco to FCC: 5 Suggestions for the Smart Grid</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/#comment-30365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smart Grid Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cisco to FCC: 5 Suggestions for the Smart Grid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=50630#comment-30365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] via Cisco to FCC: 5 Suggestions for the Smart Grid. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Cisco to FCC: 5 Suggestions for the Smart Grid. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Blanford</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/cisco-to-fcc-5-suggestions-for-the-smart-grid/#comment-30364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T. Blanford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=50630#comment-30364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The Smart Grid project does not need suppliers of proprietary systems or equipment such as has occurred with Microsoft. It also does not need a bunch of Patent Trolls acting as obstructionists at every turn. There is no need for a plethora of standards beyond what is reasonably required to address each connection/transmission requirement efficiently.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My hope is that, in terms of software as well as hardware, both can be delivered on an open source basis and at minimum cost. As an example, I&#039;m afraid the alternative is what you see here at $800 to $900 a copy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://energymeasurement.com/wem.htm&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Smart Grid project does not need suppliers of proprietary systems or equipment such as has occurred with Microsoft. It also does not need a bunch of Patent Trolls acting as obstructionists at every turn. There is no need for a plethora of standards beyond what is reasonably required to address each connection/transmission requirement efficiently.</p>
<p>My hope is that, in terms of software as well as hardware, both can be delivered on an open source basis and at minimum cost. As an example, I&#8217;m afraid the alternative is what you see here at $800 to $900 a copy.</p>
<p><a href="http://energymeasurement.com/wem.htm" rel="nofollow">http://energymeasurement.com/wem.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

