<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon Footprint of Spam: Hello, the Internet Uses Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-footprint-of-spam-hello-the-internet-uses-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-footprint-of-spam-hello-the-internet-uses-energy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cada missatge enviat per Twitter genera 0,02 grams de CO2 &#124; L’home dibuixat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-footprint-of-spam-hello-the-internet-uses-energy/#comment-22125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cada missatge enviat per Twitter genera 0,02 grams de CO2 &#124; L’home dibuixat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=29021#comment-22125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] 1 tona de CO2.En comparació, una cerca a Google consumeix 1.000 joules (0,2 grams de CO2) i cada missatge de correu brossa 0,3 grams de CO2.Entrades relacionades:Mineria de dades i Twitter (23 gener 2009)Suplantació de comptes a Twitter [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1 tona de CO2.En comparació, una cerca a Google consumeix 1.000 joules (0,2 grams de CO2) i cada missatge de correu brossa 0,3 grams de CO2.Entrades relacionades:Mineria de dades i Twitter (23 gener 2009)Suplantació de comptes a Twitter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Much Energy Per Tweet? &#124; Gadget Public Informations</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-footprint-of-spam-hello-the-internet-uses-energy/#comment-22124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Much Energy Per Tweet? &#124; Gadget Public Informations]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=29021#comment-22124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] search query has been found to consume about 1 kilojoule per query, which emits 0.2 grams of CO2. And according to a recent study each spam email message emits 0.3 grams of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] search query has been found to consume about 1 kilojoule per query, which emits 0.2 grams of CO2. And according to a recent study each spam email message emits 0.3 grams of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Each Tweet Emits About 0.02 grams of Carbon Dioxide - Rocking Team</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-footprint-of-spam-hello-the-internet-uses-energy/#comment-22123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Each Tweet Emits About 0.02 grams of Carbon Dioxide - Rocking Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=29021#comment-22123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] search query has been found to consume about 1 kilojoule per query, which emits 0.2 grams of CO2. And according to a recent study each spam email message emits 0.3 grams of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] search query has been found to consume about 1 kilojoule per query, which emits 0.2 grams of CO2. And according to a recent study each spam email message emits 0.3 grams of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Much Energy Per Tweet?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-footprint-of-spam-hello-the-internet-uses-energy/#comment-22122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Much Energy Per Tweet?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=29021#comment-22122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] search query has been found to consume about 1 kilojoule per query, which emits 0.2 grams of CO2. And according to a recent study each spam email message emits 0.3 grams of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] search query has been found to consume about 1 kilojoule per query, which emits 0.2 grams of CO2. And according to a recent study each spam email message emits 0.3 grams of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Internet Saves/Sucks Energy Round 3: Google Defends Power Use</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-footprint-of-spam-hello-the-internet-uses-energy/#comment-22121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Internet Saves/Sucks Energy Round 3: Google Defends Power Use]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=29021#comment-22121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] process that&#8217;s the most important part. Last month I posted the (slightly cheeky) story Carbon Footprint of Spam: Hello, the Internet Uses Energy in response to a study sponsored by computer security firm McAfee on the energy consumption of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] process that&#8217;s the most important part. Last month I posted the (slightly cheeky) story Carbon Footprint of Spam: Hello, the Internet Uses Energy in response to a study sponsored by computer security firm McAfee on the energy consumption of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechWrap &#187; A Decade of Startup Tours and the Evolution of Technology</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-footprint-of-spam-hello-the-internet-uses-energy/#comment-22120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TechWrap &#187; A Decade of Startup Tours and the Evolution of Technology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=29021#comment-22120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Pac-Man game, are quaint at best. The economic crisis, global warming and the realization that technology is an energy hog may be why I&#8217;m learning just as much about a startup&#8217;s carbon footprint as I am about [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pac-Man game, are quaint at best. The economic crisis, global warming and the realization that technology is an energy hog may be why I&#8217;m learning just as much about a startup&#8217;s carbon footprint as I am about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Decade of Startup Tours and the Evolution of Technology</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-footprint-of-spam-hello-the-internet-uses-energy/#comment-22119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Decade of Startup Tours and the Evolution of Technology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=29021#comment-22119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Pac-Man game, are quaint at best. The economic crisis, global warming and the realization that technology is an energy hog may be why I&#8217;m learning just as much about a startup&#8217;s carbon footprint as I am about [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pac-Man game, are quaint at best. The economic crisis, global warming and the realization that technology is an energy hog may be why I&#8217;m learning just as much about a startup&#8217;s carbon footprint as I am about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yes, Spam Uses Energy&#8230;As Does Everything Else on the Internet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-footprint-of-spam-hello-the-internet-uses-energy/#comment-22118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yes, Spam Uses Energy&#8230;As Does Everything Else on the Internet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=29021#comment-22118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Fehrenbacher  &#124; Friday, April 17, 2009 &#124; 11:45 AM PT &#124; 0 comments    As we all know, spam sucks. And here&#8217;s another reason to hate it: Spam uses 33 billion kWh and emits 17 million metric tons of carbon per year, according to a new [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fehrenbacher  | Friday, April 17, 2009 | 11:45 AM PT | 0 comments    As we all know, spam sucks. And here&#8217;s another reason to hate it: Spam uses 33 billion kWh and emits 17 million metric tons of carbon per year, according to a new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

