<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon Capture Lite Could Cut Costs For &quot;Clean Coal&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-capture-lite-could-cut-costs-for-clean-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-capture-lite-could-cut-costs-for-clean-coal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:42:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com : Green Ink: Oil's Down, Motown Drowns</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/carbon-capture-lite-could-cut-costs-for-clean-coal/#comment-17473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Environmental Capital - WSJ.com : Green Ink: Oil's Down, Motown Drowns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=15680#comment-17473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] that partial capture of carbon emissions at clean coal plants makes economic sense and would make coal as clean as natural gas, in [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that partial capture of carbon emissions at clean coal plants makes economic sense and would make coal as clean as natural gas, in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

