<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Key to Google&#039;s Data Center Efficiency: One Backup Battery Per Server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloom Energy’s Sweet Spot: Data Center Backup?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bloom Energy’s Sweet Spot: Data Center Backup?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] as a key step to help avert a data center energy crisis. Google&#8217;s taken a crack at it with its one-battery-per-server methods, and other innovative UPS ideas are cutting inefficiencies as [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as a key step to help avert a data center energy crisis. Google&#8217;s taken a crack at it with its one-battery-per-server methods, and other innovative UPS ideas are cutting inefficiencies as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Green Data Center Strategies of Web Giants</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Green Data Center Strategies of Web Giants]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] energy efficiency in the data center. It started with the surprise announcement that the company uses custom servers with built-in batteries, helping to eliminate energy loss caused by uninterruptible power supply [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] energy efficiency in the data center. It started with the surprise announcement that the company uses custom servers with built-in batteries, helping to eliminate energy loss caused by uninterruptible power supply [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Samon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Samon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Your not seeing the entire picture. A typical setup has several large industrial UPS systems (takes up space). These are then connected to the racks by PDU systems (upwards of $2,000 each, each rack would need 4 or 5 of these units to power all the servers in the rack). That cost alone would cover batteries (which by they way only need less then 3 minutes of run time..why? Because the backup generator kicks on after 30 seconds of power loss.  So the batteries are not equivalent in power/ size to an industrial size unit).  There is more hardware in the development of a commercial UPS setup then just a large battery (a lot more).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In all they save on the ‘infrastructure’costs, saving a ton on product (all those PDU&#039;s), installation, maintenance (support contracts) and space (no way pdu&#039;s will fit in those containers). Not to mention with all those rpdus you now have more devices on the network that have to be managed..and those have a failure rate as well.  Plus, space is a huge issue with an industrial UPS application..they are saving space..saving on lighting etc).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Spec out a system from a UPS company to power the same amount of servers google has and you will see what I mean. It’s a matter of time before Dell and IBM ship with small 2-3 minute run time batteries in their servers (which can be monitored in the operating system easily – and integrated in to network node management software to alert when replacement is needed- this is already being done).&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your not seeing the entire picture. A typical setup has several large industrial UPS systems (takes up space). These are then connected to the racks by PDU systems (upwards of $2,000 each, each rack would need 4 or 5 of these units to power all the servers in the rack). That cost alone would cover batteries (which by they way only need less then 3 minutes of run time..why? Because the backup generator kicks on after 30 seconds of power loss.  So the batteries are not equivalent in power/ size to an industrial size unit).  There is more hardware in the development of a commercial UPS setup then just a large battery (a lot more).</p>
<p>In all they save on the ‘infrastructure’costs, saving a ton on product (all those PDU&#8217;s), installation, maintenance (support contracts) and space (no way pdu&#8217;s will fit in those containers). Not to mention with all those rpdus you now have more devices on the network that have to be managed..and those have a failure rate as well.  Plus, space is a huge issue with an industrial UPS application..they are saving space..saving on lighting etc).</p>
<p>Spec out a system from a UPS company to power the same amount of servers google has and you will see what I mean. It’s a matter of time before Dell and IBM ship with small 2-3 minute run time batteries in their servers (which can be monitored in the operating system easily – and integrated in to network node management software to alert when replacement is needed- this is already being done).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Batteries and the Dawn of the UPS-less Data Center</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Batteries and the Dawn of the UPS-less Data Center]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] raised eyebrows earlier this year when it revealed a custom, energy-efficient server design that allowed the search giant to work its magic without breaking the bank. The Google server (for [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] raised eyebrows earlier this year when it revealed a custom, energy-efficient server design that allowed the search giant to work its magic without breaking the bank. The Google server (for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vburke</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vburke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Subhankar, I rather suspect this was the fault of the power supplies rather than the AC waveform from the UPS (probably capacitors too small to hold up).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve had this happen with the DC inverters I use as well.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subhankar, I rather suspect this was the fault of the power supplies rather than the AC waveform from the UPS (probably capacitors too small to hold up).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had this happen with the DC inverters I use as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subhankar Ray</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Subhankar Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;At AAfter Search we have real problem with the off-the-self battery backups. They are un-reliable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apparently, their voltage waveform is not good enough to satisfy the servers. Hence, if there is an interruption, the server restarts even though the UPS passes all self-tests.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At AAfter Search we have real problem with the off-the-self battery backups. They are un-reliable.</p>
<p>Apparently, their voltage waveform is not good enough to satisfy the servers. Hence, if there is an interruption, the server restarts even though the UPS passes all self-tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bala</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bala]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Are we part of this problem??
As the bondings of google increase day by day, and to give the best possible service as the article mentions google goes with UPS(un-interrupted service) with UPS(un-interrupted supply).
So if we could  remember few of our keywords and not use google search frequently for the same set of searches and start using favourite options, will the google data-centre consume less power??&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we part of this problem??<br />
As the bondings of google increase day by day, and to give the best possible service as the article mentions google goes with UPS(un-interrupted service) with UPS(un-interrupted supply).<br />
So if we could  remember few of our keywords and not use google search frequently for the same set of searches and start using favourite options, will the google data-centre consume less power??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprint&#8217;s Route to Cutting $20M From IT Costs: Lose Old Apps</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sprint&#8217;s Route to Cutting $20M From IT Costs: Lose Old Apps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Google long kept secret its scheme for improving data center efficiency &#8212; one of its geekiest and often obsessed-about innovations &#8212; Sprint is showing some of its hand, displaying some notable accomplishments [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google long kept secret its scheme for improving data center efficiency &#8212; one of its geekiest and often obsessed-about innovations &#8212; Sprint is showing some of its hand, displaying some notable accomplishments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Cockrell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Cockrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Another BS story from Google to make themselves look good.  First a battery is a battery, is&#039;t only so efficient and it&#039;s got to be continually recharged.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google is infamous for making themselves look green while truely hammering the enviroment.  Google utilization rate on the servers usually is arround 10% so they can process data very quickly, if it were arround 70% they&#039;d process info slower by they&#039;d cut their energy bills dramatically.  Also,  they stopped cooling their servers with mechanical cooling to cut their energy.  Which sounds green until you realize their failure rates on their servers will go up by 200%.  Google makes their own servers so it&#039;s cheaper but not sustainable to the planet.  Look at the fact that according to the EPA we have more than 50 Million tons of e-waste that needs to be recycled (sent to china landfills) annually.  If everyone took Googles approach we will soon be looking at the new Love Canal, in Palo Alto. Google needs to seriously look at themselves in the mirror.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another BS story from Google to make themselves look good.  First a battery is a battery, is&#8217;t only so efficient and it&#8217;s got to be continually recharged.</p>
<p>Google is infamous for making themselves look green while truely hammering the enviroment.  Google utilization rate on the servers usually is arround 10% so they can process data very quickly, if it were arround 70% they&#8217;d process info slower by they&#8217;d cut their energy bills dramatically.  Also,  they stopped cooling their servers with mechanical cooling to cut their energy.  Which sounds green until you realize their failure rates on their servers will go up by 200%.  Google makes their own servers so it&#8217;s cheaper but not sustainable to the planet.  Look at the fact that according to the EPA we have more than 50 Million tons of e-waste that needs to be recycled (sent to china landfills) annually.  If everyone took Googles approach we will soon be looking at the new Love Canal, in Palo Alto. Google needs to seriously look at themselves in the mirror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilsko</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bilsko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Gizmodo did a little post on the one-battery-per-server story too: http://tinyurl.com/dc8b4h&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What struck me is how much more electricity the Google data center appears to consume than a typical setup.
A rule of thumb for data center consumption is 30W/sqft... but Google has 1160 servers crammed into a shipping container (either 150sqft or 300sqft, depending on whether or not its a 20 or 40ft container). Each container uses 250kW!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For comparison and perspective, baseload power for a 10 story office building in Connecticut that I&#039;ve done analysis for is just about 300kW.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gizmodo did a little post on the one-battery-per-server story too: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/dc8b4h" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/dc8b4h</a></p>
<p>What struck me is how much more electricity the Google data center appears to consume than a typical setup.<br />
A rule of thumb for data center consumption is 30W/sqft&#8230; but Google has 1160 servers crammed into a shipping container (either 150sqft or 300sqft, depending on whether or not its a 20 or 40ft container). Each container uses 250kW!</p>
<p>For comparison and perspective, baseload power for a 10 story office building in Connecticut that I&#8217;ve done analysis for is just about 300kW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Less02</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Less02]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Their savings are mainly du to the fact they don&#039;t have to convert AC to DC and reconvert DC to AC, as it is the case for standard UPS&#039;.  The batteries are installed where DC is already existing : In the equipment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To have distributed Batteries is not necessary Green though.  DC UPS distribution with DC IT equipment would be a even better idea.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their savings are mainly du to the fact they don&#8217;t have to convert AC to DC and reconvert DC to AC, as it is the case for standard UPS&#8217;.  The batteries are installed where DC is already existing : In the equipment.</p>
<p>To have distributed Batteries is not necessary Green though.  DC UPS distribution with DC IT equipment would be a even better idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Road to Savings &#187; Hello world!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Open Road to Savings &#187; Hello world!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Google has a secret. It’s their data centers. They keep the technology and locations a secret from all. Until now. The company gave a rare glimpse into how they are using an on-board, lead-acid battery for each server in the data center to create a distributed backup power system. This allows them to achieve an energy-efficient rate for the backup power supply system of over 99.9 percent. Click here for more information [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has a secret. It’s their data centers. They keep the technology and locations a secret from all. Until now. The company gave a rare glimpse into how they are using an on-board, lead-acid battery for each server in the data center to create a distributed backup power system. This allows them to achieve an energy-efficient rate for the backup power supply system of over 99.9 percent. Click here for more information [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Data Center Energy Summit recap &#171; Datacenter 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Data Center Energy Summit recap &#171; Datacenter 2.0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Earth2Tech: http://earth2tech.com/2009/04/01/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-se... [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earth2Tech: <a href="http://earth2tech.com/2009/04/01/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-se.." rel="nofollow">http://earth2tech.com/2009/04/01/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-se..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Fehrenbacher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie Fehrenbacher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Vern, Chad, it&#039;s real as far as I can tell and I did several interviews with the Google engineers there. Other publications are also reporting it as well.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vern, Chad, it&#8217;s real as far as I can tell and I did several interviews with the Google engineers there. Other publications are also reporting it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Remember, gmail was launched on April 1, 2004.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, gmail was launched on April 1, 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/cleantech/a-key-to-googles-data-center-efficiency-one-backup-battery-per-server/#comment-21495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=27648#comment-21495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Dude, its April 1st... do you really believe that google would have batteries in each server... They also have a new AI system that just came online --&gt; http://www.google.com/intl/en/landing/cadie/index.html&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, its April 1st&#8230; do you really believe that google would have batteries in each server&#8230; They also have a new AI system that just came online &#8211;&gt; <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/landing/cadie/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/intl/en/landing/cadie/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

