Two recent studies illustrate the issue, which to be fair, is complicated not just by handset manufacturers but by the carriers too, who have to test them, integrate their own services, then push them out to handsets. Having said that, all handset makers have to deal with the carriers, and several manufacturers are far faster than Samsung.

Take this Computerworld research from last week, for example. Motorola’s Android phones have waited 54.5 days on average for an upgrade to Android 2.2, or Froyo. HTC handsets fare just slightly worse at a wait of 56 days. And then there are Samsung phones, which on average, wait 159 days. And some are still waiting, even as Gingerbread, or Android 2.3 has launched: Samsung’s Galaxy S devices have faced a “coming next month” upgrade path each month since September of last year.

If statistical analysis of the calendar doesn’t sway you, perhaps some basic facts will. Yesterday, PC Magazine created a chart of the top Android phones, what version of Android they shipped with, and what version of Android they currently run. It’s easy to spot which handset manufacturer is behind the others: Samsung’s entire line of Galaxy S devices is behind the curve and in a big way. The jump from Android 2.1 to 2.2 is far more significant than the next jump after that; I’m running Gingerbread (2.3) currently, and aside from a little more polish and shine, most users won’t see a difference from the prior version until developers take advantage of new under-the-hood features.

Back to T-Mobile and the new Galaxy S 4G then: If the slow Android update cycle for Samsung devices is recognized by consumers, will that play a part in the success of T-Mobile’s newest handset? I posed that question to my Twitter followers this afternoon, and here are some of the responses:

@KevinCTofel For the average consumer doubtful, for android fans no doubt about it. Same way I feel about Dell.—
Sloan Bowman (@sloanb) January 20, 2011

@KevinCTofel The two things I constantly read about Samsung – cheap plastic feel & slow-to-no updates = no Samsung for me!—
bubbatex (@TheBubbaTex) January 20, 2011

@KevinCTofel It has scared me away from replacing my Nexus One with anything from Samsung.—
Sean Brady (@seanabrady) January 20, 2011

@KevinCTofel normals don't care. It will sell because of the 4g branding.—
Jason Smith (@ohpleaseno) January 20, 2011

There were other insightful tweets, but rather than list them all, here’s a summary for you: Early adopters and power users are leery of Samsung’s track record, but purchase decisions by newer smartphone owners won’t likely be impacted, which would be good news for T-Mobile by attracting more consumers to its fast HSPA+ network.

That’s a fair answer to the question, which may even be helped by T-Mobile announcing Thursday that its current Samsung Galaxy S phone, the Vibrant, will finally begin to see the Android 2.2 update starting tomorrow. Such news follows recent reports that Samsung was holding back the upgrade to gain more support dollars from U.S. carriers. Not so, said T-Mobile today to PC Mag, indicating that Samsung provided the update back in late November. It’s just taken until now for the operator to test and get its carrier-branded bits in the update.

Does Samsung’s history with Android updates have any impact on your decision to buy a Samsung smartphone on Google’s platform, or do you simply hope they’ll come through in the future?

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

• Why Carriers Should Care About Customer Care
• Marketing Handsets in the Superphone Era
• Why Carriers Still Hold the Key to Handset Sales

According to Engadget, iPhone user Antoni Nygaard managed to activate the hidden multi-touch gesture features on his device using the iOS 4.3 pre-release software (as well as options to change the function of the iPhone’s mute button to a rotation lock, another iPad import). BGR also has screenshots of the gestures in action and the relevant Settings screen from a separate source. Nygaard’s demonstration of the feature in action can be seen in the video below.

Apple dampened anticipation surrounding the new gestures for iPad when it noted, alongside the release of the second beta of iOS 4.3, that these would not be included in the pubic release of the update, and were intended for testing purposes only. The gestures are even less likely to make it into a public 4.3 release on the iPhone, since they aren’t an acknowledged feature of the beta.

So why is the feature there? There are those who argue that it’s because Apple is going to get rid of the home button (that adorable one with the white rounded rectangle) in future hardware iterations of the iPhone, iPad and iPod touch. It’s true that the gestures replace navigation duties normally handled by the home button, making it possible to fully use the devices without ever touching such a button. But just because it can be done, does that mean it should?

The Case For

Gestures. The presence of the gestures themselves are probably the most convincing evidence in favor of a home buttonless future for iOS devices. Why else would Apple be testing not only app switching through swipes, but also the ability to bring up the multitasking tray and to return to the home screen, both of which taken together currently make up the bulk of the home button’s duties? Feature redundancy for its own sake isn’t one of Apple’s prevailing design principles. Ever look for the physical volume knob on a Mac?

Apple Hates Buttons. The latest iPod shuffle is a rare exception, but speaking generally, Apple has a tendency to do away with physical buttons if it can get away with it. The new nano is a prime example of the culmination of Apple’s design aesthetic: a touchscreen device with a thin bezel and no buttons on its face. Its simple swipe-back navigation works fine for the nano, but is obviously too limiting for an iPhone or iPod touch. Hence the introduction of more complex multi-touch gestures on devices that allow for them, like those mentioned above.

Smaller Devices With Bigger Screens. As Kevin pointed out, Apple may start thinking about equipping the iPhone with a larger display, and soon. Four-inch and larger screens have become de rigueur on many Android devices, and while the Retina Display still gives Apple a major advantage, a bigger Retina Display would provide a bigger advantage for video and gaming enjoyment. If Apple removes the home button, it can increase screen size without adding much or any bulk to the iPhone itself.

The Case Against

Usability. As you can see from the video above, things get pretty cramped when you’re trying to use four-finger gestures on the iPhone, assuming Apple doesn’t increase the overall size of the iPhone. Even putting that aside, gestures on both the iPad and the iPhone are far from intuitive (as Jon Gruber notes), unlike a big, obvious hardware button sitting all by its lonesome on the face of the device. It’s hard to imagine Apple implementing a control scheme that requires an introductory walk-through as the default mode of getting around its mobile OS, which is the benchmark of simplicity in most other regards.

Accessibility. The home button has a very key function that probably isn’t used by most, but is important nonetheless. It can be configured to enable various accessibility options, including toggling VoiceOver, white on black, zoom modes, and having your device prompt you for a command. These are things that can’t or shouldn’t be rerouted to gestures, and that might prove confusing and awkward (read: less accessible) if attached to volume or sleep buttons.

Keeping Button Roles Clearly Defined. Apple would also have to reassign things like taking screenshots (currently done by pressing the home and sleep buttons simultaneously) and performing a hard reset (holding the home and sleep buttons simultaneously). Redirecting these functions to some combination of volume and sleep buttons would be a confusing change.

The iPod Shuffle. As mentioned, Apple went back on its buttonless iPod shuffle design after users and reviewers complained. The shuffle is a safe playground for testing new features like a buttonless interface, since consumers aren’t investing much in it and in Apple’s larger revenue picture, it represents only a very small part. It’s hard to imagine Apple taking the same chance with either the iPhone or iPad, which are revenue stars for the company and much more likely to leave a lasting bad taste in the mouth of consumers.

Home Is Where the UX Is

While Apple testing gesture controls at this juncture might indicate that the company is considering taking away the home button in future iOS devices, I think rumors of a buttonless iPhone 5 or iPad 2 are extremely premature. There’s too much at stake, and not enough potential return to justify a change like that. The home button is, in fact, at the core of why iOS devices are so easy to just pick up and use. Apple’s not going to go messing with its biggest competitive advantage and make adoption harder.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

• 5 Companies That Ruled Mobile in 2010
• 5 Connected Consumer Companies to Watch in 2011
• 5 Connected Consumer Companies That Ruled 2010

These initiatives by themselves aren’t surprising if you’ve been following along. But with Schmidt explicitly saying these are the main priorities for Google this year, it puts its various mobile efforts in better context. And it shows how much Google plans on competing in the coming years in mobile.

• Schmidt says Google needs to focus on developing fast networks like LTE, which are capable of 8-10 megabits per second download speeds, a 10x leap over 3G.  He said the boost in speed will usher in new applications, mostly entertainment and social. It’s unclear if Google actually plans on helping build out 4G networks or is just trying to encourage their development.
• A second priority is mobile payments, which Google has pushed lately with the addition of NFC support in the latest version of Android. Google is also looking at building its own mobile payments system, something we’re likely to hear more about this year.
• Third, Google is looking at increasing the availability of inexpensive smartphones around the world. As we’ve noted before, Google has a big opportunity as Android moves down market in less-developed countries. With component prices coming down and manufacturers building cheaper Android phones, this will be a big play for Google.

Google has already seen a lot of success with its mobile efforts. Android is outpacing its rivals in sales, and is poised to be the top smartphone platform. But it’s clear Google isn’t just looking to sell more phones; the company sees it can make money through mobile payments, faster mobile searches and applications. Payments, in particular, could be a huge business for Google if it can position itself as a dominant player.

The emphasis on mobile also offers a hint as to why Google was anxious to get a deal on network neutrality done. With so much riding on mobile, Google was probably eager to compromise on the issue, which deals with how operators can discriminate on traffic moving across their networks, in order to get some rules in place before it waded too deeply into the mobile market where the rules were non-existent.

Google is still primarily a search business with mobile a small but significant fraction of the pie. But as Schmidt has said before, mobile holds a huge promise for Google. “If we have a billion people using Android, you think we can’t make money from that?” asked Schmidt last year. It appears Google is anxious to find out.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub. req.):

• Why RIM’s Future (Unfortunately) Hinges on BlackBerry OS 6
• Will Killer Apps Affect Which Handsets Consumers Buy?
• How Carriers Can Crack the App Discoverability Nut

Liquavista displays reduce power consumption much like the Pixel Qi screens currently found in the Notion Ink Adam tablet and Qualcomm’s promising Mirasol display technology. Instead of the standard option of using a backlight to brighten the display, a Liquavista screen has three options: reflective, transmissive and transflective. Indoors, the screen can act just like a traditional LCD display while outdoors, natural light can be reflected through the pixels for clarity and brightness, without a backlight consuming any power. Transmissive is the typical backlit technology LCDs have used for years, while using natural, passive light for reflective displays is a more recent development. Transflective both reflects and transmits light as needed to save power while still displaying a high-quality image.

So Liquavista has both a power-efficient solution and is outdoor-friendly. But how can an e-Ink type of display be used on mobile devices such as smartphones or tablets? The company says its electrowetting technology can refresh a screen up to 60 times per second, opening the door to the high frame rates needed for gaming, video consumption and other media activities on a handheld device. An early prototype Liquavista display was filmed by the BBC last year, and about halfway through the video, you can see a few examples of full-screen, color video playback.

Such frame-rates open the door for Samsung to incorporate Liquavista’s electrowetting technology into handsets, which could help boost battery life. Samsung currently uses its Super AMOLED technology in its Galaxy S line of smartphones, the Nexus S, and its two Windows Phone 7 devices. Super AMOLED is also a power-efficient technology, but can’t leverage the outdoor properties of Liquavista’s screens, so future Samsung handsets could look just as good outside as they do indoors, if not better.

Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

• Irrational Exuberance Over E-Books?
• Mobile Operators’ Strategies for Connected Devices
• Report: Mobile Augmented Reality Today and Tomorrow

The evidence comes via an image asset included in the new beta called “homescreenOverlayFaceTime~ipad.png,” which clearly shows icons for FaceTime, Camera and Photo Booth on the default iPad home screen. The image mirrors the one currently used in the iPad’s wallpaper settings, and is likely meant to replace it in the iPad 2.

FaceTime should work as it does on the iPod touch with the new iPad, letting users make video calls to others with iOS devices with front-facing cameras, or to those with FaceTime for Mac installed on their computers. Photo Booth, which Apple has yet to release on any iOS device, will presumably work like the desktop app that ships with OS X and allow users to snap photos of themselves using a front-facing camera and then apply various effects to the resulting image. Filters like Mirror, X-Ray and Kaleidoscope have already been found in the iOS 4.3 beta.

The inclusion of a separate Camera app is what suggests Apple will go ahead and include two cameras instead of just one. It’s true that it could just be for use with the front camera, but I’d suggest that Apple would’ve stuck with just the Photo Booth app if it were only including a front-facing camera. And evidence aside, a lack of a rear-facing camera, no matter how practical, would be ammunition for Apple’s competition in the tablet space. Plus, Apple couldn’t sell the ability to switch between front and back cameras as a value-add feature for FaceTime.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

• In Q3, the Tablet and 4G Were the Big Stories
• Can Anyone Compete With the iPad?
• Why Apple Hasn’t Sewn Up the Tablet Market — Yet

UPDATED. Flash-based game site Kongregrate found itself excluded from the Android Market today, but it’s still trying to figure out whether its exile is going to be permanent and if so, why it’s being singled out. The gaming site launched the Kongregate Arcade app earlier today, only to have it yanked after Google reportedly said that it violated the non-compete rules in the Android Market terms of service. Essentially, Google seems to be suggesting that Kongregate Arcade is a competing app store.

According to Jim Greer, the CEO of Kongregate — which was recently bought by GameStop — the Arcade may look like an app store, but it’s actually a web browser that connects to the Kongregate site, Greer told VentureBeat. In this way, the app allows users access to hundreds of free games and allows them to cache those games for offline play.

“It does seem like a pretty extreme distortion to call something that plays content in a browser to be the same thing as an application store,” Greer said. “By this definition, we don’t see why apps like the Kindle or other music apps aren’t across the line.”

Greer told Joystiq that he was confused and shocked, and said the decision to call Kongregate Arcade an app store was a “pretty extreme stretch.” Greer said he previously showed the app to people at Google, who were enthusiastic about having it available in Android Market, though he said they weren’t involved in the decision. He’s holding out hope that Google erred in its exclusion of the app, saying it already allows some game emulators that include hundreds of games.

I’ve reached out to Google for comment and hope to hear back soon. It’s possible that this could all be a misunderstanding — although VentureBeat seems to think that Google may be motivated by a desire to make room for its own gaming efforts. If this decision stands, it does strike a blow to Google’s arguments about how open Android is. That’s been a favorite talking point of Google executives in drawing a distinction between Android and iOS. Apple has taken its lumps on numerous occasions for denying apps for a variety of reasons though it has made efforts to be more transparent lately.

Denying Kongregate wouldn’t do any favors to Android’s reputation as a weak gaming platform compared to the iPhone. The platform is slowly getting bigger titles like Angry Birds, but it’s still not a priority for game developers. And while technically the app store competition argument may apply to Kongregate, it raises the question about what Google will do with other apps like Kindle that offer similar services.

Kongregate is still being promoted through GameStop and being sold through GetJar, which is able to sell games direct to Android users. That is still a nice distinction for Android, which allows third-party app stores to sell apps. But until the Kongregate app rejection is sorted out or the rejection proves to be a mistake, it leaves a lot of questions about the role Google is taking in Android Market.

UPDATE: Google responded with a statement standing by its decision to pull the Kongragate Arcade app. “Applications in violation of our policies are removed from Android Market,” Google said. The reasoning comes down to the fact that the Kongregate app, while it acts much like a browser, has the ability to cache games for offline play. That elevates it into a competing software distribution platform offering outside content, something the Android Market terms of service prohibits. It’s likely that a simpler app that listed Kongregate games and launched a traditional browser could get approved. Or if the games were submitted as individual apps, they would also fly. It seems a distinction is being made here between digital content like books or music and mobile apps, which is why Kindle and other services don’t appear to be in danger of being pulled.

Related research from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d):

• Why Google Launched App Inventor
• Is Amazon the New Self-Publish Kingpin?
• Why Carriers Still Hold the Key to Handset Sales

“We are working hard with our U.S. carrier partners to bring meaningful smartphone solutions to market that are compelling consumer experiences, have strong operator support and a thriving ecosystem. As in any business, plans can change and deliberate decisions must be made to enable clear focus on bringing the right products to market at the right time.”

From the sounds of the statement, and given that Nokia hasn’t gained traction here in the U.S. with its Symbian devices, it appears to me that Nokia and AT&T couldn’t agree on the financial details of a carrier deal. Conversations may have ended a February launch, but Nokia appears open to revisiting a deal with AT&T — or perhaps the other big GSM operator, T-Mobile — to get its current high-end smartphones in front of consumers at a price competitive to iPhones and Android handsets.

The situation, if true, also tells me that AT&T is confident enough with its current and planned phone portfolio. Yes, the carrier is losing iPhone exclusivity in a few short weeks, but AT&T has solid Android offerings including the new Motorola Atrix 4G, which can fit in a laptop-like dock or pump 1080p video to a high-definition television set.

I actually had high hopes that Nokia would be able to work with AT&T to carry one of the new Symbian devices announced at Nokia World in September. A developer contest held by Nokia tipped off the possibility of a new Nokia device on AT&T, mainly because AT&T was a key sponsor. Now it looks like that plan has either fallen through or been postponed, at best. And that hurts Nokia because its Symbian devices aren’t subsidized, nor do they receive any marketing attention here in the States. This means most consumers don’t know about them, and when they do find out that Nokia has something to offer, they’re put off by prices of $500 or more.

Based on my prior conversations with key Nokia executives, I suspect this is just another set-back, and not a completely closed door. The U.S. market is extremely important to Nokia, I was told back in June by Niklas Savander, EVP and general manager of the markets unit at Nokia. If AT&T won’t play nice with Nokia, then perhaps the largest handset maker in the world in terms of sales can get T-Mobile to offer subsidized Symbian smartphones.

I think the devices have excellent hardware designs, but are lacking in usability. If Nokia can get a carrier to work with them, it will be up to U.S. consumers to pass their own judgment in a world of iPhones and Androids.

Image courtesy of Eldar Murtazin

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

• Nokia’s Tie-Up With Microsoft Won’t Help
• Mobile OSes Are No Longer Just About Mobile
• It’s Time for Nokia to Embrace Android

Yesterday, Microsoft launched its first Office app for iOS, a mobile version of the digital notebook application OneNote. If you’ve never heard of it, it may be because you’re using the Mac version of Office, which lacks OneNote, greatly reducing the usability of the iOS app.

Microsoft asserts that “78 million PCs in the U.S. have OneNote,” which, while not the same thing as having 78 million users, is still impressive. But the pool of potential overall Microsoft Office users from Mac and PC is more impressive still. Having tried OneNote, I’d suggest it may be the “practice” Office iOS app for Microsoft, before the team attempts to bring in that larger user base through Word, Excel, and PowerPoint apps. But unfortunately that “practice” feel doesn’t help the OneNote succeed as an app in and of itself.

OneNote requires an active Windows Live account to work at all. A Windows Live account allows automatic syncing between OneNote on an iOS device and Windows Live SkyDrive, which then can be synced with OneNote in Office (which, remember, is only available in the Windows version). There are no other way (like email) by which to send notes from an iOS device to a Mac or PC, so cross easy syncing off your list with OneNote.

After logging in once to Windows Live, the admittedly gorgeous OneNote Home screen appears, but looks can be deceiving. On the left, the Home screen shows a list of “notebooks,” which act as directories for your notes. Unfortunately, you can’t create notebooks in OneNote for iOS. You must use OneNote in Office, or use the OneNote web app at windowslive.com. On the left are the contents of the Day-to-Day notebook broken down into sections. Think of sections as those little colored tabs on pages you might divide a physical notebook with. You can’t create or modify these in OneNote for iOS, either.

OneNote does perform well when it comes to actually taking notes, though. While OneNote can be used in landscape mode, you won’t have much screen real estate to keep track of what you’re doing. OneNote works much better, and looks just great, in portrait mode. As seen above, OneNote has options for both bullet lists and checkbox lists, as well as integration with the iPhone camera. The camera option is especially nice, as you can take a picture and have that be the subject of its own note. Apple needs to “borrow” that feature for Notes in iOS 5.

Unfortunately, even note taking in OneNote can at times be frustrating. Wouldn’t it be great if those ring binders on the left of the note indicated a potential action, like turning a page for the next or previous note? Instead, the only way you can get to different notes is by forever going back and forth through lists.

OneNote for iOS is free, for now, but Microsoft makes no promises about the future. If you want to be help encourage Microsoft to develop Office apps for iOS, get it now. If you want a full-featured notes app that really works, there’s Evernote. It’s free, but the premium service at $45 per year significantly increases what the app can do. For Mac users with limited needs, especially those with MobileMe, Apple’s Notes remains the best basic note-taking app. As for OneNote, for now it’s little more than an extension of the Windows application, better for viewing notes than actually creating, organizing, and sharing thoughts.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

• How to Market Your iPhone App: A Developer’s Guide
• Mobile App Developer Survey: Profiles, Platforms and Monetization
• App Developers: Are You Ready for HTML5 and Metered Data?

Smartphone applications specific to cars may best illustrate the promise of mobility and connectivity: intelligent, pocketable devices combined with wireless broadband and smarter cars. While there have been a number of in-vehicle applications for years — think of navigation, point-of-interest searches, real-time traffic data and remote automobile diagnostics — most until now have been constrained for use within the vehicle.

By leveraging the ability for a smartphone to be tied with a car, such apps can move beyond in-car use. And as vehicles gain more processors and sensors, especially in greener cars as noted in a GigaOM Pro report, (subscription required), the possibilities for mobile apps will expand.

So what kinds of mobile apps will connect smartphone-toting drivers with their cars? Ford already launched software specific to its all-electric Ford Focus, allowing users to remotely monitor the battery level and even schedule a recharge during off-peak rate hours. Location Labs, in a partnership with T-Mobile, today launched software that can detect when a driver is behind the wheel of a vehicle and automatically shoot calls direct to voicemail or lock down access to text messaging. Focused on driver safety, the new app appears to monitor vehicle movement through GPS, but in the future, could get that data directly from the car.

But these examples, along with streaming music entertainment from Pandora and smarter navigation solutions, are just the tip of the iceberg. Pairing a connected car with smartphone apps is likely to lead to automatic location check-ins, voice-powered Facebook status updates from the driver’s seat, or even shopping list reminders when you’re about to pass a local retailer that stocks items you’re running out of at home. Whatever the application, mobile broadband and smart handsets combined with the cars of tomorrow could give new meaning to the term “information superhighway.”

For more research on electric cars check out GigaOM Pro (subscription required):

• Car Data As the Next Platform for Innovation
  
• Report: IT Opportunities in Electric Vehicle Management
• Why Microsoft’s Electric Vehicle Deal With Ford Matters

Airfoil for Mac. At the core of this solution is Airfoil 4.0 (free trial, $25 full version). It’s a simple application that would probably do better as a System Preference pane.  The interface is quick to master: Just pick an audio source, and select where you would like that audio source to be heard.  In addition to supporting playback of your iTunes music library, Airfoil will also stream audio content from almost any application on either Mac or PC, including system audio and any attached audio device.  I tested this with the microphone attached to my Apple Cinema Display, as well as a Samson C01U USB Microphone attached to my Mac, and in both cases it worked well.

Airfoil Video Player. One thing you’ll notice right away when playing back video files is that the sound timing is off — way off. This is due to the buffering technology Airfoil uses to keep all audio outputs in sync. You can still play videos on your Mac and listen to them on your external audio system. Included with Airfoil is a custom video player that keeps the soundtrack in sync with the video playback.  It supports web-based content like Netflix, Hulu and YouTube, as well as any most video file formats and DVD playback.

Airfoil to Airplay. Airfoil will transmit to any existing AirPlay device, like the Apple TV and the AirPort Express. It also supports any third-party hardware that uses AirPlay, like Denon’s new AVR-4311CI. You can select either one or many destinations, and Airfoil will ensure that audio playback remains in sync from room to room.

Airfoil Speakers for Mac, Windows and Linux. There are companion apps from Rogue Amoeba that turn any Mac, Windows or Linux machine into a destination that for Airfoil audio. Unfortunately, these apps can’t make any of these platforms AirPlay speakers, so playback only works using Airfoil as the source.

Airfoil Speakers Touch. The icing on the cake is this free App Store offering that enables all iOS devices to also become destinations for Airfoil audio.  Like Speakers for Mac, Windows and Linux, the Touch version doesn’t make iOS devices accessible through AirPlay, but it does allow for remote playback access to your iTunes music library, something you can’t do using Apple’s current AirPlay implementation. Using the Apple Remote app to control iTunes on your computer, and setting Airfoil to broadcast to your iOS device, you can have complete access to your entire iTunes library, bypassing onboard storage limitations.  Airfoil even supports background audio on your iOS device. Unfortunately, you need to be on the same local network as your Mac for this to work.

AirView. This one isn’t part of the Airfoil suite, but it’s worth checking out if you’re interested in the video side of AirPlay. It’s a free app that you can install on any iOS device, where it serves as a receiver for AirPlay video. So, for example, you could play back a video on your iPhone 4 using your iPad. It probably has the most potential as a way to stream your iTunes video library from your Mac to your iPad on a local network quickly and easily, though you’ll need to initiate playback on your Mac before you can control it in the AirView app. The streaming quality is fantastic, though.

Third-party solutions aren’t perfect, but once things are all up and running, everything sounds (and looks) just fine. One of the main hurdles is in initiating playback remotely. Reemote for Airfoil for $2.99 in the App Store provides a workaround for that solution, but an all-in-one solution would obviously be better. In any case, until Apple improves AirPlay itself, these apps are the best bet for fixing the feature’s deficiencies. Any other AirPlay-augmenters you’re using? Let us know in the comments.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

• Five Things Needed for a 48 Million iPad Market
• Report: The Live-Stream Video Market
• Report: The Connected TV Marketplace

Using a Verizon handset for voice and web surfing at the same time hasn’t been possible in the past, because Verizon uses one network for both voice and data. So current CDMA handsets on Verizon must pause their cellular data connection in order to use the network for voice. If the leaked training slide is accurate, Verizon and HTC have come up with a solution for that limitation. While it could be some type of VoIP offering over LTE such as VoLTE (Voice over LTE), I suspect it isn’t, for a few reasons.

The GSMA, the governing body of GSM telecommunications systems, launched a VoLTE initiative only last year. The intent is to create a set of standards for voice communication over LTE networks, which unlike current 3G networks, are completely IP-based. It’s going to take time for those standards to evolve, and I simply don’t see Verizon trying to set the standard for the rest of the world, especially since the operator is just now beginning to adopt GSM technologies.

Adding to that challenge is the lack of LTE network coverage; Verizon’s next-generation network currently covers 38 markets and about one-third of the U.S. population. The carrier expects to cover 140 additional markets by the end of 2011. How would a VoLTE-capable phone handle a voice call when leaving a 4G coverage area? The digital call would have to seamlessly route over to the analog network and that’s simply too complicated. As it is today, available LTE data sticks take time to switch back and forth from 4G to 3G, for example, and any delay would create a poor voice experience.

More likely to me is the idea of managing voice and data through completely separate radios within a handset such as the ThunderBolt. In an LTE coverage area, the data connection would be handled on the faster 4G network and voice would simply be handled as it is today: on the CDMA network. Through software management and multiple radios, this solution seems most likely to me in the short term to provide simultaneous voice and data on Verizon’s network. It’s worth noting that among the new LTE handsets, only the ThunderBolt is using Qualcomm’s new silicon, combining a Snapdragon system-on-a-chip with a Gobi-enabled LTE modem.

We should know soon if indeed the ThunderBolt will handle voice and data at the same time because my sources say that among the four new LTE handsets Verizon will launch in the first half of 2011, the ThunderBolt is the most likely one to launch first. That makes sens,e because aside from Motorola, no other smartphone vendor has partnered as much with Verizon than HTC in the past year or two. The other two LTE handsets expected by June are coming from LG and Samsung, which don’t have as much of a smartphone history with Verizon.

It’s possible that some early standard of VoLTE will appear on the ThunderBolt, but my money is on a multiple radio solution that totally separates voice and data to handle simultaneous use. And if I’m correct, that means you’ll only be able to talk and surf on such devices where you have both 3G and LTE coverage. Consider it a stop-gap measure until a true VoLTE standard evolves, which gives Verizon more time to build out its LTE network.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d):

• Mobile 2011: Data Consumption Will Explode
• In Q3, the Tablet and 4G Were the Big Stories
• For Operators Who Bet on WiMAX, There’s an LTE Plan B

The system, which Starbucks claims is the largest mobile payment program in the country, works through a Starbucks Card Mobile App, available for iPhone and BlackBerry handsets. The app, which is loaded up with a user’s funds via PayPal or a credit card, displays a barcode which the register processes. After a user waves their phone at a Starbucks register for payment, the funds are subtracted from their Starbucks account.

According to the Seattle Times, the mobile payments system builds off Starbucks’ success with reloadable store cards and its push to attract mobile device users. The company said one in five transactions occurs through Starbucks Cards. Users added more than $1.5 billion on the cards last year, a 21 percent increase over 2009.

Starbucks said a third of its U.S. customers use smartphones, mostly iPhones and Blackberry devices. The chain has pushed hard to attract mobile users by making Wi-Fi free and launching a Starbucks Digital Network in stores for customers. By offering connectivity, the company can see which devices are using Wi-Fi, and therefore, which are most popular in its stores, making it easy to target specific platforms with apps. An Android version of the app is reportedly in the works.

Starbucks users can manage their Starbucks Card account from their phone and add funds from existing cards by entering the card numbers into their account. Or they can tie a credit card to their account and request automatic reloads when their balance falls to a certain point. Users can protect their account data with a passcode on the mobile app and can also receive balance protection through their Starbucks Card account if they lose their phone.

The battle for mobile payments has been heating up recently with major players looking at near field communications as a way to process payments. Google has enabled NFC in its latest version of Android while AT&T, Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile USA last year formed Isis, a mobile commerce network that uses NFC. The big hurdle for NFC is that merchants must be convinced to install readers at a couple hundred dollars a pop and use some form of payment standards. But without mass adoption of NFC chips in phones, merchants aren’t in a rush to make the investment.

Starbucks’ system doesn’t work off NFC, but is more of a digital card tied to the phone, a system that works with its existing infrastructure. It has the potential to further lessen people’s reliance on making purchases with cash and credit cards and could help teach people about the benefits of paying with their phone.  If Starbucks was really ambitious, it could look at letting other companies piggyback off its system for a fee, at least until NFC becomes more of an option. Either way, Starbucks is helping forward the debate on mobile payments. We’ll now get to see what the demand is for paying for a latte by phone.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d) about Google and its mobile efforts:

• Why Google Should Fear the Social Web
• Report: Google’s Voice Possibilities.
• How Mobile Cloud Computing Will Change Tech

I’ve used Talkatone on and off throughout the day on my iPod touch, and due to my reliance on Google services, I’ll be using it in lieu of Beejive going forward. I will lose one key advantage, however: Beejive supports multiple chat platforms such as AIM, GTalk and MSN, while Talkatone is strictly tied to Google for chat. There’s also no group chat functionality with Talktatone. But for a Google Voice user, the benefit of one app for IM and voice calls may outweigh these missing features.

Based on the configuration, Talkatone appears to be leveraging the new “Call Phone” Gmail feature that Google added to Google Talk last August. Once I had the app set up, I had my son call my Google Voice number, and my iPod touch immediately began ringing like a phone. One button tap later, I was having a voice conversation from my iPod touch to his iPhone 4, just as if he had called my Nexus One smartphone. The Talktatone folks say they have basic Bluetooth support built-in, but I haven’t tried using a wireless headset with the app just yet. In speakerphone mode, the call quality was acceptable on my iPod; I was also able to use an iPhone headset for a conversation.

The free software does take advantage of Apple’s background task function in iOS4, so Talktatone will pop up notifications as needed for calls or chats. The chat feature isn’t that much different from most others on the market, although Talkatone uses a multiple-window approach to manage conversations and contacts; swiping left or right steps you through the various chats or contact screen. There’s also a button to share your location with any of your Google contacts.

The Talkatone folks don’t recommend using the app over 3G just yet, which could mean they’re still working on efficient voice codecs that work on slower or variable network connections. Voice calls over cellular connections are likely to still be clearer. But I’m fine with that for now; my iPod touch just became much more useful around the house and at hotspots, both for instant messages and voice conversations to and from cellular phones.

Ironically, I did some of my free Talkatone testing with customers on the Verizon network, which just set a $0.0007 cent rate for VoIP calls terminating on their network. I plan to use this app while the service remains free, because although the FCC hasn’t set pricing on VoIP calls, the carriers are starting to take it upon themselves to make business agreements.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

• How Google Voice Could Change Communication
• Report: Google’s Voice Possibilities
• There’s No Such Thing as a Killer Feature for Smartphones

The agreement with Verizon has three implications, with the first being that Bandwidth.com now knows what it will pay to terminate VoIP calls to landlines, which will help it build out a stable cost basis for its business and thus help other VoIP companies it serves do the same. Much like the agreement with the SoundExchange helped Pandora, the online radio station, figure out the costs of providing streaming music to users so it could build out a business model to support itself, this agreement helps Bandwidth.com and other VoIP providers by setting a baseline cost. David Morken, CEO of Bandwidth.com, says he’s in talks with another major wireline provider to sign a similar deal.

The agreement could also help Verizon, which also has a lot of VoIP traffic on its network, pay lower rates to rural telephone companies. Verizon has to pay other telecommunications providers to terminate its VoIP calls, and in some places, it pays almost a half-cent per minute to do so. By publicizing this agreement, Verizon has told the world what it’s charging others, and said what it wants to pay. Expect rural providers to experience pressure from Verizon to bring their VoIP termination fees down to this $0.0007 cent level. From a research note issued today by investment research firm Stifel Nicolaus:

In the absence of reform, we believe Verizon and others are looking to put downward pressure on intercarrier compensation in the marketplace. Verizon is disputing rural carrier collection of access charges for connecting VoIP calls while attempting to negotiate deals, including the one with Bandwidth.com, that move the industry toward lower rates.

The third implication has to do with the somewhat esoteric world of regulation and telecommunications law. The FCC has never ruled on intercarrier compensation rates for VoIP services, because it has never decided if VoIP is a telecommunications service like wireline telephone or an information service like email. Obviously, folks don’t have to pay $0.0007 cents to send an email, although email doesn’t really cross from an IP network to an analog world unless the recipient has dial-up. This private agreement classifies VoIP as an information service and sets a rate — something the FCC hasn’t yet done for VoIP calls. So while the FCC has decades of rate setting and compensation agreements for voice traffic, it has never made the leap to set rates for VoIP. This has left the Verizons and other telcos of the world able to set prices, and the market for VoIP to develop in a way that’s vastly different from the market for email.

So this rather dull-sounding agreement is a big deal for companies like Google, Skype, Twilio and Bandwidth.com, as well as for rural telcos and the FCC. If the FCC decides to make a decision on VoIP interconnection fees rates this year, as some sources have said it will, then Morken says he can let the agreement expire (or not) depending on what the rules say. For Bandwidth.com, which has gone from operating 1 million numbers at the end of 2009 to 17 million numbers today, the agreement is like a hedge against higher prices and regulatory uncertainty that Morken can use to build his business.

With $100 million in annual revenue, up from $85 million the year before, Bandwidth.com is growing well without ever having taken on venture investment. The company, which is profitable, expects to file to go public within the next 18 months, said Morken. We’ve covered the business in December 2009, and I think as an infrastructure provider for VoIP services, Bandwidth.com can sell itself as a credible VoIP platform. Contracts like this only reinforce that legitimacy, although should the FCC declare VoIP an information service, I suppose the contract could become a cost burden other providers wouldn’t have to deal with.

Related GigaOM Pro Content (sub req’d):

• Who Will Profit From Broadband Innovation?
• The New Net-Neutrality Debate: What’s the Best Way to Discriminate?
• When It Comes to Pain at the Pipe, Upstream Is the New Downstream

Enabling More Printers for AirPrint With Printopia

For those user who’ve upgraded to iOS 4.2, Ecamm Network provides an effective and reliable solution with Printopia. For $9.95, Printopia enables AirPrint on any printer your Mac can connect to and works with both Leopard and Snow Leopard (great for those still using PowerPC-based Macs). Not only does it allow printing, but it will also convert files to PDF or JPG for storage on your local Mac or on Dropbox.

Printopia has three key requirements: your iPad must be on the same network as your Mac, you must be running iOS 4.2 or higher, and the application you’re using must support AirPrint. If you don’t meet all those requirements, other options exist and I detail them below.

Pinnacle of Printing: Print Bureau

Eurosmartz has nine different printing apps ranging in price from $2.99 to $12.99. Print Bureau ($12.99) encompasses the features of all each in a single app and can print emails, contacts, calendars, pictures, clipboards and both local and cloud-based files. If it’s on your iPad or accessible via your iPad, Print Bureau should be able to print it. I was able to directly access iDisk, Google Docs, Dropbox, box.net, FTP, and WebDav with the app.

Printing directly from Print Bureau can produce inconsistent results, since it communicates directly with printers. Fortunately, Eurosmartz also offers an alternative method using a companion application called “WePrint.”

WePrint works on Macs running OS X Tiger and above, as well as on XP, Vista, and Windows 7. Instead of having Print Bureau (and any other Eurosmartz apps) print directly to the printer, WePrint intercepts the file and routes it through the desktop’s native printer software, ensuring near-perfect compatibility.

Moreover, WePrint will monitor an email address for you and print any files you send it via the iOS app, thereby enabling printing from outside your local area network. They call it “Printing Over 3G”, but you can be on any type of network to use it.

Other Alternatives

For basic photo printing, a majority of manufacturers have their own printing apps, which are usually free. I’ve tried both HP iPrint Photo 3 and Epson’s iPrint. Both print pictures very well (including screen shots from other iOS apps). Considering these manufacturer-based apps are free, having them all in case you happen to need them is probably a good idea.

Other apps I tested such as Wella’s Print Magic, Avatron’s Air Sharing Pro, and Microtech’s ePrint weren’t always compatible with every printer in every situation. The key advantage of these apps is that they don’t require a “helper” application to be installed on a separate computer. In public environments like a computer lab or hotel, Wella’s ePrint was the most reliable. I was able to walk into a Wi-Fi network and simply print to an available printer. Great for printing a boarding pass at the last minute!

Developers Picking Up Where Apple Left Off

While we’ve come to expect the ability to print from any program on our Mac, it’s sadly still not fully baked in to the iPad, iPhone and iPod touch. Fortunately, programs like Printopia and Print Bureau are helping users bridge the gap between Apple’s printing hype and the iOS reality.

Any other solutions you’ve found that aren’t listed here?

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

• In Q3, E-Books and White Spaces Ruled
• Google’s Chrome OS: Dead Before Arrival?
• How Starbucks Can Become the Barnes & Noble of E-books

The timing of the new mobile group comes hot on the heels of 2010 computer sales figures. The Gartner Group last week estimated 93.4 million personal computers were sold in the last quarter of 2010 and Lenovo accounted for 9.4 million of those. Such numbers boosted Lenovo’s quarterly market share by 21.4 percent compared to the year ago quarter. While personal computers will likely never go away, the future is in smaller mobile devices, as evidenced by sales of smartphones about to surpass those of PCs, if they haven’t already.

Sadly, Lenovo sold off its mobile division in 2008 for $100 million. That was the worst time to do so, as smartphone adoption was just picking up steam. The company realized its error and bought back the division a year later for $200 million. Normally, I’d say that repurchasing an asset for double is a mistake, but $200 million for a mobile business is cheap when you consider Apple is estimated to have earned $14.8 billion in gross profits from iPhone sales.

Lenovo hasn’t provided any specific product details for its new MIDH business group, which will be run by Liu Jun, the former president of Lenovo’s Product Group. The company has shown some innovative mobile products in the past, the most notable being the hybrid slate / laptop U1 shown at the 2010 Consumer Electronics Show (CES). The U1 was making the rounds at this year’s CES as well, with the biggest change coming from software: The custom Linux operating system is gone in favor of the more popular Google Android platform. Lenovo has also embraced Android with its handset portfolio, but focuses on selling the phones in China.

The new focus on mobile is a step in the right direction for Lenovo. If it didn’t make this move, it would risk losing relevancy in the future as consumers flock to more mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. It’s a “better late than never” strategy, so now we have to wait for products to see just how late Lenovo is to the mobile game.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

• 5 Mobile Companies to Watch in 2011
• Nvidia ARMs Itself: Who Has the Most to Lose?
• Why Apple Hasn’t Sewn Up the Tablet Market — Yet