At the end of last year, Infochimps posted a heftier version of its scrape of Twitter, which was taken down at the behest of the micro-messaging site over user privacy concerns. By releasing curated, anonymized chunks of data, the company may avoid most of the user privacy concerns that arose last time around. Then again, it may not.

One of the sets, a “token count,” adds up the number of particular tokens (individual hashtags, smileys and URLs) that have been tweeted since March 2006. The other links the ID strings between Twitter’s Search API and the standard Twitter API. The two APIs issue different ID numbers to users, which makes it annoying, if not impossible, for developers to link data across both services to one user.

Infochimps says it hopes “to send a signal that this data is valuable and useful to real-time search engines, Twitter apps, and social media researchers.” It also hopes to “start a conversation about where value really lies in this type of data, [and] the various ownership and privacy issues that arise.” Given the complaints from Twitter the first time data was posted, it’s a smart move on the part of Infochimps to add this disclosure and thoroughly anonymize the data. The company very much wants to avoid any sort of ill will or backlash from the Twitterati over the release of the data sets. Back in 2006, AOL Research released 20 million search keywords attached to user IDs for researchers to use. A number of individuals were identified as a result of the “anonymized” data, leading to a number of concerns over what sorts of data are kosher to be released.

Ownership and privacy aside, Infochimps is offering the “tokens” data set broken out by month for free, and $9,500 for a version broken out by hour. The “ID/API mapping” data set is being offered for $6,000.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Big Data, ARM and Legal Troubles Transformed Infrastructure in Q4
• Big Data Marketplaces Put a Price on Finding Patterns
• The Near-Term Evolution of Social Commerce

The SIPC helps investors when funds go missing from their accounts — a sort of brokerage version of the FDIC which insures standard checking and savings accounts — and has been in the news most recently regarding efforts to recover funds lost in the Bernie Madoff scandal. Investors who have opened accounts with members of the SIPC are eligible for protection.

One particular problem regarding brokerage accounts is “look-alike” web sites and emails that seem at first glance to be from a legitimate bank, but are actually phishing emails that attempt to trick users into giving up their data. In fact, last month FBI Director Robert Mueller almost fell victim to such a scam, showing that anyone can be tricked. These scams are nothing new either: The SIPC has a press release from 2004 on its web site detailing a request it made to the FBI and SEC to investigate one particular look-alike site for further action.

Of course, ISPs don’t need to be forced to block fraudulent sites — many do it already, to the best of their ability. That’s just good business practice. We noted last month that Comcast was launching a new program called “Constant Guard” to combat botnets, which are a huge threat to networks of all kinds. A few months ago I had the opportunity to speak to Ed Amoroso, AT&T’s chief security officer, who called botnets “as lethal a problem as I’ve ever seen.” Botnets may be nothing new, but there is also much to be done, and there is going to continue to be pressure on ISPs to take more filtering responsibility.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Why iPad 2 Will Lead Consumers Into the Post-PC Era
• The Near-Term Evolution of Social Commerce
• Content Farms: The Players, The Benefits, The Risks

There are many reasons. For starters, it’s increasingly obvious that maps and geo-location are becoming crucial components of any modern operating system. Nokia was the first one to realize this and snapped up companies such as gate5 and Navteq.

Secondly, the acquisition allows Apple to decrease its reliance on former BFF Google. Apple could use Placebase’s technology to replace the Google Maps functionality in the iPhone and iPod touch (and the new tablet, perhaps?) with its an in-house mapping solution. The ongoing legal fight between Apple, Google and the FCC over rejected apps on the iPhone App Store is well-known, as is Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s departure from Apple’s board in August. 

Weintraub claims the Placebase purchase closed in July, which is a curious timeline. Did Schmidt know of Apple’s plans to purchase the company, or was this an instance of him “sitting out” of a board meeting, because it was a place where Apple and Google were possibly competing?

Apple and Google are competing on more and more fronts, and Apple may be looking to cut as many ties with Google as possible in a seemingly belated attempt at keeping the fox out of the henhouse. The highest profile tie at the moment? The Google search box currently sits at the top of every Safari user’s browser window — a search box that likely sends a decently substantial amount of referral funds from Google to Apple. Given Microsoft’s need to expand its search share, it wouldn’t be inconceivable that Apple replaces Google with Bing. As long there is enough “cashback” for Apple!

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• What Google’s Honeycomb Means for Apple and Microsoft
• A 2011 NewNet Forecast
• Mobile Q4: All Eyes Were on Android, 4G and the Rising Tablet Tide

• Speed – From idea to execution, you must move quickly. “If it takes too long to get your product to market, it doesn’t matter if it is great.”
• Relevance to customers – “You say: It’s great!’ But why is it great? ‘Because it’s great!’” That’s not enough. “The customer will ask, ‘What can I do with it?’” He noted that a product might seem great to its inventor, but if it doesn’t create value for the customer, it’s useless. Verwaayen quoted Apple’s Steve Jobs saying, “The most expensive phrase in Silicon Valley is ‘It will work, because it’s really, really cool.’”
• Business model – Every product must have a viable business model. Lots of customers have a mindset of “great product! Thank you, but I’ll take it for free.” He asks, “Why is everything free on the web, but people are willing to pay for a ringtone?” It doesn’t make any sense. We’ve missed that boat as an industry, totally.”

Another questioner asked what was the “most surprising and unanticipated consumer demand” in telecom. Verwaayen said that the industry “missed everything.” “We missed email. We missed SMS. Some people have made a lot of money with ringtones…[Telecom companies] think technology; we don’t think end users.”

Afterwards, I asked him where he looks to see what the next trends in telecom are — to try to discover them before it’s too late. His answer? Whatever 15-year-olds are using.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Why iPad 2 Will Lead Consumers Into the Post-PC Era
• The Near-Term Evolution of Social Commerce
• Content Farms: The Players, The Benefits, The Risks

Narayen said it was “clear customers would like [Adobe] to do a lot more.” Media companies want to understand which rich video content is performing the best, for example, while advertisers and ad agencies that use Flash to produce online ads want to know the click-through rate of those ads in real time. Currently, Omniture integrates with Flash, but with the companies under the same umbrella, Adobe hopes to sell more of Omniture’s products to its existing customer base. One analyst noted during the Q&A that “all Omniture customers are probably Adobe customers, but not the other way around,” leaving a large customer base to which Adobe can push its wares.

Adobe has $2.6 billion in cash and short-term investments; company execs said it’s financing the deal through cash on hand and its existing credit facility.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• A 2011 Green IT Forecast
• Report: A Mobile Video Market Overview
• Report: The Live-Stream Video Market

The Mountain View, Calif.-based startup raised $32 million in three rounds, including a $14 million Series C last month. Mint, which also took home the $50,000 grand prize at the first TechCrunch40 event in 2007, has been gaining users at a prodigious clip, clocking 1.2 million monthly uniques as of August, more than double that of the 482,000 in August 2008, according to Compete.com. Mint allows users to set up links to their personal banking, credit card, investment and mortgage accounts to assist with budgeting and spending, and to gain a picture of their overall financial health — all through a pleasant-looking, easy-to-use site (and iPhone app, natch).

As a result, Mint has a massive cache of data on its users’ spending habits that it would have no trouble selling to third parties. Indeed, a report from earlier this year suggested the company was looking into the possibility, much to the dismay of some commentators who were concerned about privacy. Of course, companies like MasterCard have been aggregating and releasing such data for years.

Mint generates revenue mainly by recommending beneficial financial services to its users, like savings accounts or credit cards with better interest rates, then getting paid by financial service providers for successful sign-ups. Even with the economic implosion, banks are still aggressively looking to acquire new customers — especially those fiscally responsible enough to use an online personal finance site. Since Mint is private, we don’t have details as to its finances or profitability, but given the impressive rate of growth and the sector it’s in, it appears to be in an excellent position to bring in a lot of cash — especially with the deep and trustworthy pockets of Intuit behind them.

Intuit was one of the early movers in online software — I can remember doing my taxes online with TurboTax 10 years ago. On the business side, Intuit has been pushing a developer platform and an online database product called QuickBase. Last year, the company launched an online version of its venerable Quicken consumer-level personal finance software as a direct competitor to Mint.com. Quicken Online doesn’t have the feature set to match its offline sibling, but is more focused on basic financial behavior like budgeting and tracking spending — places where Mint.com is strongest, and has many more users. It’s unclear if Intuit will keep Quicken Online as is, or — more likely, I think — use Mint as its free, entry-level consumer offering and turn Quicken Online into feature-rich port of the more in-depth Quicken desktop application, and price it accordingly.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Report: High-Impact Collaboration in the Enterprise
• Home Energy Management: Innovating Beyond the Browser
• Why iPad 2 Will Lead Consumers Into the Post-PC Era

Television content producers have an ongoing need to find more eyeballs to showcase their wares. Sure, people are still watching television for 13 hours per week, but the amount of time spent online is skyrocketing, especially watching full TV episodes. Hulu had its best month ever in July; TV Everywhere is going to bring massive amounts of video online; Netflix is pushing streaming content hard; and Amazon.com is making its own online video play. And then there’s Apple’s current strategy of selling episodes piecemeal through iTunes.

It’s clear that content makers are open to new ideas. Hulu is doing very well and will be profitable “soon” (if you believe NBC Universal chief Jeff Zucker), even with limited release windows and delays posting content. There’s clearly a strong market for online television. A Hulu subscription model has been bandied about for a while, so the concept of charging users for admission to the fun is certainly not a new one — and consumers are already used to paying for their video content through cable and satellite providers.

A subscription service from Apple consisting of a $35 or so monthly fee for access to a large and complete library of current-season television episodes via iTunes would fit well into the TV networks’ overall content strategy — Hulu has proven there is a demand for streaming full episodes, and the cable companies have long shown that consumers are willing to pay for access. In the past, Apple has succeeded in getting media partners to the negotiating table, bringing all the major movie studios onboard to rent and sell movies through iTunes. Oh yeah, and Apple has a massive pre-built market in the millions of people who own iPhones and iPod touches.

Cable and satellite providers would obviously be livid, and TV Everywhere proponents would feel like the rug was pulled from underneath them — but there’s nothing like a little healthy competition to shake things up, no? So, is Apple building — or should it build — a subscription-based television streaming service, or is it all just a bunch of wishful thinking?

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Why iPad 2 Will Lead Consumers Into the Post-PC Era
• The Near-Term Evolution of Social Commerce
• Content Farms: The Players, The Benefits, The Risks

The iPod Touch is a lightweight, highly portable music and video player, communications and gaming platform and, if rumors are to be believed, its next generation will include a digital camera for stills and video — and maybe even VoIP, all over its Wi-Fi connection. That’s a lot of power from a $229 device. It’s that easy access to the Internet through a Wi-Fi connection that makes the device so interesting. Almost two years ago, long before the iPhone 3G and the App Store made its debut, Apple executives were touting the iPod Touch as the first “mainstream, mobile Wi-Fi platform.” Now, with the 65,000-plus third-party applications on the App Store, the Touch platform has grown significantly since Apple first lauded it in 2008.

The iPhone, of course, is also part of this platform, which is why Apple frequently combines the sales numbers of the two products. At last count, there were 45 million devices capable of running this “Wi-Fi platform” worldwide — also known as the sum of iPod Touch and iPhone sales. By comparison, Sony has sold 58 million PSPs, and Nintendo has sold 108 million of its DS handheld gaming device since 2004 — both gadgets have Wi-Fi, but not nearly the interactivity and multi-functionality that the Touch has. It’s curious that the iPhone gets so much of the coverage, while the iPod Touch gets second shrift. The iPhone can make calls, but with free Wi-Fi networks popping up everywhere thanks to deals with ISPs — plus campus-wide Wi-Fi networks at most colleges across the U.S. — the iPod Touch is fast becoming the WiFi-enabled mobile device to beat. Even Rockstar is releasing an iPod Touch edition of its venerable Grand Theft Auto franchise.

Apple is perpetuating a “virtuous cycle,” as Gene Munster put it in a recent research note, to keep users on the iPod Touch — an improved version of the lock-in provided by the old iTunes/iPod music ecosystem. Users buy the iPod Touch; download apps; developers promote their apps (and the iPod Touch platform), which leads to more consumers buying the iPod Touch. Even better (for Apple), customers can only purchase apps through the company, leading to even more device lock-in.

iPod sales might be dropping, but Apple says half of new purchases of the device are to customers who have never owned one before. I’m willing to bet that many of those customers are interested in Apple’s new Wi-Fi platform. And then, in an even more impressive version of the iPod halo, iPod Touch owners could look to Apple when it’s time to buy their next computer. A virtuous cycle indeed.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Mobile Q4: All Eyes Were on Android, 4G and the Rising Tablet Tide
• Report: A Mobile Video Market Overview
• In Q3, the Tablet and 4G Were the Big Stories

This is only partially true, of course. Books have a long and very rich history that cannot be easily replaced by electronic versions. There are many bibliophiles (including myself) that have shelves full of books that won’t get tossed aside in favor of my Kindle — a gadget which, at the moment, has a malfunctioning screen. That’s a problem I don’t run into with a paperback. There’s nothing quite like going into a bookstore and browsing the shelves looking for your next great read, so the electronic revolution won’t affect books as much as it has music and movies. There’s something romantic about a physical book that just isn’t there with CDs and DVDs — perhaps because the printed book has been around for hundreds of years, and audio and video have gone through a quite a few format changes in their short existence. This also makes books unique in the content realm, in that they are quite difficult to pirate.

Regardless, Nourry has a point. He claims that retailers like Amazon are paying more than $9.99 for each e-book, thus selling them at a loss. He goes on: “That cannot last…Amazon is not in the business of losing money. So, one day, they are going to come to the publishers and say: By the way, we are cutting the price we pay. If that happens, after paying the authors, there will be nothing left for the publishers.” It’s not clear if that is true or not, but we do know that Amazon takes 70 percent of newspaper and blog subscriptions on the Kindle, with only 30 percent going to the content maker. Further, is it really a bad thing if the publisher is left out in the cold? Reading the rejection letters of hit authors makes one wonder what need there is for publishing houses at all, in the age of the Internet.

That’s what Mr. Nourry is so worried about. He is terrified that authors (and Amazon) will realize that they don’t really need his industry to get things done. Don’t worry, Arnaud. Yes, prices might go down and your cut may shrink — but perhaps you should be thankful that people will still be buying books in 10 years. That’s more than can be said for CDs and DVDs.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Mobile Operators’ Strategies for Connected Devices
• Evolution of the E-book Market

• Almost 37 percent of IT budgets were spent on hardware, with 24 percent going to software.
• Desktops remained slightly more popular than notebooks, but not by much. The average SMB plans to buy 13 desktops and 10 laptops in the next year, plus two servers. Companies plan to get 50 months of use — more than four years — from their hardware purchases, up from 40 months last year.
• Backup and recovery (38 percent), antivirus and spam prevention (46 percent) and virtualization software (30 percent) topped the list for software companies’ purchase plans this year.
• 44 percent of SMBs are using virtualization, with companies reporting 21 percent of total computing capacity virtualized.
• 56 percent of SMBs use at least one cloud service, with web hosting (25.4 percent), email (21.2 percent) and online backup (16 percent) being the most popular.

• Despite all the hype regarding hosted or cloud-based solutions, 65 percent of companies surveyed prefer on-site antivirus, and 75 percent use on-site backup. Thirty-five percent use hosted antivirus, and 25 percent subscribe to hosted backup services.

• Only 4.8 percent of total SMB storage allocation is hosted off-site with services like Amazon’s S3, but going forward, companies plan to allocate 6.6 percent of their storage to hosted services.

The economy might be throwing some industries for a loop, but SMBs are still planning to buy — though they expect to get more useful life out of their purchases. However, it doesn’t seem like full-scale cloud technologies like Amazon’s S3 and EC2 have caught on as quickly outside Silicon Valley — the majority of the companies surveyed preferred to keep things in-house rather than trust an outside company. Plus, some companies simply don’t have the computational needs that tech firms have, so cloud computing is simply not as attractive.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• VMware’s Cloudy Ambitions: Can It Repeat Hypervisor Success?
• Web Tablet Survey: Apple’s iPad Hits Right Notes
• Why iPad 2 Will Lead Consumers Into the Post-PC Era

As demand skyrockets, data providers are spending lots of money to install new pipes. SEACOM, a 17,000 km undersea cable linking the southern and eastern regions of Africa to India and Europe with 1.28 Tbps of bandwidth, went live last month. The $650 million project brings a huge increase in connection speed and reliability to the continent, and will serve up data to the millions of Africans buying new phones over the next few years.

And launching today is a new overland cable connecting India and China. The cable, going through the “inhospitable terrain of the Nathula pass,” provides connectivity with much less risk of problems due to natural disasters. Southeast Asia is home to a number of different natural disasters, including earthquakes and typhoons, and undersea cables can be vulnerable to breakage. One thing is certain: Everyone needs fast Internet connections, and the developing world is no different. In the U.S., we’re focusing on the last mile and getting higher-speed Internet to our more rural areas. However, we don’t really have to worry about getting fast data access on a continental scale. Something to reflect on next time you have a dropped call or two.

(Photograph of CS Tyco Reliant, submarine cable laying ship courtesy Tyco Telecom.)

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Why iPad 2 Will Lead Consumers Into the Post-PC Era
• The Near-Term Evolution of Social Commerce
• Content Farms: The Players, The Benefits, The Risks

The Daily Edition splits the difference between Amazon’s regular Kindle and the huge DX model, both in price and size. It has a 7-inch screen vs. the regular Kindle’s 6 inches and the DX’s 9.7 inches. The Sony device lets you rotate to view books in landscape mode as well, which is a nice feature. The Daily also lets people buy books from Sony’s e-book store over the 3G connection, just like the Kindle. So, why didn’t Sony introduce this at the same time as the other ones, earlier this month? The company had no comment on that, but it sure didn’t make much sense at the time. Now, Sony has the broadest selection of e-readers of anyone, and is well-positioned going into the holiday season.

The Sony reader also features integration with local libraries via a partnership with Overdrive, something the booksellers over at Amazon definitely lack. The Library Finder lets you punch in your ZIP code and “check out” books from your local library. Books get automatically “returned” after 21 days. Cool! However, perversely, there aren’t an unlimited number of e-books at each library, because the facility has to pay for each “copy.” Library patrons can’t check out unlimited copies, even though there are no technical limitations. If all the copies of a particular book are checked out, you have to wait for one to get returned before you can give it a read. Two steps forward, one step back.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Evolution of the E-book Market
• A 2011 Connected Consumer Forecast
• Connected Consumer Q4: New Platforms and OTT’s Dynamic Duo Dominated

The linking of population density to download speed is most likely the result of the revenue that can be gleaned by introducing high-speed services in more populated areas, along with the technical limitations of rolling out high-speeds in rural areas where customers may be many miles away from the nearest switching office.

And while the report slams the U.S. for having slower broadband access than other countries — comparing our average 5.1 Mbps download to South Korea’s 20.4 Mbps and Japan’s 15.8 Mbps, for example — such discrepancies can also be attributed to the population density correlation. South Korea has some 1,290 residents per square mile, making the entire country more dense than New Jersey, our most thickly settled state with roughly 1,171 residents per square mile. Japan’s 870 residents per square mile would make it the third densest state, just ahead of Massachusetts. For comparison, the U.S. has a national population density of about 80 residents per square mile. To be sure, South Korea and Japan have strong national broadband strategies that encourage high-speed access for all, but it’s also a lot easier (technically and fiscally) to get high-speed data when you don’t have residents flung across millions of square miles, like we do.

The report, because it comes from a telecom workers union, has its own biases, however. It lumps all broadband users with speeds between 768 kbps and 6 Mbps together, showing most of the country with average speeds in that range. There is a huge difference between the two: 768 Kbps is only enough for email and web browsing while anything above 3Mbps is fast enough to handle almost all online activities, barring large video downloads. Of course, it’s in the union’s best interest to paint a poor picture of broadband in the U.S., as that will help it drum up support for large-scale projects designed to provide high-speed access for all — and provide its members with telecommunications jobs for years to come.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Why iPad 2 Will Lead Consumers Into the Post-PC Era
• 3 Trends Defining the Future of the Digital Home
• The Near-Term Evolution of Social Commerce

However, the “share” aspect of the cameras is concerning. As Stacey questioned in a report on GigaOM Pro (subscription required), how are home broadband connections going to handle the onslaught of uploaded video to sharing and social-networking sites?

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• When It Comes to Pain at the Pipe, Upstream Is the New Downstream
• Why iPad 2 Will Lead Consumers Into the Post-PC Era
• The Near-Term Evolution of Social Commerce

Alaska Airlines is also using Row 44′s in-flight Wi-Fi, which competes with Aircell’s air-to-ground based service, called gogo. Southwest is still working on final pricing and said it will “continue testing price points through the end of 2009.” Currently, it costs between $2 and $12 per flight, depending on the distance of the flight and the type of device used to connect. Presumably this means iPod Touch and MacBook Pro users pay different prices. According to market research firm In-Stat, by 2012, in-flight broadband will be a billion-dollar-a-year business. Southwest operates some 3,200 flights per day on its more than 500 Boeing 737 aircraft.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Report: U.S. Mobile Venture Capital Investment, Q2 2010
• The Smart Energy Home

So while the mystery goes unsolved, a number of “eulogies” and tweets directed at his Twitter stream have been posted in the aftermath of his disappearance, but no real answers. Perhaps his very name, _why, sums it up best: Why did he share his code to begin with, and why did he leave without a trace? The truth may come out eventually, or we may never know. Perhaps ours is not to reason why, but to simply enjoy what is.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Why iPad 2 Will Lead Consumers Into the Post-PC Era
• The Near-Term Evolution of Social Commerce
• Content Farms: The Players, The Benefits, The Risks