<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XCode 3.0, a Great Developer Additon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 01:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 15:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/08/07/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love what Apple has done with XCode but I cannot believe that they are still investing in Objective-C, a rather ugly language with so many convoluted syntax constructs when they had C++! Remove the destructor and add garbage collector, that is all they had to do to accomplish EXACTLY the same thing. Why use C and a list of preprocessor macros using [] and # and - operators when these operators are already used by the C language! Ambiguous + old C?

The next step would be to get rid of the include files like Java. And that would be a rich and elegant OO language to be proud of.

All the terrific interface building capabilities wasted because of Objective-C!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love what Apple has done with XCode but I cannot believe that they are still investing in Objective-C, a rather ugly language with so many convoluted syntax constructs when they had C++! Remove the destructor and add garbage collector, that is all they had to do to accomplish EXACTLY the same thing. Why use C and a list of preprocessor macros using [] and # and &#8211; operators when these operators are already used by the C language! Ambiguous + old C?</p>
<p>The next step would be to get rid of the include files like Java. And that would be a rich and elegant OO language to be proud of.</p>
<p>All the terrific interface building capabilities wasted because of Objective-C!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/08/07/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My buddy got back from WWDC and the first thing we did was take Leopard and Xcode 3.0 for a test drive.  Apple has ADC so developers get &#039;early access&#039; to the OS and developer tools, right?  So if you really want access to Xcode 3 right now, it&#039;s only $500 away, plus you can recoup much of the cost in the hardware discount coupon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My buddy got back from WWDC and the first thing we did was take Leopard and Xcode 3.0 for a test drive.  Apple has ADC so developers get &#8216;early access&#8217; to the OS and developer tools, right?  So if you really want access to Xcode 3 right now, it&#8217;s only $500 away, plus you can recoup much of the cost in the hardware discount coupon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken ken</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 08:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/08/07/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the new xcode include something like a TextMate?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the new xcode include something like a TextMate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/08/07/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just pay 500 dollars for their SELECT dev membership and run leopard now. ib 3.0 is now cleaned up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just pay 500 dollars for their SELECT dev membership and run leopard now. ib 3.0 is now cleaned up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/08/07/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this cool thing gonna have a windows version? if not is there a windows version of somethign like this for people that are stuck wit windowss? :&#039;(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this cool thing gonna have a windows version? if not is there a windows version of somethign like this for people that are stuck wit windowss? :&#8217;(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/08/07/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope it has greater support for Java GUI creation like Cocoa has.

Many will say use this tool or that tool. But im a person that likes to stick with one IDE for all my programming, cocoa, carbon and java.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it has greater support for Java GUI creation like Cocoa has.</p>
<p>Many will say use this tool or that tool. But im a person that likes to stick with one IDE for all my programming, cocoa, carbon and java.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Martinez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Martinez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/08/07/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m extremely excited. I really don&#039;t want to have to wait until Spring of &#039;07 though!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m extremely excited. I really don&#8217;t want to have to wait until Spring of &#8217;07 though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leopard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leopard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/08/07/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[XCode will be available to anyone having access to the betas of Leopard since they&#039;re going to have to be able to make their programs work on Leopard.  But as for the rest of us we&#039;ll have to wait until Leopard is released to get it legally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XCode will be available to anyone having access to the betas of Leopard since they&#8217;re going to have to be able to make their programs work on Leopard.  But as for the rest of us we&#8217;ll have to wait until Leopard is released to get it legally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Alessi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat Alessi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/08/07/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hopefully they will add design capabilities to the Object Modeller.  It&#039;s pretty useless only having a read only view into your object model.  If they added roundtrip modelling, the tool would actually be useful!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully they will add design capabilities to the Object Modeller.  It&#8217;s pretty useless only having a read only view into your object model.  If they added roundtrip modelling, the tool would actually be useful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Fisher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Fisher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 04:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/08/07/xcode-30-a-great-developer-addition/#comment-312677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I agree waiting until next year is disappointing, I don&#039;t see any choice for Apple. Two of the three points you listed are going to &lt;b&gt;require&lt;/b&gt; Leopard; the last (snapshots) could be done without, but I&#039;m sure Apple will leverage new APIs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree waiting until next year is disappointing, I don&#8217;t see any choice for Apple. Two of the three points you listed are going to <b>require</b> Leopard; the last (snapshots) could be done without, but I&#8217;m sure Apple will leverage new APIs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

