Comments on: Words that Leopard’s spellchecker chokes on

By: Isabelle

Isabelle — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:03:18 +0000

Kat, as long as it's not zero or tan90/270 etc you can divide ANY number by ANY OTHER number. Why would can't you divide 37 by 402? Maybe learn something higher than eighth grade math before you try and prove a point.

By: พระเครื่อง

พระเครื่อง — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:46:23 +0000

It’s very useful for me. Thank you. ข่าวพระเครื่อง ตะกรุด มีด เว็บฝากรูป

By: Greyholme

Greyholme — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:28:24 +0000

applicaticataion is my favorite. Even though dictionary.com isn’t certain what it is I would like to define it as a Vaction in the Appalachians

By: Edward Loveall

Edward Loveall — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:20:58 +0000

The typo: nessicarilly

The intended word: necessarily

The suggested spelling: nessiwcarilly

…………what?

By: Ffaelan Condragh

Ffaelan Condragh — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:03:48 +0000

Macs are racist. :)
my boss was writing an email
subject Sanford Biggers
Sanford is a well known African American artist who deals with racial topics and more.
Intended word “Biggers”

I think you can guess what his Mac suggested.
wow. why that word is even in the spell check dictionary I’ll never know.

By: diane frank

diane frank — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:22:18 +0000

Here’s a very QUICK way to find your word by the way it sounds. Nothing like it…ever. Just sound out your word then look it up in the book. You will find the word you really need in 20 seconds or less without having to turn on the computer or go on the internet!! I love this book.

Gabby’s Wordspeller & Phonetic Dictionary
Published 2008 for the world and International Lions Club
ISBN 978-0-9801025-0-5

By: kat

kat — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:10:52 +0000

anyone else noticed that the 10.5 calculator is a horror show? just for example, divide 37 by 402. what is this – new math?? (but my widget calculator seems OK.)

By: Partners in Grime

Partners in Grime — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:15:59 +0000

Intended: Ballmer
Suggested: Baller

See? Apple’s got a great sense of humor! :)

By: Chris Huang

Chris Huang — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:58:47 +0000

Send this to Apple and hopefully they’ll fix it in the next Leopard update.

By: Nick Mediati

Nick Mediati — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:46:27 +0000

@ #10: see #9.

And why would I have the spellchecker remember misspellings?

By: Ben

Ben — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 05:15:41 +0000

I work for a large magazine and our subs (with the help of spellcheck) changed all refernces to Malware in an article to Malaria.

Lucky we picked it up before it went to print.

By: Dont

Dont — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:16:16 +0000

type “dont” and it dont suggest don’t

By: KiL

KiL — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:00:29 +0000

I guess he must have had the spellchecker learn some of his own misspellings previously. Here “instrucitons” proposes to spell it “instructions”
“applicatication” comes up with no suggestions for correction (but it’s marked as misspelled)
“positiove” proposes to spell it “positive”

By: Nick Mediati

Nick Mediati — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:10:32 +0000

I got the so-called correction for “Inc.” but “Hell” was recognized as being correct. Bizarre.

And fwiw, I tested this using a fresh user account too. Since each user has their own custom spelling dictionary, it shouldn’t carry over even if “positionve” was in my custom dictionary (which it wasn’t).

By: appleforapple.com » Mac 101: spell check errors

appleforapple.com » Mac 101: spell check errors — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:09:32 +0000

[...] a funny post at The Apple Blog today that points out a few typos that give Mac OS X Leopard’s built-in spell checker a bit [...]

By: Rich

Rich — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:54:28 +0000

I get the same problems as Nick. I tested it in text edit. ‘lol’ should be marked as misspelled, but the suggestion loll makes no sense (I get that suggestion also.) Though, I do not get the same results that Jon and Gorm got. Hell and Inc. are not shown as misspelled on my computer.