<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows a Battery Hog Compared With OS X, At Least on Apple Computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 12:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Laptop News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News: &#8220;Windows a Battery Hog Compared With OS X, At Least on Apple Computers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/#comment-348769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mac Laptop News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News: &#8220;Windows a Battery Hog Compared With OS X, At Least on Apple Computers&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26314#comment-348769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Windows a Battery Hog Compared With OS X, At Least on Apple Computers on TheAppleBlogTopics: MacBook Pro, MacBook, Mac OS X [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows a Battery Hog Compared With OS X, At Least on Apple Computers on TheAppleBlogTopics: MacBook Pro, MacBook, Mac OS X [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/#comment-348768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hugo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26314#comment-348768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Windows ran virtualized in parallels or fusion, OS X would still be managing the power system for the laptop so it shouldn&#039;t be different from OS X without Parallels or Fusion running.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Windows ran virtualized in parallels or fusion, OS X would still be managing the power system for the laptop so it shouldn&#8217;t be different from OS X without Parallels or Fusion running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dempsey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/#comment-348767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Dempsey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26314#comment-348767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terry - Mac OS X is constantly doing background process that eat up cpu and disk I/O which is hard on battery life as well. I don&#039;t care for Windows, but let&#039;s not make it sound like OS X is completely innocent here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry &#8211; Mac OS X is constantly doing background process that eat up cpu and disk I/O which is hard on battery life as well. I don&#8217;t care for Windows, but let&#8217;s not make it sound like OS X is completely innocent here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/#comment-348766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26314#comment-348766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vista is constantly doing background processes that eat up cpu and disk I/0 which is hard on battery life.  Its a crappy OS built on top of years of other crappy versions of Windows.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista is constantly doing background processes that eat up cpu and disk I/0 which is hard on battery life.  Its a crappy OS built on top of years of other crappy versions of Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/#comment-348765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrei]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26314#comment-348765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article tested the new low-spec $1699 MBP 15&quot; that doesn&#039;t have a 9600M GT, only the 9400M, so the graphic card isn&#039;t the issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article tested the new low-spec $1699 MBP 15&#8243; that doesn&#8217;t have a 9600M GT, only the 9400M, so the graphic card isn&#8217;t the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamjackson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/#comment-348764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adamjackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26314#comment-348764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with Brad on this. I&#039;ve been running Vista on my Mac part time through Boot Camp and 9600 was always on and thus lead to a 1.5 hour battery life compared to 3.5 with the Mac on 9400 card.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Brad on this. I&#8217;ve been running Vista on my Mac part time through Boot Camp and 9600 was always on and thus lead to a 1.5 hour battery life compared to 3.5 with the Mac on 9400 card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/#comment-348763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26314#comment-348763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I have an early-2008 MacBook Pro, and I love it.  Why can&#039;t someone (even Apple!) create a new LiPolymer battery for it?  Mine&#039;s replaceable!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I have an early-2008 MacBook Pro, and I love it.  Why can&#8217;t someone (even Apple!) create a new LiPolymer battery for it?  Mine&#8217;s replaceable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeSweeet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/#comment-348762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BeSweeet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26314#comment-348762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Battery life on my hackintosh is less than what I get in Vista. Running Vista SP2 x64 &amp; OS X 10.5.7. I never really get good battery life on my laptop anyway. I&#039;m running a Intel C2D @ 2GHz, 250GB HDD, 4GB RAM, Intel X3100 GPU. All hardware is fully functional.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Battery life on my hackintosh is less than what I get in Vista. Running Vista SP2 x64 &amp; OS X 10.5.7. I never really get good battery life on my laptop anyway. I&#8217;m running a Intel C2D @ 2GHz, 250GB HDD, 4GB RAM, Intel X3100 GPU. All hardware is fully functional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joecab</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/#comment-348761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joecab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26314#comment-348761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But that&#039;s with Boot Camp only, right? If you ran it virtually via Parallels or Fusion, would that improve things?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that&#8217;s with Boot Camp only, right? If you ran it virtually via Parallels or Fusion, would that improve things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Dougherty</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/windows-a-battery-hog-compared-to-os-x-at-least-on-apple-computers/#comment-348760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Dougherty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26314#comment-348760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows uses the 9600M GT all the time, so I&#039;m sure that doesn&#039;t help with battery life. It would have been closer if they switched to that in OS X.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows uses the 9600M GT all the time, so I&#8217;m sure that doesn&#8217;t help with battery life. It would have been closer if they switched to that in OS X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

