<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why So Hard on the Keynote?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZFS Not Out, Not In Either - The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ZFS Not Out, Not In Either - The Apple Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/11/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] been defending the Keynote and somewhat lackluster features in the past couple posts, but I think I&#8217;m about to surrender [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been defending the Keynote and somewhat lackluster features in the past couple posts, but I think I&#8217;m about to surrender [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious George</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curious George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/11/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am curious about the &quot;Inspect Item&quot; feature: I can&#039;t seem to find any &quot;items&quot; to &quot;inspect.&quot; What sorts of things qualify as &quot;items&quot;? Nothing on this page seems to be an &quot;item&quot; when I right-click on it.

I&#039;m curious what a bunch of Cocoa developers thought of a buggy Windows browser being released at their own conference? The argument that they shouldn&#039;t be announcing hardware at WWDC isn&#039;t helped by Apple&#039;s release of Safari for Windows users. I&#039;m curious about that.

I&#039;m curious about how those same developers feel knowing that resources were supposedly taken away from 10.5&#039;s development to create the iPhone, but they magically had plenty of resources to develop a Safari for Windows in that same time. Very curious.

I&#039;m also curious what those same cocoa developers think about being told that they can&#039;t have any part in writing software for the iPhone—unless of course they want to use Ajax. Whooptie do! I can make a shopping list for the grocery store! What? You mean my grocery store doesn&#039;t have free wi-fi? I have to be connected to the &#039;net all the time? The data plan costs how much? Where did I put my pen and paper again?

I&#039;m also very curious about the complete lack of an update mentioned for metadata. Tiger&#039;s metadata implementation is fine if you never want to ADD metadata to a file...But guess what? I do want to use metadata proactively. I want to tag all of my project files with project metadata so I can set up a smart folder and only have 1 copy (plus a backup of course) of a huge .PSD file that&#039;s linked to 20-30 different projects. Stinkin&#039; Windows Vista can do this. But I&#039;m not a Windows user for a reason. Why is Apple dropping this ball? Oh, so curious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious about the &#8220;Inspect Item&#8221; feature: I can&#8217;t seem to find any &#8220;items&#8221; to &#8220;inspect.&#8221; What sorts of things qualify as &#8220;items&#8221;? Nothing on this page seems to be an &#8220;item&#8221; when I right-click on it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious what a bunch of Cocoa developers thought of a buggy Windows browser being released at their own conference? The argument that they shouldn&#8217;t be announcing hardware at WWDC isn&#8217;t helped by Apple&#8217;s release of Safari for Windows users. I&#8217;m curious about that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious about how those same developers feel knowing that resources were supposedly taken away from 10.5&#8242;s development to create the iPhone, but they magically had plenty of resources to develop a Safari for Windows in that same time. Very curious.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also curious what those same cocoa developers think about being told that they can&#8217;t have any part in writing software for the iPhone—unless of course they want to use Ajax. Whooptie do! I can make a shopping list for the grocery store! What? You mean my grocery store doesn&#8217;t have free wi-fi? I have to be connected to the &#8216;net all the time? The data plan costs how much? Where did I put my pen and paper again?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also very curious about the complete lack of an update mentioned for metadata. Tiger&#8217;s metadata implementation is fine if you never want to ADD metadata to a file&#8230;But guess what? I do want to use metadata proactively. I want to tag all of my project files with project metadata so I can set up a smart folder and only have 1 copy (plus a backup of course) of a huge .PSD file that&#8217;s linked to 20-30 different projects. Stinkin&#8217; Windows Vista can do this. But I&#8217;m not a Windows user for a reason. Why is Apple dropping this ball? Oh, so curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/11/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amber, Really, your going to buy an iPhone and only use it as a phone? Do you have a ton of disposable cash laying around? If so, I&#039;ll be happy to help you &quot;dispose&quot; of it. :)

Seriously, if you are only going to use the phone part of the iPhone, there are a lot of other phones out there that are a lot cheaper and work really well as a phone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amber, Really, your going to buy an iPhone and only use it as a phone? Do you have a ton of disposable cash laying around? If so, I&#8217;ll be happy to help you &#8220;dispose&#8221; of it. :)</p>
<p>Seriously, if you are only going to use the phone part of the iPhone, there are a lot of other phones out there that are a lot cheaper and work really well as a phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber Yount</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amber Yount]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/11/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought the keynote was good as usual, and I&#039;ll be first in line for both Leopard and the iphone...but honestly...most of the stuff in leopard really is just eye candy....at least for me, i have no problem finding stuff in finder, and i hardly ever use spotlight, it makes me wonder if i&#039;ll really ever use stacks....evenmore so with spaces...i don&#039;t think i&#039;ll use that at all. (Guess I&#039;ll just have to see if it really is better) Same thingn with the iPhone....although it will probably replace the laptop at school for browsing the internet, i&#039;m not sure if i&#039;ll ever use it beyound that (except for the phone part) I hardly use my ipod anymore.  And I barely use the aTV sincxe i bought it (although i suspect if they start renting movies ill be using it alot more) Anyways point being, all of Apple&#039;s stuff is absolutely neat.....but a lot of it is just sitting around my house as eye candy :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the keynote was good as usual, and I&#8217;ll be first in line for both Leopard and the iphone&#8230;but honestly&#8230;most of the stuff in leopard really is just eye candy&#8230;.at least for me, i have no problem finding stuff in finder, and i hardly ever use spotlight, it makes me wonder if i&#8217;ll really ever use stacks&#8230;.evenmore so with spaces&#8230;i don&#8217;t think i&#8217;ll use that at all. (Guess I&#8217;ll just have to see if it really is better) Same thingn with the iPhone&#8230;.although it will probably replace the laptop at school for browsing the internet, i&#8217;m not sure if i&#8217;ll ever use it beyound that (except for the phone part) I hardly use my ipod anymore.  And I barely use the aTV sincxe i bought it (although i suspect if they start renting movies ill be using it alot more) Anyways point being, all of Apple&#8217;s stuff is absolutely neat&#8230;..but a lot of it is just sitting around my house as eye candy :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanni</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vanni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/11/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not a developer... i can&#039;t even spell it.  But I am a user and what i saw has not jazzed me up one iota. I _need_ a better .Mac expereince; a better Safari that, for one, WARNS me when i Quit  by mistake with four tabs open and I get no warning a la FF; a better FUNCTIONAL finder .. the eye-candy is somewhat ncie, but....  I sure hpe Leopard has a lot moe in it when it is announced im Oct bwecasue wha ti saw yesterday is not going to make me want to upgrade.

PS @Mrad: re &quot;just control click/right click on an element in a page and select “inspect element”. You’ll see what I mean&quot; I see no opion / menu item to &quot;inspect element&quot; ... can you please explain what you mean?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a developer&#8230; i can&#8217;t even spell it.  But I am a user and what i saw has not jazzed me up one iota. I _need_ a better .Mac expereince; a better Safari that, for one, WARNS me when i Quit  by mistake with four tabs open and I get no warning a la FF; a better FUNCTIONAL finder .. the eye-candy is somewhat ncie, but&#8230;.  I sure hpe Leopard has a lot moe in it when it is announced im Oct bwecasue wha ti saw yesterday is not going to make me want to upgrade.</p>
<p>PS @Mrad: re &#8220;just control click/right click on an element in a page and select “inspect element”. You’ll see what I mean&#8221; I see no opion / menu item to &#8220;inspect element&#8221; &#8230; can you please explain what you mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/11/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the .Mac thing... Just wait a few more months. I suspect that when iLife is released, we will see some changes with .Mac.

I think they are moving in the right direction for .Mac. I&#039;m still not interested yet, but if they do some more stuff with it when iLife &#039;07 comes out, then I might just be interested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the .Mac thing&#8230; Just wait a few more months. I suspect that when iLife is released, we will see some changes with .Mac.</p>
<p>I think they are moving in the right direction for .Mac. I&#8217;m still not interested yet, but if they do some more stuff with it when iLife &#8217;07 comes out, then I might just be interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Jones</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/11/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article is trying to make the point that all the announcements were developer related because this is a DEVELOPER conference.  Point taken.  But, what does Safari running on windows have to do with software development, let alone Macintosh development?

And yes, a full year ago Jobs told us that they were holding back several Leopard features that were top secret.  Yesterday he took what should have been one bullet point, and stretched it out to 3 (Desktop, Finder, QuickView).  And that is where the so called top secret features ended.

The disappointment has a lot to do with Jobs setting the expectation much higher than he delivered.  I agree that something must have changed, and some 10.5 features must have been pushed back to 10.6.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article is trying to make the point that all the announcements were developer related because this is a DEVELOPER conference.  Point taken.  But, what does Safari running on windows have to do with software development, let alone Macintosh development?</p>
<p>And yes, a full year ago Jobs told us that they were holding back several Leopard features that were top secret.  Yesterday he took what should have been one bullet point, and stretched it out to 3 (Desktop, Finder, QuickView).  And that is where the so called top secret features ended.</p>
<p>The disappointment has a lot to do with Jobs setting the expectation much higher than he delivered.  I agree that something must have changed, and some 10.5 features must have been pushed back to 10.6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/11/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I like the idea of Safari on Windows, I have to say that I&#039;m a shade irked that I now have a fourth browser (along with IE, FF, Opera, of course) to test against in Windows. Of course, at least now the two sides are even. Symmetry is always nice. But the new stuff it Safari 3 rocks - just control click/right click on an element in a page and select &quot;inspect element&quot;. You&#039;ll see what I mean. Resizable text areas are pimp too.

But overall I was a bit let down with the keynote - I wasn&#039;t really expecting new hardware, but I was wanting to see a bit more of Leopard. But I&#039;m friggin&#039; foaming at the mouf for an iPhone!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I like the idea of Safari on Windows, I have to say that I&#8217;m a shade irked that I now have a fourth browser (along with IE, FF, Opera, of course) to test against in Windows. Of course, at least now the two sides are even. Symmetry is always nice. But the new stuff it Safari 3 rocks &#8211; just control click/right click on an element in a page and select &#8220;inspect element&#8221;. You&#8217;ll see what I mean. Resizable text areas are pimp too.</p>
<p>But overall I was a bit let down with the keynote &#8211; I wasn&#8217;t really expecting new hardware, but I was wanting to see a bit more of Leopard. But I&#8217;m friggin&#8217; foaming at the mouf for an iPhone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/11/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Windows XP user, longing to switch over to a Mac at some time, I am quite underwhelmed by nearly everything I see in the Safari Beta.  Yes the speed is great, but the list of things that make it crash seem endless including simple things like trying to add bookmarks.  Also, having to go to the File to add a new Tab seems so archaic, when Opera and Explorer 7 makes it so easy.  Also, it doesn&#039;t remember things like my zip code when I re-visit the Accuweather page, nor does it pull up the security picture for Yahoo Mail that both Opera and Explorer pull up.  I&#039;ll keep playing with it, figuring that, like any new software there is a steep learning curve.

To really wow me, how about making iLife cross platforms?  That would be really amazing for us non-mac users who dream of getting a Mac soon, or at least Mac functionality.

Right now, on first look, I had wanted to play with it, to help with my transition-to-Mac jitters.  All this has done is to say, ah just another web browser, with other web browsers that I am already using having more features and a lot more flexibility.

For the Apple Software developers, welcome to competition!  You are now on Windows, and if you are here to stay, you have to compete with a handful really creative, independant developers.

R]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Windows XP user, longing to switch over to a Mac at some time, I am quite underwhelmed by nearly everything I see in the Safari Beta.  Yes the speed is great, but the list of things that make it crash seem endless including simple things like trying to add bookmarks.  Also, having to go to the File to add a new Tab seems so archaic, when Opera and Explorer 7 makes it so easy.  Also, it doesn&#8217;t remember things like my zip code when I re-visit the Accuweather page, nor does it pull up the security picture for Yahoo Mail that both Opera and Explorer pull up.  I&#8217;ll keep playing with it, figuring that, like any new software there is a steep learning curve.</p>
<p>To really wow me, how about making iLife cross platforms?  That would be really amazing for us non-mac users who dream of getting a Mac soon, or at least Mac functionality.</p>
<p>Right now, on first look, I had wanted to play with it, to help with my transition-to-Mac jitters.  All this has done is to say, ah just another web browser, with other web browsers that I am already using having more features and a lot more flexibility.</p>
<p>For the Apple Software developers, welcome to competition!  You are now on Windows, and if you are here to stay, you have to compete with a handful really creative, independant developers.</p>
<p>R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/11/why-so-hard-on-the-keynote/#comment-321354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No .Mac overhaul :-(
No iWork update info :-(
No iLife update info :-(
No updated ACDs :-(
No iPhone SDK :-(

Leopardy goodness :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No .Mac overhaul :-(<br />
No iWork update info :-(<br />
No iLife update info :-(<br />
No updated ACDs :-(<br />
No iPhone SDK :-(</p>
<p>Leopardy goodness :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

