<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do software companies support the Mac?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; construction loans 22688</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Blog Archive &#187; construction loans 22688]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/09/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8230; provided at a cost, referred to as interest on the debt. A borrower may be subject to certain restrictions known as loan covenants under the terms of loan Loan&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8230; provided at a cost, referred to as interest on the debt. A borrower may be subject to certain restrictions known as loan covenants under the terms of loan Loan&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot links &#187; Blog Archive &#187; new fishing info 374</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hot links &#187; Blog Archive &#187; new fishing info 374]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 08:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/09/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I found this great article. You can read rest of it here : here [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I found this great article. You can read rest of it here : here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot links &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fishing 374</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hot links &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fishing 374]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 08:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/09/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I found this great article. You can read rest of it here : here [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I found this great article. You can read rest of it here : here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaleel King</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaleel King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 15:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/09/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I really want to know is why develop for a platform that could potentially be and very much is your direct competition?

Apple has developed it&#039;s version of different software types to go against other packages on its system which snuffs out 3rd party developers from trying to make anything else. This also makes it difficult to find the software at times as well, ie: Media Players, Compression, ect for those not familiar with OS X vs what you can find for Windows.

What would Adobe do if Apple came out with a Photoshop like app? Apple did something like this when it did the iApplications, there are very few low cost options or innovations coming from someone other than Apple. Once iMovie, then Final Cut Express, and Final Cut came out it virtually killed off the competition on the Mac for NLE&#039;s (Non-Linear Editor. Now their challenging After Effects with Motion which has recently add 3D to it.

I&#039;m looking almost like it from the perspective of Blu-ray and Sony one of its major backers. Why would other studios essentially support the competition&#039;s format when they&#039;ll be paying their competition to further compete against them content wise.

Competition is always a good thing though but in the case of Apple they control nearly everything from the hardware to the software and everything in between.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I really want to know is why develop for a platform that could potentially be and very much is your direct competition?</p>
<p>Apple has developed it&#8217;s version of different software types to go against other packages on its system which snuffs out 3rd party developers from trying to make anything else. This also makes it difficult to find the software at times as well, ie: Media Players, Compression, ect for those not familiar with OS X vs what you can find for Windows.</p>
<p>What would Adobe do if Apple came out with a Photoshop like app? Apple did something like this when it did the iApplications, there are very few low cost options or innovations coming from someone other than Apple. Once iMovie, then Final Cut Express, and Final Cut came out it virtually killed off the competition on the Mac for NLE&#8217;s (Non-Linear Editor. Now their challenging After Effects with Motion which has recently add 3D to it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking almost like it from the perspective of Blu-ray and Sony one of its major backers. Why would other studios essentially support the competition&#8217;s format when they&#8217;ll be paying their competition to further compete against them content wise.</p>
<p>Competition is always a good thing though but in the case of Apple they control nearly everything from the hardware to the software and everything in between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why do software companies support OS X? - SlingMedia at The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why do software companies support OS X? - SlingMedia at The Apple Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/09/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] with my &#8220;Why Software Companies Support OS X&#8221; series, I had a chance to ask some questions to Brian Jacquet, a spokesperson for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with my &#8220;Why Software Companies Support OS X&#8221; series, I had a chance to ask some questions to Brian Jacquet, a spokesperson for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 14:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/09/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Mac only software development company, I can tell you of yet another reason the Mac is more attractive: support and development costs.

It is way cheaper to support the Mac than it is to support Windows. The variations of the OS + the variation of the hardware make it very expensive and time consuming. The same logic applies to development. Variations aside, I can tell you that developing an app like Daylite or Billings (http://www.marketcircle.com), would take longer. The tool on the Windows side are improving, but I think Cocoa still has an edge - and that makes a difference.

So while the &quot;market share&quot; may be smaller - it is also less costly to operate on the Mac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Mac only software development company, I can tell you of yet another reason the Mac is more attractive: support and development costs.</p>
<p>It is way cheaper to support the Mac than it is to support Windows. The variations of the OS + the variation of the hardware make it very expensive and time consuming. The same logic applies to development. Variations aside, I can tell you that developing an app like Daylite or Billings (<a href="http://www.marketcircle.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketcircle.com</a>), would take longer. The tool on the Windows side are improving, but I think Cocoa still has an edge &#8211; and that makes a difference.</p>
<p>So while the &#8220;market share&#8221; may be smaller &#8211; it is also less costly to operate on the Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Pilkington</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Pilkington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/09/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the main reason to develop for the Mac is that while it is only 6% of the market, it&#039;s the good 6% of the market. Mac users have money and they want to buy software. One great example of this is MS Office. Office for Mac is actually one of Microsoft&#039;s most profitable lines.

The Mac is also far more friendly for smaller developers like myself than Windows. Much of the emphasis on the Mac is selling software online, which allows for far more smaller developers to make it big.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the main reason to develop for the Mac is that while it is only 6% of the market, it&#8217;s the good 6% of the market. Mac users have money and they want to buy software. One great example of this is MS Office. Office for Mac is actually one of Microsoft&#8217;s most profitable lines.</p>
<p>The Mac is also far more friendly for smaller developers like myself than Windows. Much of the emphasis on the Mac is selling software online, which allows for far more smaller developers to make it big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Coventry&#8217;s blog &#187; Why Fastforward is Mac-only</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Coventry&#8217;s blog &#187; Why Fastforward is Mac-only]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/09/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This article from theappleblog caught my attention and has prompted me to write briefly about why Fastforward only develops and publishes Mac software. Firstly, I&#8217;ve always been a Mac user, and as the guy who started this company, it&#8217;d be strange for me to suddenly start developing and selling Windows software. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This article from theappleblog caught my attention and has prompted me to write briefly about why Fastforward only develops and publishes Mac software. Firstly, I&#8217;ve always been a Mac user, and as the guy who started this company, it&#8217;d be strange for me to suddenly start developing and selling Windows software. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/09/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll tell you why we (a small start-up) are creating software for and supporting the Mac.  My company Devicescape Software recently ported and released a version of our auto wi-fi connecting software for the Mac OSX - and we didn&#039;t do it for the money.  (We give the software and service away for free, so its not about money for us at this point ;-)

While the Mac community represents only a small percentage of overall computers installed in the market, it also represents a huge number of people in several markets we are targeting:  creatives, designers, press people - and yes - students!  We give away our software and service, but reaching these creative markets is an essential strategy for our budding company.  In his article on ubiquitous computing, Mark Heiser says (I&#039;m paraphrasing) that the when technologies &quot;disappear&quot; people can clearly see goals beyond the technologies themselves and create something new.  The Mac users are already freer to pursue creative endeavors and other goals.  These are the same people who may have the vision for the next &quot;killer app&quot; in the budding Mobile 2.0 market.  I want my software running in these creative circles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll tell you why we (a small start-up) are creating software for and supporting the Mac.  My company Devicescape Software recently ported and released a version of our auto wi-fi connecting software for the Mac OSX &#8211; and we didn&#8217;t do it for the money.  (We give the software and service away for free, so its not about money for us at this point ;-)</p>
<p>While the Mac community represents only a small percentage of overall computers installed in the market, it also represents a huge number of people in several markets we are targeting:  creatives, designers, press people &#8211; and yes &#8211; students!  We give away our software and service, but reaching these creative markets is an essential strategy for our budding company.  In his article on ubiquitous computing, Mark Heiser says (I&#8217;m paraphrasing) that the when technologies &#8220;disappear&#8221; people can clearly see goals beyond the technologies themselves and create something new.  The Mac users are already freer to pursue creative endeavors and other goals.  These are the same people who may have the vision for the next &#8220;killer app&#8221; in the budding Mobile 2.0 market.  I want my software running in these creative circles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/09/why-do-software-companies-support-the-mac/#comment-319784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It goes without saying Adobe makes money off of Mac People, but in addition to that.. there are two types of fans: Those who tell you they &quot;like you&quot; and Those who can tell you &quot;WHY they like you.&quot; I&#039;ve been to numerous Adobe Seminars and the Windows Folk can barely construt a question, it&#039;s almost a relief for Adobe Staff Personnel to field a question by someone who really knows and really cares (Mac Folk.) You just watch and feel sorry for the lecturer as they work with confused, yet barely awake, El Lame-o windoze types. It&#039;s more fun to develop for people who really appreciate your work. Hopefully, Mac can get back it&#039;s market share. Steve lost it with his elitist- &quot;Only for the Rich&quot; attitude, now he needs to go back and get it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It goes without saying Adobe makes money off of Mac People, but in addition to that.. there are two types of fans: Those who tell you they &#8220;like you&#8221; and Those who can tell you &#8220;WHY they like you.&#8221; I&#8217;ve been to numerous Adobe Seminars and the Windows Folk can barely construt a question, it&#8217;s almost a relief for Adobe Staff Personnel to field a question by someone who really knows and really cares (Mac Folk.) You just watch and feel sorry for the lecturer as they work with confused, yet barely awake, El Lame-o windoze types. It&#8217;s more fun to develop for people who really appreciate your work. Hopefully, Mac can get back it&#8217;s market share. Steve lost it with his elitist- &#8220;Only for the Rich&#8221; attitude, now he needs to go back and get it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

