<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shuffle&#8217;s Hardware DRM Not DRM at All&#8230;Or is It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/shuffles-hardware-drm-not-drm-at-allor-is-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/shuffles-hardware-drm-not-drm-at-allor-is-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Repair New Orleans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/shuffles-hardware-drm-not-drm-at-allor-is-it/#comment-342297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Repair New Orleans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19695#comment-342297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only headphones, but it had made all accessories and peripherals obsolete, because you cannot plug it into an aux input.

For instance, you can&#039;t connect a 1/8th&quot; stereo cable from your car stereo to your Shuffle. You&#039;d need a special cable that doesn&#039;t even exist yet. 

I forecast a boom in eBay sales of 2nd Gen iPod shuffles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only headphones, but it had made all accessories and peripherals obsolete, because you cannot plug it into an aux input.</p>
<p>For instance, you can&#8217;t connect a 1/8th&#8221; stereo cable from your car stereo to your Shuffle. You&#8217;d need a special cable that doesn&#8217;t even exist yet. </p>
<p>I forecast a boom in eBay sales of 2nd Gen iPod shuffles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/shuffles-hardware-drm-not-drm-at-allor-is-it/#comment-342296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19695#comment-342296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#039;s all about control. Apple wants their product to exist with its halo intact after a year of use by real people. In order to do that, they&#039;ve set up the program to license the necessary electronics to people who - in return for boasting &quot;Made for iPod&quot; - are prepared to conform to Apple&#039;s quality standards.

People who don&#039;t want to adhere to Apple&#039;s standards are free to manufacture compatible hardware, but they won&#039;t be able to use the &quot;Made for iPod&quot; trademark.

I&#039;m an Apple user. The reason I use Apple products is that they&#039;re generally made to a higher quality standard than the rest of the market, and Apple pays a lot of attention to UI and basic looks.

I don&#039;t want my Apple experience cheapened by some third-rate company manufacturing junk headphones passing them off as &quot;Made for iPod&quot; thankyouverymuch.

Can people just get over the initial hysteria and realise that Apple &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; about control, but in this case it&#039;s not the market that they&#039;re trying to control, it&#039;s the halo around their products that they&#039;re trying to control.

I&#039;m a control freak and a snob, and I appreciate the efforts Apple goes to in order to ensure that my Apple &quot;experience&quot; is as pleasant as possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s all about control. Apple wants their product to exist with its halo intact after a year of use by real people. In order to do that, they&#8217;ve set up the program to license the necessary electronics to people who &#8211; in return for boasting &#8220;Made for iPod&#8221; &#8211; are prepared to conform to Apple&#8217;s quality standards.</p>
<p>People who don&#8217;t want to adhere to Apple&#8217;s standards are free to manufacture compatible hardware, but they won&#8217;t be able to use the &#8220;Made for iPod&#8221; trademark.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an Apple user. The reason I use Apple products is that they&#8217;re generally made to a higher quality standard than the rest of the market, and Apple pays a lot of attention to UI and basic looks.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want my Apple experience cheapened by some third-rate company manufacturing junk headphones passing them off as &#8220;Made for iPod&#8221; thankyouverymuch.</p>
<p>Can people just get over the initial hysteria and realise that Apple <b>is</b> about control, but in this case it&#8217;s not the market that they&#8217;re trying to control, it&#8217;s the halo around their products that they&#8217;re trying to control.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a control freak and a snob, and I appreciate the efforts Apple goes to in order to ensure that my Apple &#8220;experience&#8221; is as pleasant as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Perry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/shuffles-hardware-drm-not-drm-at-allor-is-it/#comment-342295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Perry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19695#comment-342295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps what we need is for a clever group of industrial designers to come up with a new way to connect headsets. I&#039;ve seen shortwave radios from the 1930s that use larger versions of the same design we&#039;re using on today&#039;s complex gadgetry. After some eighty years, it just might be time for something new.

The new design would slip in easily without looking closely, much like the current design. But it would also lock in place and unlock easily or under force. My current iPod headphones disconnect much too easily. Phone-like ethernet connectors are much too hard to disconnect. We need something in between.

It&#039;d also allow for one connector to adapt to a wide array of roles. Insert mono (i.e. two-way radio or cellular) headphones in a stereo gadget, and both sides would carry sound. Insert stereo headphones in a mono device like a cell phone and again both sides work.

It there are controls, the controls follow some standard and adapt to a new role. Insert an iPod shuttle headphone in a two-way radio, and the volume control still works and the stop/start button becomes a transmit button. Headphones with mikes would work in devices that don&#039;t have mikes and vice-versa. Every headphone would not do everything a device might need, but it would do everything it could with finesse.

Get this design taken up as a standard, and the designers could charge a tiny fraction of a cent royalty on each one and still become very, very comfortable. And the rest of us would love them and be delighted to see an end to all the various headphones that are wasting our money, cluttering our drawers and leaving us confused.

And while they are working on that,  this very clever group could come up with a brilliant MagSafe-like replacement for the clunky, out-sized and downright-dangerous-on-a-laptop-when-someone-walks-by Ethernet connector.  It&#039;s big, it&#039;s ugly, and the hard-to-disconnect design was no doubt intended as a &quot;feature&quot; in the early 1980s, when computers meant desktops maintained by IP professionals. It&#039;s ill-adapted for today&#039;s grab-and-go laptop world.

--Mike Perry, Seattle]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps what we need is for a clever group of industrial designers to come up with a new way to connect headsets. I&#8217;ve seen shortwave radios from the 1930s that use larger versions of the same design we&#8217;re using on today&#8217;s complex gadgetry. After some eighty years, it just might be time for something new.</p>
<p>The new design would slip in easily without looking closely, much like the current design. But it would also lock in place and unlock easily or under force. My current iPod headphones disconnect much too easily. Phone-like ethernet connectors are much too hard to disconnect. We need something in between.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d also allow for one connector to adapt to a wide array of roles. Insert mono (i.e. two-way radio or cellular) headphones in a stereo gadget, and both sides would carry sound. Insert stereo headphones in a mono device like a cell phone and again both sides work.</p>
<p>It there are controls, the controls follow some standard and adapt to a new role. Insert an iPod shuttle headphone in a two-way radio, and the volume control still works and the stop/start button becomes a transmit button. Headphones with mikes would work in devices that don&#8217;t have mikes and vice-versa. Every headphone would not do everything a device might need, but it would do everything it could with finesse.</p>
<p>Get this design taken up as a standard, and the designers could charge a tiny fraction of a cent royalty on each one and still become very, very comfortable. And the rest of us would love them and be delighted to see an end to all the various headphones that are wasting our money, cluttering our drawers and leaving us confused.</p>
<p>And while they are working on that,  this very clever group could come up with a brilliant MagSafe-like replacement for the clunky, out-sized and downright-dangerous-on-a-laptop-when-someone-walks-by Ethernet connector.  It&#8217;s big, it&#8217;s ugly, and the hard-to-disconnect design was no doubt intended as a &#8220;feature&#8221; in the early 1980s, when computers meant desktops maintained by IP professionals. It&#8217;s ill-adapted for today&#8217;s grab-and-go laptop world.</p>
<p>&#8211;Mike Perry, Seattle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Champs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/shuffles-hardware-drm-not-drm-at-allor-is-it/#comment-342294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Champs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19695#comment-342294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Apple is to be defended (and I&#039;m not sure thats the case) here, it&#039;s that if you&#039;re trying to get fancy with a Shuffle, you fail. Use its stupid buds or get yourself a real iPod.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Apple is to be defended (and I&#8217;m not sure thats the case) here, it&#8217;s that if you&#8217;re trying to get fancy with a Shuffle, you fail. Use its stupid buds or get yourself a real iPod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/shuffles-hardware-drm-not-drm-at-allor-is-it/#comment-342293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19695#comment-342293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Apple controlling their intellectual property (the iPod brand name) is some how evil? This is good business. And they even said they will tolerate third party headphones that offer control functionality even if they do not apply for a &quot;Made for iPod&quot; license. I don&#039;t see why everyone&#039;s panties are in a bunch.

You should get your panties in a bunch about the price of a ridiculously low functionality mp3 player being $80, when, as I said before, you could stop by walmart and pick up one that fits in your pocket or clips on your shirt just fine for about $10.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Apple controlling their intellectual property (the iPod brand name) is some how evil? This is good business. And they even said they will tolerate third party headphones that offer control functionality even if they do not apply for a &#8220;Made for iPod&#8221; license. I don&#8217;t see why everyone&#8217;s panties are in a bunch.</p>
<p>You should get your panties in a bunch about the price of a ridiculously low functionality mp3 player being $80, when, as I said before, you could stop by walmart and pick up one that fits in your pocket or clips on your shirt just fine for about $10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/shuffles-hardware-drm-not-drm-at-allor-is-it/#comment-342292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19695#comment-342292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget...Apple&#039;s number one concernin new design is always the customer&#039;s experience.  Unique Hardware design is not usually meant as a proprietary hinderance to third party product (unlike Sony, et. al.). I remember asking an Apple tech why I couldn&#039;t &quot;just&quot; use my camcorder&#039;s existing red-white-yellow (rca) to mini-jack cable with an iPod Video... I wondered aloud to him if Apple just wanted to bilk me out of an extra $20-30 for &quot;their&quot; cable...His response was that If I had wanted that ability to swap in a third-party cable, I also wanted a bigger iPod.  In order to fit the internal components into the design, they had to make things themselves.  So I benefit from the positives of Apple by means of their design.  At times I also simply have to keep &quot;Apples&quot; with &quot;Apples&quot; to get that benefit!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget&#8230;Apple&#8217;s number one concernin new design is always the customer&#8217;s experience.  Unique Hardware design is not usually meant as a proprietary hinderance to third party product (unlike Sony, et. al.). I remember asking an Apple tech why I couldn&#8217;t &#8220;just&#8221; use my camcorder&#8217;s existing red-white-yellow (rca) to mini-jack cable with an iPod Video&#8230; I wondered aloud to him if Apple just wanted to bilk me out of an extra $20-30 for &#8220;their&#8221; cable&#8230;His response was that If I had wanted that ability to swap in a third-party cable, I also wanted a bigger iPod.  In order to fit the internal components into the design, they had to make things themselves.  So I benefit from the positives of Apple by means of their design.  At times I also simply have to keep &#8220;Apples&#8221; with &#8220;Apples&#8221; to get that benefit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/shuffles-hardware-drm-not-drm-at-allor-is-it/#comment-342291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19695#comment-342291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another step that tightens Apple&#039;s control on consumers.  In the last year, Apple&#039;s shifting strategies have me convinced that Apple is now less concerned with customer satisfaction (via openness and compatibility) than with corporate financials.  While I am now concerned enough to explore alternative operating systems and platforms, the sad fact is that I haven&#039;t found anything remotely as usable.  *sigh*  It&#039;s a trap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another step that tightens Apple&#8217;s control on consumers.  In the last year, Apple&#8217;s shifting strategies have me convinced that Apple is now less concerned with customer satisfaction (via openness and compatibility) than with corporate financials.  While I am now concerned enough to explore alternative operating systems and platforms, the sad fact is that I haven&#8217;t found anything remotely as usable.  *sigh*  It&#8217;s a trap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

