<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor Has It: Next-Gen Mac Pro Getting Six-Core &#8220;Core i9&#8243; Processor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-next-gen-mac-pro-getting-six-core-core-i9-processor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-next-gen-mac-pro-getting-six-core-core-i9-processor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-next-gen-mac-pro-getting-six-core-core-i9-processor/#comment-359456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=34206#comment-359456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I truly think Apple is more concerned with ipad and iphones, macbooks, macbook pros, THAN MAC PRO. In fact, there is even a rumor possibly stating that the mac pro might not survive another few years because its a niche product.

Sad, but true... but, Apple is more interested in electronics such as ipad, ipod, iphone over the mac pro. So, don&#039;t waste your breath if you don&#039;t see a 2010 mac pro because it won&#039;t make Apple money like the ipad and the rest of its products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I truly think Apple is more concerned with ipad and iphones, macbooks, macbook pros, THAN MAC PRO. In fact, there is even a rumor possibly stating that the mac pro might not survive another few years because its a niche product.</p>
<p>Sad, but true&#8230; but, Apple is more interested in electronics such as ipad, ipod, iphone over the mac pro. So, don&#8217;t waste your breath if you don&#8217;t see a 2010 mac pro because it won&#8217;t make Apple money like the ipad and the rest of its products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-next-gen-mac-pro-getting-six-core-core-i9-processor/#comment-359455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=34206#comment-359455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am afraid to see the pricetag on that. =P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am afraid to see the pricetag on that. =P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-next-gen-mac-pro-getting-six-core-core-i9-processor/#comment-359454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=34206#comment-359454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Sometime in early 2009&quot;?

Um, what&#039;s today? What&#039;s next -- you think Obama *might* beat McCain in 2008?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sometime in early 2009&#8243;?</p>
<p>Um, what&#8217;s today? What&#8217;s next &#8212; you think Obama *might* beat McCain in 2008?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

