<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor Has It: Apple to Refresh MacBook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 15:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/#comment-593729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31406#comment-593729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Latchless lids were introduced with the original iBook]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latchless lids were introduced with the original iBook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Laptop News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News: &#8220;Rumor Has It: Apple to Refresh MacBook&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/#comment-355282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mac Laptop News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News: &#8220;Rumor Has It: Apple to Refresh MacBook&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31406#comment-355282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Rumor Has It: Apple to Refresh MacBook on TheAppleBlogTopics: MacBook [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rumor Has It: Apple to Refresh MacBook on TheAppleBlogTopics: MacBook [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tmanic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/#comment-355281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tmanic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31406#comment-355281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m almost hoping this doesn&#039;t turn out to be true. I just got my first Macbook Pro since I needed a new computer ASAP, and even managed to find a good deal here - http://www.computersncs.com/rd_p?p=191613&amp;t=9544&amp;a=29670-macapple&amp;gift=29277 

I guess I&#039;ll just have to be ready to upgrade if these new ones do get released. That or hope they aren&#039;t too insanely better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m almost hoping this doesn&#8217;t turn out to be true. I just got my first Macbook Pro since I needed a new computer ASAP, and even managed to find a good deal here &#8211; <a href="http://www.computersncs.com/rd_p?p=191613&#038;t=9544&#038;a=29670-macapple&#038;gift=29277" rel="nofollow">http://www.computersncs.com/rd_p?p=191613&#038;t=9544&#038;a=29670-macapple&#038;gift=29277</a> </p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll just have to be ready to upgrade if these new ones do get released. That or hope they aren&#8217;t too insanely better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jl</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/#comment-355280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31406#comment-355280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the chances that we&#039;ll see something for the macbook pros in upcoming 9 September 2009 event? Or will it be much longer/later before we see a refresh of the macbook pros?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the chances that we&#8217;ll see something for the macbook pros in upcoming 9 September 2009 event? Or will it be much longer/later before we see a refresh of the macbook pros?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwall_hp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/#comment-355279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[redwall_hp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31406#comment-355279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;it has a solid state hard drive, if u drop it its probably going to break.&quot;

Uh...no. SSDs &lt;i&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; break when you drop them, or at least they&#039;re a lot less likely to than with a traditional mechanical disk. They also have much faster seek times, which means better performance when you&#039;re doing a lot of disk reads. However, SSDs are still a fairly new technology and the overall life of the drive is largely unknown. They have a finite amount of times that they can be written to before sectors stop functioning properly.

Also, you can buy a MacBook Air with a traditional hard drive instead of an SSD: http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_mac/family/macbook_air]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it has a solid state hard drive, if u drop it its probably going to break.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh&#8230;no. SSDs <i>don&#8217;t</i> break when you drop them, or at least they&#8217;re a lot less likely to than with a traditional mechanical disk. They also have much faster seek times, which means better performance when you&#8217;re doing a lot of disk reads. However, SSDs are still a fairly new technology and the overall life of the drive is largely unknown. They have a finite amount of times that they can be written to before sectors stop functioning properly.</p>
<p>Also, you can buy a MacBook Air with a traditional hard drive instead of an SSD: <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_mac/family/macbook_air" rel="nofollow">http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_mac/family/macbook_air</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crmit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/#comment-355278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crmit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31406#comment-355278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[personaly i dont trust the macbook air for one reason and one reason only.
it has a solid state hard drive, if u drop it its probably going to break.  but making it out of carbon-fiber would be a good idea. i think it can withstand a larger impact than aluminum]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personaly i dont trust the macbook air for one reason and one reason only.<br />
it has a solid state hard drive, if u drop it its probably going to break.  but making it out of carbon-fiber would be a good idea. i think it can withstand a larger impact than aluminum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thursday Morning News &#124; MacTalk Australia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/#comment-355277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thursday Morning News &#124; MacTalk Australia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31406#comment-355277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is all alone in that little quadrant, being lame. Surely Apple has something up their sleeve? The Apple Blog has heard some rumours regarding a MacBook [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is all alone in that little quadrant, being lame. Surely Apple has something up their sleeve? The Apple Blog has heard some rumours regarding a MacBook [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Champs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/#comment-355276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Champs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31406#comment-355276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon fiber is a fairly expensive replacement for plastic.

Just sayin&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carbon fiber is a fairly expensive replacement for plastic.</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Maier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/#comment-355275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Maier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31406#comment-355275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THANK GOD you got it. We found the ominous &quot;tablet&quot; which is none, because they don&#039;t have an OS for a tablet bigger than the iPone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK GOD you got it. We found the ominous &#8220;tablet&#8221; which is none, because they don&#8217;t have an OS for a tablet bigger than the iPone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almostinfocus</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/rumor-has-it-apple-to-refresh-macbook/#comment-355274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[almostinfocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31406#comment-355274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does the price point have to stay at $999 if it&#039;s (rumored) to be a low cost solution?  Is it really worth the r&amp;d and all the other expenses just to release a lower power version at the same price?  And if it is lower powered, then only $200 between this model and a unibody pro seems like too little of a price distinction, considering the specs on the current MacBook compare well with the unibody pro.

Maybe this is Apple&#039;s chance to develop and release their version of a netbook.  I don&#039;t think that has to mean a sub $500, 10 inch screen.  But what about a $799 version and a $999 version of a MacBook, under 4 pounds, and minus the optical media drive.  That $999 version can compare spec-wise to the current MacBook, but the $799 version can use the older or lower end parts.  And maybe, just maybe, that $799 version is finally the 12 inch PowerBook replacement of which so many have dreamed.  But even if it&#039;s not a 12 inch, I think the general idea is valid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the price point have to stay at $999 if it&#8217;s (rumored) to be a low cost solution?  Is it really worth the r&amp;d and all the other expenses just to release a lower power version at the same price?  And if it is lower powered, then only $200 between this model and a unibody pro seems like too little of a price distinction, considering the specs on the current MacBook compare well with the unibody pro.</p>
<p>Maybe this is Apple&#8217;s chance to develop and release their version of a netbook.  I don&#8217;t think that has to mean a sub $500, 10 inch screen.  But what about a $799 version and a $999 version of a MacBook, under 4 pounds, and minus the optical media drive.  That $999 version can compare spec-wise to the current MacBook, but the $799 version can use the older or lower end parts.  And maybe, just maybe, that $799 version is finally the 12 inch PowerBook replacement of which so many have dreamed.  But even if it&#8217;s not a 12 inch, I think the general idea is valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

