<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Really? ThinkSecret writing for PC Mag?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Houghton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320898</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Houghton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think most people will agree that ThinkSecret today is a mere shadow of its former self, however I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s necessary to slam them like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most people will agree that ThinkSecret today is a mere shadow of its former self, however I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s necessary to slam them like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Tawes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kendall Tawes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this going to be like how Fox tries to pass off what it says as &quot;News&quot; or &quot;Facts&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this going to be like how Fox tries to pass off what it says as &#8220;News&#8221; or &#8220;Facts&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that I have any love for PC Mag or ThinkSecret, but here&#039;s the thing...

YOU READ THE ARTICLE!

That&#039;s what they wanted from you. And you will continue to read the articles, if for no other reason than to see how stupid it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I have any love for PC Mag or ThinkSecret, but here&#8217;s the thing&#8230;</p>
<p>YOU READ THE ARTICLE!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what they wanted from you. And you will continue to read the articles, if for no other reason than to see how stupid it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lloyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 08:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said. These rabit out of the hat &#039;rumours&#039; just set people up for disappointment and must really get on Apple&#039;s nerves. I&#039;m not ass-kissing but I much prefer the open speculation on the Apple Blog which freely discusses posibilities of what we could see rather than picking a date, saying it&#039;s coming and then taking all the credit when 1 out of 10 &#039;rumours&#039; turn out to be right (typically a rumour along the lines of &quot;faster processors coming soon&quot; - duh?!?!).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. These rabit out of the hat &#8216;rumours&#8217; just set people up for disappointment and must really get on Apple&#8217;s nerves. I&#8217;m not ass-kissing but I much prefer the open speculation on the Apple Blog which freely discusses posibilities of what we could see rather than picking a date, saying it&#8217;s coming and then taking all the credit when 1 out of 10 &#8216;rumours&#8217; turn out to be right (typically a rumour along the lines of &#8220;faster processors coming soon&#8221; &#8211; duh?!?!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guess what just hit me? I could start my own top secret Apple blog. Come on Sparky! Pick a ticket for today&#039;s rumor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess what just hit me? I could start my own top secret Apple blog. Come on Sparky! Pick a ticket for today&#8217;s rumor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably gonna remove ThinkSecret from my RSS feeds. The Apple Blog is getting better and better. I remember a time when it was something around 1 post per day or so, but now it&#039;s better.

ThinkSecret should come up with some rumors that are more plausible and actually happen at the date specified.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably gonna remove ThinkSecret from my RSS feeds. The Apple Blog is getting better and better. I remember a time when it was something around 1 post per day or so, but now it&#8217;s better.</p>
<p>ThinkSecret should come up with some rumors that are more plausible and actually happen at the date specified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not me</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lame, you failed to mention the times &quot;they&quot; had it right. Convenient I guess. I fail to see what appeal this has for your readers. For me, a rant about a RUMOR site is a waste of space and time. Then again Im writing this and wasting even more of it by letting you know. Well, time to waste it somewhere else...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lame, you failed to mention the times &#8220;they&#8221; had it right. Convenient I guess. I fail to see what appeal this has for your readers. For me, a rant about a RUMOR site is a waste of space and time. Then again Im writing this and wasting even more of it by letting you know. Well, time to waste it somewhere else&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Churry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Churry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 03:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-320894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

