<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuickTime to Come With Pro Features in Snow Leopard?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: boomer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/#comment-339756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boomer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=16804#comment-339756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;but if you want to rotate video with Quicktime X (the snow leopard version), your out of luck.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but if you want to rotate video with Quicktime X (the snow leopard version), your out of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Look at Snow Leopard: New Features From the Latest Build - TheAppleBlog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/#comment-339755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Look at Snow Leopard: New Features From the Latest Build - TheAppleBlog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=16804#comment-339755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] but that applications have an &#8220;Open in 32-bit&#8221; mode as well. As we&#8217;ve noted previously, Quicktime Pro features are all enabled by default, although Quicktime X is still missing. The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but that applications have an &#8220;Open in 32-bit&#8221; mode as well. As we&#8217;ve noted previously, Quicktime Pro features are all enabled by default, although Quicktime X is still missing. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Downer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/#comment-339754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip Downer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=16804#comment-339754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds good to me. I&#039;ve always wanted to be able to rotate movie clips I&#039;ve shot on a digital camera - But I&#039;m not going to pay the extra bucks for it.

Would give me another reason (besides common-sense) to keep using a Mac. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good to me. I&#8217;ve always wanted to be able to rotate movie clips I&#8217;ve shot on a digital camera &#8211; But I&#8217;m not going to pay the extra bucks for it.</p>
<p>Would give me another reason (besides common-sense) to keep using a Mac. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dadditude</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/#comment-339753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dadditude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=16804#comment-339753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember when Apple first decided to offer a &quot;Pro&quot; version of Quicktime. Many of the &quot;Pro&quot; features (including full-screen playback and the ability to save movies) were included FOR FREE in the previous non-pro version. Many long-time Mac users were outraged by it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when Apple first decided to offer a &#8220;Pro&#8221; version of Quicktime. Many of the &#8220;Pro&#8221; features (including full-screen playback and the ability to save movies) were included FOR FREE in the previous non-pro version. Many long-time Mac users were outraged by it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ash</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/#comment-339752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=16804#comment-339752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember those days when movies werent playable fullscreen else for PRO.. that was pathetic..

but I feel pro can come along with OS snow leopard !! they do give Ilife (such an amazing package) .. they could well give a thot to Qtime-PRO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember those days when movies werent playable fullscreen else for PRO.. that was pathetic..</p>
<p>but I feel pro can come along with OS snow leopard !! they do give Ilife (such an amazing package) .. they could well give a thot to Qtime-PRO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Etherington</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/#comment-339751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darrell Etherington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=16804#comment-339751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@PeterVk

Haha, I remember that. It was awful! That seemed to me to be motivated by pure contempt for their customers. I mean full screen? C&#039;mon!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@PeterVk</p>
<p>Haha, I remember that. It was awful! That seemed to me to be motivated by pure contempt for their customers. I mean full screen? C&#8217;mon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murphy Mac</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/#comment-339750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murphy Mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=16804#comment-339750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seeing PRO all over the menus without it would drive me insane.

They&#039;ve been holding this back for too long.  It&#039;s not the kind of thing you charge extra for in 2009.  

Apple builds goodwill by not requiring OS activation or even a product key.  Holding back features like Pro cancels some of that out.  It&#039;s a bush move to charge for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing PRO all over the menus without it would drive me insane.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve been holding this back for too long.  It&#8217;s not the kind of thing you charge extra for in 2009.  </p>
<p>Apple builds goodwill by not requiring OS activation or even a product key.  Holding back features like Pro cancels some of that out.  It&#8217;s a bush move to charge for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home Based Business Health</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/#comment-339749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Home Based Business Health]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=16804#comment-339749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hahahah yeah, that&#039;s annoying]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahah yeah, that&#8217;s annoying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/#comment-339748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=16804#comment-339748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yay!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterVk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/quicktime-to-come-with-pro-features-in-snow-leopard/#comment-339747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PeterVk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=16804#comment-339747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a point in the recent past QuickTime wouldn&#039;t even let you play movies full screen without upgrading to the &#039;pro&#039; version. Yeah, only a pro needs to watch movies full screen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a point in the recent past QuickTime wouldn&#8217;t even let you play movies full screen without upgrading to the &#8216;pro&#8217; version. Yeah, only a pro needs to watch movies full screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

