<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parallels Kowtow-ing to Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/parallels-kowtow-ing-to-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/parallels-kowtow-ing-to-apple/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/parallels-kowtow-ing-to-apple/#comment-318021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/12/parallels-kowtow-ing-to-apple/#comment-318021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you buy a OS X retail package you are buying a license to use it, and you agree to use it on Apple computers, if you don&#039;t do this...well they (Apple) can  terminate your license and even sue you. Parallels don&#039;t do this (OS X virtualization for Wintel machines) because they know they can be sued, the same happened to connectix when they relesead a Playstation virtual machine for Mac OS years ago. Apple doesn&#039;t want anybody running OS X on wintel boxes.They&#039;re protecting what they have payed for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you buy a OS X retail package you are buying a license to use it, and you agree to use it on Apple computers, if you don&#8217;t do this&#8230;well they (Apple) can  terminate your license and even sue you. Parallels don&#8217;t do this (OS X virtualization for Wintel machines) because they know they can be sued, the same happened to connectix when they relesead a Playstation virtual machine for Mac OS years ago. Apple doesn&#8217;t want anybody running OS X on wintel boxes.They&#8217;re protecting what they have payed for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Smith</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/parallels-kowtow-ing-to-apple/#comment-318022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/12/parallels-kowtow-ing-to-apple/#comment-318022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s one good reason why Parallels don&#039;t let you do this:
&#039;A. This License allows you to install and use one copy of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled computer at a time.&#039;

A virtual machine produced by Parallels isn&#039;t an &#039;Apple-labeled&#039; computer, it may be running on one, but the virtual machine isn&#039;t.

Also you need to buy a second copy to run on the virtual machine, which I&#039;m sure most users would forget to do. Since Apple don&#039;t have any way of tracking licence use, apart from it not functioning on non-Apple hardware, ensuring that they aren&#039;t being ripped-off by a large number of users isn&#039;t possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one good reason why Parallels don&#8217;t let you do this:<br />
&#8216;A. This License allows you to install and use one copy of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled computer at a time.&#8217;</p>
<p>A virtual machine produced by Parallels isn&#8217;t an &#8216;Apple-labeled&#8217; computer, it may be running on one, but the virtual machine isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Also you need to buy a second copy to run on the virtual machine, which I&#8217;m sure most users would forget to do. Since Apple don&#8217;t have any way of tracking licence use, apart from it not functioning on non-Apple hardware, ensuring that they aren&#8217;t being ripped-off by a large number of users isn&#8217;t possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen G.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/parallels-kowtow-ing-to-apple/#comment-318023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allen G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/12/parallels-kowtow-ing-to-apple/#comment-318023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a thought that would be really cool: what if Leopard can be installed on PCs.  That would certainly explain why Apple is telling Parallels to hold off.  Can you imagine an OS X install DVD that would run on ANY platform?  BRILLIANT!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a thought that would be really cool: what if Leopard can be installed on PCs.  That would certainly explain why Apple is telling Parallels to hold off.  Can you imagine an OS X install DVD that would run on ANY platform?  BRILLIANT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Korleski</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/parallels-kowtow-ing-to-apple/#comment-318024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Korleski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/12/parallels-kowtow-ing-to-apple/#comment-318024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think OS 9 virtualization will come back to OS X Intel Macs really soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think OS 9 virtualization will come back to OS X Intel Macs really soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

