<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Farting iPhones: Where should Apple draw the line?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly App Store Roundup: Dec. 27, 2008 &#124; TheAppleBlog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-331830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weekly App Store Roundup: Dec. 27, 2008 &#124; TheAppleBlog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-331830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] That&#8217;s it for the 2008. I&#8217;ll be back next year with the first weekly roundup of 2009. Here&#8217;s hoping we see more polished, useful and entertaining apps and fewer shoddy, flatulence-based cash-ins. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s it for the 2008. I&#8217;ll be back next year with the first weekly roundup of 2009. Here&#8217;s hoping we see more polished, useful and entertaining apps and fewer shoddy, flatulence-based cash-ins. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: App Store Deal of the Week: Effector &#124; The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-331829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[App Store Deal of the Week: Effector &#124; The Apple Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-331829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] two months ago, we penned the sad news that Air-O-Matic&#8217;s &#8220;Pull My Finger&#8221; application was denied from entry to the App [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two months ago, we penned the sad news that Air-O-Matic&#8217;s &#8220;Pull My Finger&#8221; application was denied from entry to the App [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Covers App Store Denials with NDA &#124; The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-331828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Covers App Store Denials with NDA &#124; The Apple Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-331828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of seemingly useful applications like Podcaster for example (and some not so useful apps like Pull My Finger, which I totally would have paid $.99 for!), and Apple&#8217;s not exactly the, um, apple of our [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of seemingly useful applications like Podcaster for example (and some not so useful apps like Pull My Finger, which I totally would have paid $.99 for!), and Apple&#8217;s not exactly the, um, apple of our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aztecprowler</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-331813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aztecprowler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-331813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe my app might have been the first app like this rejected by Apple.  My biggest complaint with Apple rejecting my app relates to the fact that Apple has no issues with selling music with very explicit and vulgar language.  In addition, Apple sells and rents movies that would be considered unacceptable by some individuals.  I believe users should have to the right to choose and not have Apple make that decision for them.  If Apple wants to protect their users, add content ratings to the apps. I have a list of users wanting to buy my application so my only resort at this time is to use adhoc distribution which I plan to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe my app might have been the first app like this rejected by Apple.  My biggest complaint with Apple rejecting my app relates to the fact that Apple has no issues with selling music with very explicit and vulgar language.  In addition, Apple sells and rents movies that would be considered unacceptable by some individuals.  I believe users should have to the right to choose and not have Apple make that decision for them.  If Apple wants to protect their users, add content ratings to the apps. I have a list of users wanting to buy my application so my only resort at this time is to use adhoc distribution which I plan to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Broken Record Keeps Playing: Why Apple&#8217;s App Store Approval Process is Broken &#124; The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-331827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Broken Record Keeps Playing: Why Apple&#8217;s App Store Approval Process is Broken &#124; The Apple Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-331827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] feel like we&#8217;re a bit of a broken record on this topic, but I just don&#8217;t think people are grasping how big of a deal this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] feel like we&#8217;re a bit of a broken record on this topic, but I just don&#8217;t think people are grasping how big of a deal this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaxzan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-331826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zaxzan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-331826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry! ... baked beans for lunch.

In all honesty - without access to the pertinent particulars as to why Apple have taken this approach - imho it is absurd for Apple to expurgate in this fashion.

Apple may well radiate a sense of urbane sophistication, but they do not have a mandate to qualify social behavior across the community.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry! &#8230; baked beans for lunch.</p>
<p>In all honesty &#8211; without access to the pertinent particulars as to why Apple have taken this approach &#8211; imho it is absurd for Apple to expurgate in this fashion.</p>
<p>Apple may well radiate a sense of urbane sophistication, but they do not have a mandate to qualify social behavior across the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaxzan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-331825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zaxzan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-331825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phffffft!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phffffft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-331824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-331824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel burping applications should be the absolute limit :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel burping applications should be the absolute limit :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-331810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-331810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only reason to draw a line (putting security aside for a second) is to stop the store becoming awash with useless apps so that you can&#039;t find the good ones.  It gives the impression of apps being a folly, no better than email forwards and not a reason to buy an iphone.

Suitably hidden at the back, out of the way, I don&#039;t see the harm - well, except for the horror of hundreds of kids playing fart sounds on the bus but that&#039;s besides the point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason to draw a line (putting security aside for a second) is to stop the store becoming awash with useless apps so that you can&#8217;t find the good ones.  It gives the impression of apps being a folly, no better than email forwards and not a reason to buy an iphone.</p>
<p>Suitably hidden at the back, out of the way, I don&#8217;t see the harm &#8211; well, except for the horror of hundreds of kids playing fart sounds on the bus but that&#8217;s besides the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edgar Brown</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-331823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edgar Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-331823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are obvious problems with letting all applications in, but deciding what should get in and what shouldn&#039;t has multiple problems (including liability). To make life easier for themselves, Apple could let the users set their own policy.

Set a &#039;quarantine&#039; section for applications. Apple could set a policy such as &#039;any iffy application goes into the quarantine section&#039;. If a user wants to look into that section all the customary warnings should pop up, then people can evaluate and download the applications, rate them, and if they are deemed &#039;worthy&#039;  (by the users) could automatically show up in the real store. They could extend this to a full rating system in which user&#039;s evaluation tags the application into specific categories (e.g., childish pranks and jokes, or useless but fun for a while). That way developers could not complain to Apple for their placement, it is their own users setting the policy (and each user can set their own &#039;tag threshold&#039;)

This policy could be extended to &#039;any application that remains quarantined for a month is deleted&#039; or even &#039;it costs $30 a month to keep an application in quarantine after the first month&#039;. Better yet, extend this to the whole store, &#039;if your application is not downloaded more than 100 times a month it has to cost at least $1, and if it is not downloaded more than 10 times a month after that it goes into the garage sale section and you have to pay Apple to keep it there unless you are evaluated 4 stars or above&#039;.

In short, Apple should 1) allow everything, or almost anything, in (i.e., a very clear policy for developers), 2) allow the users themselves decide what is &#039;worthy&#039; of being in the store, 3) allow for the different threshold of &#039;worthiness&#039; of each individual user, 4) set a real cost for the developers to keep crap present in the iPhone store, 5) make sure that really valuable applications that are useful for very small communities can remain in the store.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are obvious problems with letting all applications in, but deciding what should get in and what shouldn&#8217;t has multiple problems (including liability). To make life easier for themselves, Apple could let the users set their own policy.</p>
<p>Set a &#8216;quarantine&#8217; section for applications. Apple could set a policy such as &#8216;any iffy application goes into the quarantine section&#8217;. If a user wants to look into that section all the customary warnings should pop up, then people can evaluate and download the applications, rate them, and if they are deemed &#8216;worthy&#8217;  (by the users) could automatically show up in the real store. They could extend this to a full rating system in which user&#8217;s evaluation tags the application into specific categories (e.g., childish pranks and jokes, or useless but fun for a while). That way developers could not complain to Apple for their placement, it is their own users setting the policy (and each user can set their own &#8216;tag threshold&#8217;)</p>
<p>This policy could be extended to &#8216;any application that remains quarantined for a month is deleted&#8217; or even &#8216;it costs $30 a month to keep an application in quarantine after the first month&#8217;. Better yet, extend this to the whole store, &#8216;if your application is not downloaded more than 100 times a month it has to cost at least $1, and if it is not downloaded more than 10 times a month after that it goes into the garage sale section and you have to pay Apple to keep it there unless you are evaluated 4 stars or above&#8217;.</p>
<p>In short, Apple should 1) allow everything, or almost anything, in (i.e., a very clear policy for developers), 2) allow the users themselves decide what is &#8216;worthy&#8217; of being in the store, 3) allow for the different threshold of &#8216;worthiness&#8217; of each individual user, 4) set a real cost for the developers to keep crap present in the iPhone store, 5) make sure that really valuable applications that are useful for very small communities can remain in the store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

