<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official iPhone Tethering Rumored to Cost $30/month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/official-iphone-tethering-rumored-to-cost-30month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/official-iphone-tethering-rumored-to-cost-30month/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:38:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt J</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/official-iphone-tethering-rumored-to-cost-30month/#comment-335529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10431#comment-335529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or get unlimited tethering for $free/month when you jailbreak. Decisions, decisions…

You are of course aware that tethering is at this point against your terms of use contract. And my suspicion is that AT&amp;T will get stricter on those tethering without the tethering plan, once there is an official way to do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or get unlimited tethering for $free/month when you jailbreak. Decisions, decisions…</p>
<p>You are of course aware that tethering is at this point against your terms of use contract. And my suspicion is that AT&amp;T will get stricter on those tethering without the tethering plan, once there is an official way to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Perlman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/official-iphone-tethering-rumored-to-cost-30month/#comment-335528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Perlman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10431#comment-335528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&amp;T is probably being so crazy about the data plan usage caps in order to keep their network from collapsing, as we&#039;ve seen happen in the recent past. Perhaps they don&#039;t want people streaming video to their notebooks tethered to their iPhones.

I&#039;m betting that AT&amp;T is being stricter with data plans on the iPhone than they are with the BlackBerry devices because business users (who often favor BlackBerry) are more willing to give up their money to the telcos for data services than consumers are. It&#039;s hard to say that the iPhone is not a consumer focused device - the iPod software and the camera are most likely aimed at Lizzy the college student more than John the entrprenuer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T is probably being so crazy about the data plan usage caps in order to keep their network from collapsing, as we&#8217;ve seen happen in the recent past. Perhaps they don&#8217;t want people streaming video to their notebooks tethered to their iPhones.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m betting that AT&amp;T is being stricter with data plans on the iPhone than they are with the BlackBerry devices because business users (who often favor BlackBerry) are more willing to give up their money to the telcos for data services than consumers are. It&#8217;s hard to say that the iPhone is not a consumer focused device &#8211; the iPod software and the camera are most likely aimed at Lizzy the college student more than John the entrprenuer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/official-iphone-tethering-rumored-to-cost-30month/#comment-335527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10431#comment-335527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or get unlimited tethering for $free/month when you jailbreak.  Decisions, decisions...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or get unlimited tethering for $free/month when you jailbreak.  Decisions, decisions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Reestman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/official-iphone-tethering-rumored-to-cost-30month/#comment-335526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Reestman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10431#comment-335526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no idea why anyone would be surprised that AT&amp;T would charge for this. The $30 monthly fee paid now is for data TO ONE DEVICE (i.e., the iPhone). It was not promised or intended as a free conduit for high-speed access to any other device you happened to have handy.

Meanwhile, the NetShare app is nothing more than a leach off a service Nullriver doesn&#039;t provide. Bringing them up in this article gives them more credit than they deserve. Awfully nice of them to write an app to &quot;steal&quot; bandwidth that&#039;s not theirs, for use in a manner that is prohibited, and to charge you for the privilege. Then, when they got called on their leaching, they throw up their hands and act surprised? Please.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea why anyone would be surprised that AT&#038;T would charge for this. The $30 monthly fee paid now is for data TO ONE DEVICE (i.e., the iPhone). It was not promised or intended as a free conduit for high-speed access to any other device you happened to have handy.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the NetShare app is nothing more than a leach off a service Nullriver doesn&#8217;t provide. Bringing them up in this article gives them more credit than they deserve. Awfully nice of them to write an app to &#8220;steal&#8221; bandwidth that&#8217;s not theirs, for use in a manner that is prohibited, and to charge you for the privilege. Then, when they got called on their leaching, they throw up their hands and act surprised? Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

