<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Iteration of iPods Flash Based?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/next-iteration-of-ipods-flash-based/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/next-iteration-of-ipods-flash-based/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/next-iteration-of-ipods-flash-based/#comment-317886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/08/next-iteration-of-ipods-flash-based/#comment-317886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guys, I love your site, but I think you&#039;re overstating the case here.  It doesn&#039;t &quot;sound&quot; like anything other than an analyst speculating that Apple&#039;s considering moving to all-flash and, well, lots of us speculate such a move without being analysts (or having any real knowledge of the situation).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, I love your site, but I think you&#8217;re overstating the case here.  It doesn&#8217;t &#8220;sound&#8221; like anything other than an analyst speculating that Apple&#8217;s considering moving to all-flash and, well, lots of us speculate such a move without being analysts (or having any real knowledge of the situation).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twist</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/next-iteration-of-ipods-flash-based/#comment-317885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 02:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/08/next-iteration-of-ipods-flash-based/#comment-317885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see Video iPod&#039;s using flash based storage but I still think there needs to be disc based solutions as well for the users who would rather have higher capacity. A lot of iPod&#039;s sit on desks at peoples works or in cup holders in the car for most of their lives and don&#039;t really need the greater durability that solid state storage offers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see Video iPod&#8217;s using flash based storage but I still think there needs to be disc based solutions as well for the users who would rather have higher capacity. A lot of iPod&#8217;s sit on desks at peoples works or in cup holders in the car for most of their lives and don&#8217;t really need the greater durability that solid state storage offers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

