<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Territory For Apple &#8211; 10.4.10 Being Seeded?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: minikperi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[minikperi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/18/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good nwes sir]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good nwes sir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas040</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thomas040]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/18/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if I remember correctly, system 7.5.3 had a revision a ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if I remember correctly, system 7.5.3 had a revision a ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OS X 10.4.10 a caminho :: bernabauer.com - Noticias de Tecnologia todos os dias.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OS X 10.4.10 a caminho :: bernabauer.com - Noticias de Tecnologia todos os dias.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 22:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/18/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] detalhes nos blogs Think Secret, The Apple Blog (que aponta para ARS.Technica), MacRumors e AppleInsider. Compare preços :apple, problemas, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] detalhes nos blogs Think Secret, The Apple Blog (que aponta para ARS.Technica), MacRumors e AppleInsider. Compare preços :apple, problemas, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 04:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/18/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK...so how&#039;s about 10.4.9a?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK&#8230;so how&#8217;s about 10.4.9a?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joecab</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joecab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 03:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/18/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An easy way to convince yourself that it&#039;s not a decimal: Why would there be two of them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An easy way to convince yourself that it&#8217;s not a decimal: Why would there be two of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas040</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thomas040]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 16:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/18/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for clearing that up... :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for clearing that up&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/18/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s NOT DECIMAL !

. is NOT a separator for decimal.

it&quot;s JUST a separator  between MAJOR number version,  MINOR number version, REVISION number version, REVISION OF REVISION number version and so on

developpers can do EVERYTHING they want !

for exemple, linux is 2.6.22.  who dares to the contrary ?

the X protocol is X11R7  (11th number of the X protocol ,release 7 )

so,, apple can do 10.4.10. it would be logical after the 9 revision of the 4th version of their 10th operating system.

10 because... it&#039;s the TENTH revision !!!

but

apple could also do 10.4.9release34build250450edition423svn2007-05-14 and noone could prevent that.

do not forget os x 10.4.9 is in fact build 8P2137]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s NOT DECIMAL !</p>
<p>. is NOT a separator for decimal.</p>
<p>it&#8221;s JUST a separator  between MAJOR number version,  MINOR number version, REVISION number version, REVISION OF REVISION number version and so on</p>
<p>developpers can do EVERYTHING they want !</p>
<p>for exemple, linux is 2.6.22.  who dares to the contrary ?</p>
<p>the X protocol is X11R7  (11th number of the X protocol ,release 7 )</p>
<p>so,, apple can do 10.4.10. it would be logical after the 9 revision of the 4th version of their 10th operating system.</p>
<p>10 because&#8230; it&#8217;s the TENTH revision !!!</p>
<p>but</p>
<p>apple could also do 10.4.9release34build250450edition423svn2007-05-14 and noone could prevent that.</p>
<p>do not forget os x 10.4.9 is in fact build 8P2137</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Johnson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 18:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/18/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would 10.4.91 follow 10.4.9?

What part of 10.4.10 is the logical succesor to 10.4.9 is complicated?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would 10.4.91 follow 10.4.9?</p>
<p>What part of 10.4.10 is the logical succesor to 10.4.9 is complicated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Linder</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Linder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/18/new-territory-for-apple-10410-being-seeded/#comment-321038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t it be 10.4.9x? (x) being any number 1-9?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be 10.4.9x? (x) being any number 1-9?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

