<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NetworkWorld: iPods are &#8216;security threat&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 12:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/11/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think publications are focusing on iPods primarily due to recent media news such as the pod slurping issue (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sharp-ideas.net/pod_slurping.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sharp-ideas.net/pod_slurping.php&lt;/a&gt;).  As Brian commented, the media should not just focus on iPods period. USB sticks, CDs, floppies etc pose just as much and the same kind of threat as iPods do. And I believe it&#039;s wrong to promote the &#039;banning of portable devices&#039; as a solutions to this &#039;problem&#039; or a security measure for this threat.That is so counter productive! There are software tools available which can just show you what&#039;s hooked on your network and you can control who has access to what, and who has the rights to read/write to portable devices. Very simple and very effective, without the needs to ban anything really. Have you ever wondered what portable devices are hooked/and have been hooked to the computers on your network? You&#039;d be surprised. One way to find this out is by running this online tool, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.endpointscan&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EndPointScan&lt;/a&gt;. It&#039;s very quick and free to use, good to give you an insight on where your and your network stands with this whole portable storage security issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think publications are focusing on iPods primarily due to recent media news such as the pod slurping issue (<a href="http://www.sharp-ideas.net/pod_slurping.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.sharp-ideas.net/pod_slurping.php</a>).  As Brian commented, the media should not just focus on iPods period. USB sticks, CDs, floppies etc pose just as much and the same kind of threat as iPods do. And I believe it&#8217;s wrong to promote the &#8216;banning of portable devices&#8217; as a solutions to this &#8216;problem&#8217; or a security measure for this threat.That is so counter productive! There are software tools available which can just show you what&#8217;s hooked on your network and you can control who has access to what, and who has the rights to read/write to portable devices. Very simple and very effective, without the needs to ban anything really. Have you ever wondered what portable devices are hooked/and have been hooked to the computers on your network? You&#8217;d be surprised. One way to find this out is by running this online tool, <a href="http://www.endpointscan" rel="nofollow">EndPointScan</a>. It&#8217;s very quick and free to use, good to give you an insight on where your and your network stands with this whole portable storage security issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; NetworkWorld: iPods are ’security threat’</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; NetworkWorld: iPods are ’security threat’]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/11/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Article Link [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Article Link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honza</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Honza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/11/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geez. This is just what we need, another crackdown of our freedoms in the workplace.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I don&#039;t see many companies taking this obvious &#039;scaremongering sales pitch&#039; seriously, but it only takes one knee-jerk reactionary process manager (and we have lots of them here in IBM) to decide that this is a good thing, and we will be banned from even bringing our basic (non-mp3 or flash based) mobile phones into the office.

As for why, Brian, that they chose to focus on the iPod, it&#039;s obvious that it&#039;s because the iPod is the leading market share &#039;mp3 player&#039; and the name &#039;ipod&#039; can be subconsciously applied to ANY music playing or memory capable device. You just watch, we will have to switch back to CD players, and then they&#039;ll probably be banned too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez. This is just what we need, another crackdown of our freedoms in the workplace.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I don&#8217;t see many companies taking this obvious &#8216;scaremongering sales pitch&#8217; seriously, but it only takes one knee-jerk reactionary process manager (and we have lots of them here in IBM) to decide that this is a good thing, and we will be banned from even bringing our basic (non-mp3 or flash based) mobile phones into the office.</p>
<p>As for why, Brian, that they chose to focus on the iPod, it&#8217;s obvious that it&#8217;s because the iPod is the leading market share &#8216;mp3 player&#8217; and the name &#8216;ipod&#8217; can be subconsciously applied to ANY music playing or memory capable device. You just watch, we will have to switch back to CD players, and then they&#8217;ll probably be banned too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/11/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure why they chose to focus on iPods,and not something like usb drives, which are much easier to do malicious things with.

I have heard of companies filing the usb plugs with epoxy to prevent some of these types of things.  I have no idea how widespread this is, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why they chose to focus on iPods,and not something like usb drives, which are much easier to do malicious things with.</p>
<p>I have heard of companies filing the usb plugs with epoxy to prevent some of these types of things.  I have no idea how widespread this is, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/11/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s not forget flash drives and online storage.  While emailing yourself documents could be traceable with a company&#039;s email server or storing files online could show up on the gateway server, flash drives, iPods, and optical media are less traceable.  I guess you better buy their products!

I don&#039;t see Apple banning iPods at work, so I feel I am safe!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget flash drives and online storage.  While emailing yourself documents could be traceable with a company&#8217;s email server or storing files online could show up on the gateway server, flash drives, iPods, and optical media are less traceable.  I guess you better buy their products!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see Apple banning iPods at work, so I feel I am safe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bailie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bailie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/11/networkworld-ipods-are-security-threat/#comment-319956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And while we&#039;re banning iPods et al, lets also equip all companies with the same memory-erasing device they had in Men In Black. Because with the passwords we probably all remember, bringing down the company is just around the corner.

Umm, paranoia anyone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And while we&#8217;re banning iPods et al, lets also equip all companies with the same memory-erasing device they had in Men In Black. Because with the passwords we probably all remember, bringing down the company is just around the corner.</p>
<p>Umm, paranoia anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

