Comments on: Nano Ad Screen Goofs?

By: steph

steph — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:38:15 +0000

well i guess there is two male actors in green, i mean the one with the glasses, that is on the very top of this page.

By: steph

steph — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:36:33 +0000

I want to know who is the male actor in the green outfit?? is his name amani?

By: Neuer Ärger für Apple durch iPod nano Werbung? « Mac » Freak

Neuer Ärger für Apple durch iPod nano Werbung? « Mac » Freak — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:44:35 +0000

[...] [via The Apple Blog] [...]

By: Tanner

Tanner — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:05:14 +0000

I say weldone and good job! I love reading the apple blog and I appreciate all the hard work you guys put into this. I am an apple geek and like “wasting” my time on stuff like this.

By: Matt Rix

Matt Rix — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:40:01 +0000

You’d think with all the complaining you’re doing about the article, you’d actually read the article.

If you had, you would read: “…indicating it was added after the fact, something Apple actually admits in fine print at the end of the spot…”

By: Michial

Michial — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:27:10 +0000

Wow. Being new to Apple I’m shocked at how rude you all are to the poster. Give the guy a break. If you are not interested view the next post. Wow.

By: Vid-Biz: Hulu, Hadopi 2, Insurance

Vid-Biz: Hulu, Hadopi 2, Insurance — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:23:45 +0000

[...] Nano Ad Goofs? Does the new commercial obfuscate the truth about the awkwardly placed camera lens? (The Apple Blog) [...]

By: DB

DB — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:04:33 +0000

i agree, they chose the worst possible placement for the camera.

By: Dan

Dan — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:14:26 +0000

You’d think with all the freeze-framing you guys did, you would have noticed the “screen images simulated” disclaimer.

By: J Davis

J Davis — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:57:50 +0000

+ 1

I can understand a little blurb about this in a forum but a ~2-3 page article with (too many) illustrations for a simple ad? You had way too much time on your hands.

Maybe you could skip over the fine print (“Screen images simulated”) again and make an iPhone version that shows how ridiculously fast the iPhones in the commercials are (“Sequences shortened”).

Maybe even use a millisecond-accuracy stopwatch to bench real world performance of the iPhone vs the ad-iPhone?

By: forbetaorworse

forbetaorworse — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:51:08 +0000

in the commercial it says at the bottom of the screen “screen images simulated”. This is pretty weak guys. I expect better.

By: Josh Pigford

Josh Pigford — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:54:19 +0000

These comments have all spiraled out of control. THE MADNESS!!!! AHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We’re all kindergarteners with too much time on our hands who can’t spell!

/removing tongue from cheek :)

By: Tom

Tom — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:43:32 +0000

is cool that ipod nano can go photo is nice

By: Jay

Jay — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:46:55 +0000

I have to agree that this is not of particular interest in terms of what TheAppleBlog normally puts out. When I saw goofs in the title, I was thinking something like a nip slip or worse! Let’s get back to the point where this ad is simply a representation…

By: Michael

Michael — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:16:04 +0000

And you have no clue how to be polite in the internet so STFU and GTFO.

By: James

James — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:19:11 +0000

In the ad it states that the video on the iPod is simulated.