<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom for OS X &#8211; Courtesy Adobe Labs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Creek</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/#comment-309181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Creek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/09/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/#comment-309181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its small, fast, and doesnt have a button that loads the damn Adobe bridge. I might be wrong but it feels like the work of those Macromedia boys. Anyone else think this feels slightly askew (in a good way) of the Adobe norm?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its small, fast, and doesnt have a button that loads the damn Adobe bridge. I might be wrong but it feels like the work of those Macromedia boys. Anyone else think this feels slightly askew (in a good way) of the Adobe norm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Brown</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/#comment-309180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/09/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/#comment-309180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Reichmann has posted an article, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/software/lightroom1.shtml&quot; title=&quot;First Look and Primer&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Adobe Lightroom First Look and Primer&lt;/a&gt; at his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.luminous-landscape.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Reichmann has posted an article, <a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/software/lightroom1.shtml" title="First Look and Primer" rel="nofollow">Adobe Lightroom First Look and Primer</a> at his <a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com" rel="nofollow">website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Santilli</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/#comment-309179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Santilli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/09/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/#comment-309179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate the insights guys - thanks.

It looks like a pretty nice app so far, from my initial tinkering.  It&#039;s upping my 1.5ghz Powerbook processor a bit....but I&#039;ve got a lot of other stuff running too.

Not bad for a free (for now) beta.  Guess we&#039;ll wait and see what happens with it down the road.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the insights guys &#8211; thanks.</p>
<p>It looks like a pretty nice app so far, from my initial tinkering.  It&#8217;s upping my 1.5ghz Powerbook processor a bit&#8230;.but I&#8217;ve got a lot of other stuff running too.</p>
<p>Not bad for a free (for now) beta.  Guess we&#8217;ll wait and see what happens with it down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jørgen Arnor Gårdsø Lom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/#comment-309178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jørgen Arnor Gårdsø Lom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/09/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/#comment-309178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, I&#039;ve jotted down my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jorgenarnor.com/item/2006/1/9/adobe_lightroom_first_thoughts&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;first thoughts on Lightroom&lt;/a&gt; over at my own blog, and I don&#039;t bother rewriting it all here - but overall; as I&#039;m on a Mac Mini, this is the obvious choice...

It lacks some of Aperture&#039;s sophisticated bells and whistles (I mean that in a nice way... I actually considered buying a G5 quad, just for running Aperture...), but takes it all back in speed...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ve jotted down my <a href="http://www.jorgenarnor.com/item/2006/1/9/adobe_lightroom_first_thoughts" rel="nofollow">first thoughts on Lightroom</a> over at my own blog, and I don&#8217;t bother rewriting it all here &#8211; but overall; as I&#8217;m on a Mac Mini, this is the obvious choice&#8230;</p>
<p>It lacks some of Aperture&#8217;s sophisticated bells and whistles (I mean that in a nice way&#8230; I actually considered buying a G5 quad, just for running Aperture&#8230;), but takes it all back in speed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/#comment-309177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/09/lightroom-for-os-x-courtesy-adobe-labs/#comment-309177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do prefessional photography and when Aperture came out it was a big help to me. I quickly brought it into my workflow and i don&#039;t plan to change anytime soon. I got Lightroom from Adobe and i have to say i will be using it. There are things in both that make them very close to the same but then again there are things that are different.

Conlcusion: Aperture will not leave my workflow when i am home and uploading and editing all of my RAW files. But on the fly lightroom is a quick and easy setup for my on the go Powerbook. Lightroom will quickly become a brother to Aperture in my setup and they will work together
BUT as of now nothing will take the place of Aperture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do prefessional photography and when Aperture came out it was a big help to me. I quickly brought it into my workflow and i don&#8217;t plan to change anytime soon. I got Lightroom from Adobe and i have to say i will be using it. There are things in both that make them very close to the same but then again there are things that are different.</p>
<p>Conlcusion: Aperture will not leave my workflow when i am home and uploading and editing all of my RAW files. But on the fly lightroom is a quick and easy setup for my on the go Powerbook. Lightroom will quickly become a brother to Aperture in my setup and they will work together<br />
BUT as of now nothing will take the place of Aperture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

