<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is iLife 07 not going to happen for reals?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: It’s good to see Apple’s focus on quality in 10.6</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It’s good to see Apple’s focus on quality in 10.6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] excited about than any other iPhone App demo or glanced over news release in the last 48 hours. I wrote peviously how this flurry of new features came at some cost to Apple engineers. I&#8217;ve been in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excited about than any other iPhone App demo or glanced over news release in the last 48 hours. I wrote peviously how this flurry of new features came at some cost to Apple engineers. I&rsquo;ve been in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It’s good to see Apple’s focus on quality in 10.6 &#124; RatZine - Rat stinkin news</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It’s good to see Apple’s focus on quality in 10.6 &#124; RatZine - Rat stinkin news]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] excited about than any other iPhone App demo or glanced over news release in the last 48 hours. I wrote peviously how this flurry of new features came at some cost to Apple engineers. I&#8217;ve been in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excited about than any other iPhone App demo or glanced over news release in the last 48 hours. I wrote peviously how this flurry of new features came at some cost to Apple engineers. I&#8217;ve been in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's good to see Apple's focus on quality in 10.6 &#124; The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It's good to see Apple's focus on quality in 10.6 &#124; The Apple Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] excited about than any other iPhone App demo or glanced over news release in the last 48 hours. I wrote peviously how this flurry of new features came at some cost to Apple engineers. I&#8217;ve been in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excited about than any other iPhone App demo or glanced over news release in the last 48 hours. I wrote peviously how this flurry of new features came at some cost to Apple engineers. I&#8217;ve been in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Blog (dawne mac.chwilami) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Linki z 18.06 (iPhone i inne)</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Blog (dawne mac.chwilami) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Linki z 18.06 (iPhone i inne)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://theappleblog.com/&#8230;/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/ The Apple Blog uważa, że pakiet iLife nie pojawi się do czasu popularyzacji iPhone i/lub wprowadzenia iPodów z dotykowymi wyświetlaczami. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://theappleblog.com/&#8230;/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/" rel="nofollow">http://theappleblog.com/&#8230;/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/</a> The Apple Blog uważa, że pakiet iLife nie pojawi się do czasu popularyzacji iPhone i/lub wprowadzenia iPodów z dotykowymi wyświetlaczami. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[to #5:
I have over 25000 photos in iPhoto on a 2GB RAM 17&quot; Intel iMac.
I could eat less memory (&gt; 800MB RAM allocated) and be faster...

Also an option to delete both from iPhoto and filesystem (with iPhoto NOT managing my files) would be helpfull (currently i wrote my on applescript to do so).

iWeb could incrementally upload the changes in a site... currently ALL files are regenerated uploaded (even in .mac).

iDVD with &quot;free&quot; menues not only templated ones

and so on...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to #5:<br />
I have over 25000 photos in iPhoto on a 2GB RAM 17&#8243; Intel iMac.<br />
I could eat less memory (&gt; 800MB RAM allocated) and be faster&#8230;</p>
<p>Also an option to delete both from iPhoto and filesystem (with iPhoto NOT managing my files) would be helpfull (currently i wrote my on applescript to do so).</p>
<p>iWeb could incrementally upload the changes in a site&#8230; currently ALL files are regenerated uploaded (even in .mac).</p>
<p>iDVD with &#8220;free&#8221; menues not only templated ones</p>
<p>and so on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas040</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thomas040]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the amount of innovation in the ilife suite has come to ceiling prob... I mean.. how much better can iphoto and imovie get... without disturbing its ease of use....?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the amount of innovation in the ilife suite has come to ceiling prob&#8230; I mean.. how much better can iphoto and imovie get&#8230; without disturbing its ease of use&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we should stop calling it iLife 07 and start calling it by its official name: &quot;iLife08&quot;

There is no way the something that will be released anytime after June will get the 07 moniker so it is clear that it will have an 08 after it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should stop calling it iLife 07 and start calling it by its official name: &#8220;iLife08&#8243;</p>
<p>There is no way the something that will be released anytime after June will get the 07 moniker so it is clear that it will have an 08 after it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My guess is all &quot;other&quot; software from Apple is on hold until after release if iPhone and leopard.
I you incorporate features that require leopard (time machine, cover flow and so on) you can&#039;t ship it now - that is what i exspect to happen.

Also a revamped .mac plus a even tighter integration to iWork/iLife maybe a good reason to wait.

The current iLife is good enough to impress anyone out there anyway!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is all &#8220;other&#8221; software from Apple is on hold until after release if iPhone and leopard.<br />
I you incorporate features that require leopard (time machine, cover flow and so on) you can&#8217;t ship it now &#8211; that is what i exspect to happen.</p>
<p>Also a revamped .mac plus a even tighter integration to iWork/iLife maybe a good reason to wait.</p>
<p>The current iLife is good enough to impress anyone out there anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally broke down and bought iWork &#039;06 a month ago, because my daughter really needed it for school.  Considering iWork &#039;08 may not be out until Jan., I don&#039;t feel so bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally broke down and bought iWork &#8217;06 a month ago, because my daughter really needed it for school.  Considering iWork &#8217;08 may not be out until Jan., I don&#8217;t feel so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niclet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niclet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/is-ilife-07-not-going-to-happen-for-reals/#comment-320965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMO, based on the fact that all Apple Software Developers were interrupted to achieve the iPhone and then surely now monopolized on Leopard&#039;s project whose release is scheduled for October, maybe will see the new iWork and iLife bundles release at the next Macworld Expo in january 2008? Probably with full iPhone integration.
{dream zone}-&gt; Hopefully, it will be accompanied with new large touch-screen iPods form factor, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, based on the fact that all Apple Software Developers were interrupted to achieve the iPhone and then surely now monopolized on Leopard&#8217;s project whose release is scheduled for October, maybe will see the new iWork and iLife bundles release at the next Macworld Expo in january 2008? Probably with full iPhone integration.<br />
{dream zone}-&gt; Hopefully, it will be accompanied with new large touch-screen iPods form factor, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

