<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Updates, New iPod nano and New iPod touch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ipod touch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree classics are alot better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree classics are alot better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[which is better and ipod touch for $200 or and ipod video with more gigs for $250]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which is better and ipod touch for $200 or and ipod video with more gigs for $250</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallori</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mallori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallori</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mallori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know like which NEW iPod to get, the new iPod nano, or the new iPod touch??? If you guys could give me some feedback on which one to get that would be great!!! Thank!!! :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know like which NEW iPod to get, the new iPod nano, or the new iPod touch??? If you guys could give me some feedback on which one to get that would be great!!! Thank!!! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallori</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mallori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe if you knew someone that you could contact to tell them that if the could be a way to turn the &quot;shake the iPod if you want it to suffle&quot; when they remodle this iPod nano. They know that people run with iPods a whole bunch. They were probably trying to rip people off by making that feature. If I were you I would try to complain about that to the place you bought it from.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if you knew someone that you could contact to tell them that if the could be a way to turn the &#8220;shake the iPod if you want it to suffle&#8221; when they remodle this iPod nano. They know that people run with iPods a whole bunch. They were probably trying to rip people off by making that feature. If I were you I would try to complain about that to the place you bought it from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They need to come out with a new ipod touch with a camera and video. Then it will be an iphone with out the phone. Then I would definately buy it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to come out with a new ipod touch with a camera and video. Then it will be an iphone with out the phone. Then I would definately buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my ipod refused to be updated, what should i do because i have an updater in my system and itunes music player]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my ipod refused to be updated, what should i do because i have an updater in my system and itunes music player</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libby</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Libby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im getting a new iPod soon and im not sure whether to get the new iPod nano or the touch, i know you said the new iPod is ugly but that doesnt bother me and neither does the shake to change song thing im really confused.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im getting a new iPod soon and im not sure whether to get the new iPod nano or the touch, i know you said the new iPod is ugly but that doesnt bother me and neither does the shake to change song thing im really confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wheeler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool i really want the new ipod nano now or the ipod touch. very well written very convincing!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool i really want the new ipod nano now or the ipod touch. very well written very convincing!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Harris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 01:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i don&#039;t know what they could have put inside the new itouch since the older one has everything in it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know what they could have put inside the new itouch since the older one has everything in it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the shake feature could you not just lock the ipod if you were running.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the shake feature could you not just lock the ipod if you were running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonV</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JonV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fatty nano is much better to handle and pocket away. This tall nano is just another Zune copy. Nothing great to see here and violently shaking my nano to switch songs, no thanks. Stupidest idea, not &#039;funnest&#039;idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fatty nano is much better to handle and pocket away. This tall nano is just another Zune copy. Nothing great to see here and violently shaking my nano to switch songs, no thanks. Stupidest idea, not &#8216;funnest&#8217;idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and @ 2 million&#039;s post;
I would rather have an ipod nano then the classic, because they are easier to hide in class and detention, they are less bulky, and look pretty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and @ 2 million&#8217;s post;<br />
I would rather have an ipod nano then the classic, because they are easier to hide in class and detention, they are less bulky, and look pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate the new ipod nano, but the ipod touch is better than before.
the new nano is uglier, and bigger. the shake to shuffle song would get annoying, because I run with it, and I don&#039;t want my songs to be changing every two seconds.
the genius feature is okay, but I&#039;d rather have the old ipod nano back. They should tell all ipod nanos, every generation, instead of these fugly ones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the new ipod nano, but the ipod touch is better than before.<br />
the new nano is uglier, and bigger. the shake to shuffle song would get annoying, because I run with it, and I don&#8217;t want my songs to be changing every two seconds.<br />
the genius feature is okay, but I&#8217;d rather have the old ipod nano back. They should tell all ipod nanos, every generation, instead of these fugly ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ferri</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/ipod-updates-new-ipod-nano-and-new-ipod-touch/#comment-331870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ferri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4487#comment-331870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see Joe&#039;s point... but calling it extortion is a bit harsh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Joe&#8217;s point&#8230; but calling it extortion is a bit harsh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

