Comments on: “iPhone” Troubles: Cisco is Suing

By: john

john — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:34:07 +0000

I think they will work things out. I mean the VOIP option on the phone is a fantastic tool. http://nationwide-dsl.com

By: Cisco sues Apple over iPhone trademark

Cisco sues Apple over iPhone trademark — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 12:53:47 +0000

[...] Update: Here is the text of Cisco’s press release on the suit. Tip o’ the hat to The Apple Blog. [...]

By: apple » Blog Archive » Cisco sues Apple over iPhone trademark

apple » Blog Archive » Cisco sues Apple over iPhone trademark — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:49:14 +0000

[...] Update: Here is the text of Cisco’s press release on the suit. Tip o’ the hat to The Apple Blog. [...]

By: vic

vic — Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:39:36 +0000

Apparently things have been worked out between the Cisco and Apple. They're going to just work on getting their products more compatible with each other. I wonder if the lawsuit was even a real one to begin with. It's not like Cisco was even suing for money. Guess this is what they wanted initially. Check out my blog for a preview of the iPhone features

By: Steve Cannon

Steve Cannon — Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:26:14 +0000

Some of you guys are unbelievable!! Apple is Litigation-Larry when it comes to anyone even coming close to their “Names” and such. There are numerous cases where Apple made people give up their domain names and close sites down and most recently they have been attacking bloggers who talk about the PocketPC mod to make Windows Mobile 5 look like iPhone BUT when someone comes after them to give them a taste of their own medicine, you Steve Jobs lemmings make comments like “It is a shame” and “I can’t believe that Cisco is being so juvenile about the whole thing”. I like Apple and Steve Jobs is cool but hypocrisy Sucks!!

By: Steve Chaarnovitz

Steve Chaarnovitz — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:25:30 +0000

Why not call it the WebPod or the PodPhone.

By: Erik

Erik — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:09:51 +0000

Also, from what I understand, there could be an issue of Abandonment. The fact that Cisco did not have a product for a period of years after the trademark was issued. Not being a lawyer, I have no clue as to the merit but it has been discussed on a number of lawyer blogs. Should be interesting. Hell, who knows, maybe could be ‘creative’ly bought off for 100 million?

By: JC

JC — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:09:46 +0000

Should have named it the pPod, or even better, the iQphone including qode®…www.qode.com

By: vanni

vanni — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:46:08 +0000

and this is very interesting:The application to bag the word “IPHONE” was lodged by Apple Computer Inc on October 17, 2002 – a year after the first iPod rolled off its Chinese production line.” Did Cisco buy infogear infogear in 2002?

By: vanni

vanni — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:26:58 +0000

followup! iphone.org > apple. iphone.net > ???
i think this is going to be interesting. Cisco may not have what they think they have.