<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 3.0 Brings Tethering to 20+ Carriers&#8230;Except AT&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:14:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;At&amp;T has for the last time hooked me into thinking that they give a shit. They are a company that relies on excuses. From the moment they took over Airtouch Cellular they had an excuse for everything from bad coverage to excessive billing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is a sad reminder that they would hold off tethering capabilities in the US for no other reason than a justification of charging more than other carriers for the same product.
GREEDY BASTARDS!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At&amp;T has for the last time hooked me into thinking that they give a shit. They are a company that relies on excuses. From the moment they took over Airtouch Cellular they had an excuse for everything from bad coverage to excessive billing.</p>
<p>It is a sad reminder that they would hold off tethering capabilities in the US for no other reason than a justification of charging more than other carriers for the same product.<br />
GREEDY BASTARDS!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will AT&#38;T Fence in the New iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will AT&#38;T Fence in the New iPhone?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] The carrier currently offers video services on its phones, but only for one-way video and at a cost of up to $9.99 per month. If Apple&#8217;s front-facing camera is meant for two-way video conversation, AT&amp;T will need to create a new offering. And it remains to be seen if AT&amp;T customers will pay for another add-on service. Also possible is a lack of initial support for the camera; after all, AT&amp;T has yet to offer the iPhone tethering feature that arrived in the last major software iteration. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The carrier currently offers video services on its phones, but only for one-way video and at a cost of up to $9.99 per month. If Apple&#8217;s front-facing camera is meant for two-way video conversation, AT&amp;T will need to create a new offering. And it remains to be seen if AT&amp;T customers will pay for another add-on service. Also possible is a lack of initial support for the camera; after all, AT&amp;T has yet to offer the iPhone tethering feature that arrived in the last major software iteration. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[m]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might want to read the terms &amp; conditions of your plan.  The $15 is for unlimited data access ONLY on your phone.  The T&amp;C specifically states that it does not include tethering.  AT&amp;T can charge you as if you are on a much more expensive LaptopConnect plan if it &quot;catches&quot; you tethering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to read the terms &amp; conditions of your plan.  The $15 is for unlimited data access ONLY on your phone.  The T&amp;C specifically states that it does not include tethering.  AT&amp;T can charge you as if you are on a much more expensive LaptopConnect plan if it &#8220;catches&#8221; you tethering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tam kontor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tam kontor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very nice... thanks....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice&#8230; thanks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Tasarım - Grafik Tasarım</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Tasarım - Grafik Tasarım]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks this info..

Your web site full professional...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks this info..</p>
<p>Your web site full professional&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taeo Cullen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taeo Cullen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hate to break it to all you poor US citizens but Australia has 5 iPhone Apple authorized phone carriers Optus(Singtel), Telstra(Government Carrier), Vodaphone, 3ThreeNetwork and VirginMobile 

Apple was in exclusive talks with 1 carrier before iphone 3g launch but was forced to consider other carriers after the Australian Competition &amp; Consumer Commission (ACCC)gov body responsible for company policing informed them it is illegal under anticompetitive laws to force consumers to only one carrier although carriers are aloud to lock the phones to their networks they must allow customers to be able to unlock the phones at a cost or 6months from activation at no cost

Use your power to convince your gov to make them let you choose your carrier its wrong!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to break it to all you poor US citizens but Australia has 5 iPhone Apple authorized phone carriers Optus(Singtel), Telstra(Government Carrier), Vodaphone, 3ThreeNetwork and VirginMobile </p>
<p>Apple was in exclusive talks with 1 carrier before iphone 3g launch but was forced to consider other carriers after the Australian Competition &amp; Consumer Commission (ACCC)gov body responsible for company policing informed them it is illegal under anticompetitive laws to force consumers to only one carrier although carriers are aloud to lock the phones to their networks they must allow customers to be able to unlock the phones at a cost or 6months from activation at no cost</p>
<p>Use your power to convince your gov to make them let you choose your carrier its wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johns Does</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johns Does]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&amp;T can take their agreement with Apple and shove it up there ass!

Go to Verizon, cheaper, and proven better!

Does anyone remember that US Govt had to break up ATT once already!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T can take their agreement with Apple and shove it up there ass!</p>
<p>Go to Verizon, cheaper, and proven better!</p>
<p>Does anyone remember that US Govt had to break up ATT once already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kontör</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kontör]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At+t I assure you that you will lose MOST IF NOT ALL Apple-Iphone customers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At+t I assure you that you will lose MOST IF NOT ALL Apple-Iphone customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vodafone sanal kontör</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vodafone sanal kontör]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I assure you that you will lose MOST IF NOT ALL Apple-Iphone customers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assure you that you will lose MOST IF NOT ALL Apple-Iphone customers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geneinla</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geneinla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are &quot;hacks&quot; that enable this (not so) hidden feature with iPhone 3.0. I have my iPhone peers already using it. If they use it for emergencies - out in the desert to access email, wiki rattle snake bite they just had. Probably less then 3G traffic per month - will ATT find out that these data usage were tethered - if so how..?? 

I suspect that the flags go up when there are excessive data usage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are &#8220;hacks&#8221; that enable this (not so) hidden feature with iPhone 3.0. I have my iPhone peers already using it. If they use it for emergencies &#8211; out in the desert to access email, wiki rattle snake bite they just had. Probably less then 3G traffic per month &#8211; will ATT find out that these data usage were tethered &#8211; if so how..?? </p>
<p>I suspect that the flags go up when there are excessive data usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Thom White</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris Thom White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not making excuses for AT&amp;T, but I think the issue basically is that ATT is worried that everyone will start using tons of data and bring down their network. The other companies that currently allow tethering also don&#039;t do unlimited data. Rogers for example, has plans from 1G to 6G of data, but no unlimited.

AT&amp;T is &quot;unlimited&quot; data in the states, but that&#039;s tempered by the fact that you&#039;re not using your iphone to download data 24 hours a day. It&#039;s just like your POTS telephone in the old days - in theory it was unlimited, make as many calls as you wanted, but realistically maybe you made a few phone calls a day, so you weren&#039;t on it 24 hours a day. (When dial-up internet came along and people really WERE on it 24 hours a day, they had major problems if anyone remembers that long ago.)

SO ... AT&amp;T knows you&#039;re not really using your iPhone for data all that much. If you check your usage, you&#039;re probably not any greater than 1 Gig/month for the average person. But let&#039;s say someone turns on tethering, and ditches their home DSL line.. just hooks up their computer to their cell phone. So now you really are using the cell network constantly for data access. And then everyone does that. Why pay for a home DSL line at all if you&#039;re a single person? Just keep it attached to your cell phone, it&#039;s &quot;unlimited&quot;, right? Well, then we have the same issue as the dial-up days.

AT&amp;T&#039;s in a bind. If they go back and say &quot;no, it&#039;s not really unlimited&quot;, they&#039;re in violation of the agreement they sold you. They can&#039;t really separate out tethering traffic from regular iphone traffic, it looks the same to the data network (unless Apple agrees to a software upgrade that does distinguish the two.) So they shut it off until their lawyers and their engineers can figure out what the hell to do. It sucks, but this is what&#039;s going on behind the scenes, I guarantee you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not making excuses for AT&amp;T, but I think the issue basically is that ATT is worried that everyone will start using tons of data and bring down their network. The other companies that currently allow tethering also don&#8217;t do unlimited data. Rogers for example, has plans from 1G to 6G of data, but no unlimited.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T is &#8220;unlimited&#8221; data in the states, but that&#8217;s tempered by the fact that you&#8217;re not using your iphone to download data 24 hours a day. It&#8217;s just like your POTS telephone in the old days &#8211; in theory it was unlimited, make as many calls as you wanted, but realistically maybe you made a few phone calls a day, so you weren&#8217;t on it 24 hours a day. (When dial-up internet came along and people really WERE on it 24 hours a day, they had major problems if anyone remembers that long ago.)</p>
<p>SO &#8230; AT&amp;T knows you&#8217;re not really using your iPhone for data all that much. If you check your usage, you&#8217;re probably not any greater than 1 Gig/month for the average person. But let&#8217;s say someone turns on tethering, and ditches their home DSL line.. just hooks up their computer to their cell phone. So now you really are using the cell network constantly for data access. And then everyone does that. Why pay for a home DSL line at all if you&#8217;re a single person? Just keep it attached to your cell phone, it&#8217;s &#8220;unlimited&#8221;, right? Well, then we have the same issue as the dial-up days.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s in a bind. If they go back and say &#8220;no, it&#8217;s not really unlimited&#8221;, they&#8217;re in violation of the agreement they sold you. They can&#8217;t really separate out tethering traffic from regular iphone traffic, it looks the same to the data network (unless Apple agrees to a software upgrade that does distinguish the two.) So they shut it off until their lawyers and their engineers can figure out what the hell to do. It sucks, but this is what&#8217;s going on behind the scenes, I guarantee you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been on At&amp;t for around 2 years and my dad&#039;s the one that has the iPhone, but I&#039;m using it more than he does. It&#039;s the phone that does almost ANYTHING, has apps as stupid as iBeer, iText, has games like Tap Tap Revenge and Line Rider iRide, yet Apple and At&amp;t won&#039;t bless us with internet tethering? Apple, you need to realize that the only reason iPhone isn&#039;t down the drain right now is because At&amp;t customers bought it, thinking it was God or something, and now they&#039;re stuck with a device they hate with 1+ years remaining on their contract. If Verizon (which I WILL be switching to, as soon as my contract is up in 2010), T-Mobile, or Sprint somehow released the long-time rumored &#039;iPhone killer&#039;, they&#039;d better expect big money, because I&#039;m sure most, maybe all of At&amp;t&#039;s trapped iPhone customers waiting at their stores in about a year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been on At&amp;t for around 2 years and my dad&#8217;s the one that has the iPhone, but I&#8217;m using it more than he does. It&#8217;s the phone that does almost ANYTHING, has apps as stupid as iBeer, iText, has games like Tap Tap Revenge and Line Rider iRide, yet Apple and At&amp;t won&#8217;t bless us with internet tethering? Apple, you need to realize that the only reason iPhone isn&#8217;t down the drain right now is because At&amp;t customers bought it, thinking it was God or something, and now they&#8217;re stuck with a device they hate with 1+ years remaining on their contract. If Verizon (which I WILL be switching to, as soon as my contract is up in 2010), T-Mobile, or Sprint somehow released the long-time rumored &#8216;iPhone killer&#8217;, they&#8217;d better expect big money, because I&#8217;m sure most, maybe all of At&amp;t&#8217;s trapped iPhone customers waiting at their stores in about a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bikeman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bikeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just jailbreak and use the program PdaNet for Iphone, Done. works really well via usb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just jailbreak and use the program PdaNet for Iphone, Done. works really well via usb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ale</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[to all verizon, sprint, t-mobile, etc. executives... If you get apple to do business with you... $$$$.... 

At+t I assure you that you will lose MOST IF  NOT ALL Apple-Iphone customers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to all verizon, sprint, t-mobile, etc. executives&#8230; If you get apple to do business with you&#8230; $$$$&#8230;. </p>
<p>At+t I assure you that you will lose MOST IF  NOT ALL Apple-Iphone customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just purchased a iphonme 3g today and the salesman in thee att store,toldd me tethering awas avaiable.......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just purchased a iphonme 3g today and the salesman in thee att store,toldd me tethering awas avaiable&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/iphone-3-0-brings-tethering-to-20-carriers-except-att/#comment-347771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=25571#comment-347771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, what you have to realize though is that Apple is getting mega bucks off of the exclusive that they won&#039;t get with the iPhone being available on any network.  I hate it just as much as you that I cannot have a great device that uses its full and current (on Friday) functionality.  This is how capitalism works and the AT&amp;T probably just isn&#039;t ready for the overload on it&#039;s already strained network.  

If Apple knew what was good for it as far as customer service goes and reputation they&#039;d get some balls and revise the contract with AT&amp;T to bind them to increasing the network on an expedited timetable and immediate availability for customers to use the iPhone with the full functionality it&#039;s capable of.

I&#039;m on Verizon.  I&#039;ve got a 20% discount via my alma mater and customer service is fabulous.  The iPhone is calling my name but as long as AT&amp;T doesn&#039;t offer tethering, there&#039;s no financial incentive for me to pay for a more expensive basic contract with AT&amp;Crap ($8 more/month) and the data plan.  That&#039;s a whopping $912 more than what I currently pay for a 2 year contract!  I need it to cover my internet at home it make it worth it.  I&#039;d rather get a new MacBook every 2 years for that type of savings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, what you have to realize though is that Apple is getting mega bucks off of the exclusive that they won&#8217;t get with the iPhone being available on any network.  I hate it just as much as you that I cannot have a great device that uses its full and current (on Friday) functionality.  This is how capitalism works and the AT&amp;T probably just isn&#8217;t ready for the overload on it&#8217;s already strained network.  </p>
<p>If Apple knew what was good for it as far as customer service goes and reputation they&#8217;d get some balls and revise the contract with AT&amp;T to bind them to increasing the network on an expedited timetable and immediate availability for customers to use the iPhone with the full functionality it&#8217;s capable of.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m on Verizon.  I&#8217;ve got a 20% discount via my alma mater and customer service is fabulous.  The iPhone is calling my name but as long as AT&amp;T doesn&#8217;t offer tethering, there&#8217;s no financial incentive for me to pay for a more expensive basic contract with AT&amp;Crap ($8 more/month) and the data plan.  That&#8217;s a whopping $912 more than what I currently pay for a 2 year contract!  I need it to cover my internet at home it make it worth it.  I&#8217;d rather get a new MacBook every 2 years for that type of savings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

