iPad: The Microwave Oven That Can’t Pop Corn
There’s a backlash in the tech community against Apple’s iPad. Perhaps because the geeks and tech-heads are disappointed the iPad didn’t meet their every expectation. I wonder though if it isn’t just the result of a lack of imagination.
Techies moan endlessly about the iPad’s lack of a physical keyboard and how “no one can do real work on that.” I have to wonder what they mean when they say “real work?” Are they suggesting, for example, all computer users regularly commit themselves to Jessica Fletcher-esque writing marathons? Do the vast majority of us really write 10,000 word screeds every week? Of course not. Most everyday computing consists of a few minutes of light email and web surfing. If a 10,000 word essay is the goal, the iPad might not be the ideal platform (though I suspect we’ll see plenty of people doing very lengthy prose with the optional keyboard). However – not being ideal out-of-the-box for essay writing doesn’t invalidate the utility of the iPad. There are a great many other complaints about the iPad, and they all end this same way.
To those techies fond of finding fault with the iPad, I say this; the iPad is not for you. Instead, the iPad is designed for everyone else in the world, the colossal majority of non-techy folk who simply don’t care about cameras, physical keyboards or “closed” operating systems.
Imagine this scenario;
Meet Carol, a busy wife and mother. She just saw her eldest two kids off to bed and the baby is (finally!) asleep in her arms. This is a rare moment of blissful peace and quiet. Carol settles on the couch, baby in arms, and watches those episodes of Modern Family that have been sitting on the Tivo for three weeks. She giggles as Manny and Gloria bully Jay, and then suddenly remembers she must e-mail Mom about the kids’ soccer game this weekend.
A geek would put the baby aside, deploy the dedicated laptop table and boot-up their 17” unibody MacBook Pro. Carol is no geek. She has precisely zero passion for, or interest in, computers. And she definitely doesn’t have the free arm for laptop-deployment strategies.
Here, the iPad shines. Carol checks the baby is comfortable (yep, still sleeping!) and then with a single button-press the iPad is ready to go. She composes a new e-mail to Mom, pausing for a moment to chuckle at the TV (Cameron is flaming). While it’s on her mind, she adds a note to the family’s shared calendar.
The commercials are on, and while she’d normally skip through them, she takes advantage of those three minutes to follow the link cousin Linda sent a few days ago. It’s a photo gallery of her summer vacation. The iPad’s form factor makes it the ideal tool for this, it’s like she’s holding each photo in her hand. There’s even a short video, too, which reminds Carol she really should use her own camera more often…
The commercials are finished. Carol is done with her ‘computer’. At this point a geek would continue surfing (probably checking RSS feeds or leaving withering comments at the end of another infuriating diatribe from Liam “Doesn’t know what he’s talking about” Cassidy) …but not Carol. She switches it off, tosses it onto the nearest chair and forgets about it.
Carol, by the way, is exactly like all the other non-techy people in the world who could benefit enormously from the ease and simplicity baked into the iPad. The “computer as an appliance” solution is, for non-geeks everywhere, a welcome respite from the inherent complexities of more conventional computers.
Careless and Lazy
Tech-heads argue, “We do all those things with our laptops and smartphones already, so the iPad has no utility and is stupid, dumb and pointless and bah! to Apple and their overpriced toys!” Well, maybe so, but a smartphone is often too small and fiddly (particularly for those of us who are getting a bit long in the tooth), while a laptop is almost always overkill for common light tasks. (I haven’t forgotten the netbook; it remains, in my opinion, an exercise in compromise and frustration for anyone but the most patient geek or undemanding road-warrior.)
This backlash often accompanies new appliances. Consider the humble Microwave Oven; when it first appeared it was expensive and, for a great many people, seemingly-pointless; “But, we already have a real oven. Can a microwave oven brown? Can it roast? Can it grill? Can it warm plates and roast a turkey and heat my coffee at the same time? It can’t do even half the things my real oven does. It’s overpriced and unnecessary and I don’t need one. And no one else will, either.”
If you ask me, that’s a pretty careless – even lazy – conclusion. Yet, it’s precisely the same argument I’ve seen repeated in comments and articles all over the web.
Of course, the microwave oven isn’t criticized today because its utility has been proven. Indoor plumbing, gas central heating, automobiles and even the personal computer all were criticized for being unnecessary and, as the tired old phrase goes, ‘a solution in search of a problem’. Nor has the microwave oven replaced conventional ovens. In fact, most of us have both appliances in the same room of the house. Having one does not automatically relegate the other into obsolescence. They each have their place, and they each offer their own utility and value in a modern home.
And so it will be with the iPad. Only, you won’t be able to pop corn in it.
Related GigaOM Pro Research:
So how is it Carol is able to use the iPad with the baby in her arms but not a laptop?
Why would Carol watch a movie stored on Tivo on the iPad or the MacBook?
Can’t she afford a TV. Do people actually watch TV and movies on laptops? (just because they can?) In the real world away from geek-land we watch TV on the TV. How silly is that!
As a mother who has had babies asleep numerous time in my arms, I became very adept holding a paperback book in the hand wrapped around the baby. I would turn pages with the free hand and put the book down when needing to deal with the baby or another child.
I could do this with a heavier hardback book but it was definitely more awkward, if the book was much heavier or more bulky then it could not be done with one hand.
So could I see an iPad being used in the same situation? Yes. A laptop or even a lighter netbook? No.
@eagle61
no you idiot. Carol is watching her tivo on the tv. Then, while the adverts are playing on the tv, she uses the ipad for the internet
@ben
Sorry for being an idiot but we don’t have this Tivo crap in the UK. Does it run on Windows or OSX?
@eagle61 – the TiVo is a DVR set-top box for the TV, ala the Sky+ box in the UK
Can you hold a laptop with one hand?? Extend at arms length?
Tivo is a TV set top box. It doesn’t work with a Mac or a PC.
A Laptop you have to open (perhaps wait for it to boot up, then enter a password). You have to use a trackpad to launch a browser or mail application. iPad is much more finger friendly — it’s actually designed for use with one hand.It would require much fewer steps to access email on iPad, plus it is much more likely to be within reach of the typical busy mom (on the kitchen counter or coffee table).
The author of this article is spot on — laptops are overkill for most common, light tasks.
Well said Liam. Well said.
There’s also a few other things I’m not so comfortable with here… You could get a laptop at a MUCH cheaper price than an iPad and, given that you could use a laptop in any situation that you could use an iPad for (while the same cannot be said of using an iPad for everything we would use a laptop for), it seems ridiculous to even consider buying an iPad. How is a laptop “overkill”? The features of a laptop needn’t be used at the same time or to their fullest extent, but they’re there for when you MAY need them.
I also doubt anyone that isn’t a “geek” would fork out for a gadget such as the iPad… surely a normal person would just spend the least they could for the basics they need it for?
Of all the things you could argue agains the iPad on, price is probably the most ridiculous.
To say that you could get a laptop at a “MUCH” cheaper price than an iPad is sensationalist at best. As if a sub-$500 laptop is even remotely similar in terms of quality.
Sure, a normal person would spend the least they could for the basics they need. And for most normal people, the ‘basics’ are web, email, reading, entertainment, maybe photos. For all of these, the iPad may well be a better basic solution than a $500 laptop.
Your argument that “The features of a laptop needn’t be used at the same time or to their fullest extent, but they’re there for when you MAY need them” can be extended. My desktop or 27″ iMac does more than I would use a laptop for, so why don’t I just drag it around in a road case for times when I need the extra capabilities?
This is where Liam’s microwave comment is spot on. The six-burner dual-oven range does not trump the microwave because they’re two very different products.
The iPad likewise will succeed to the extent that people understand it is its own product – neither a smartphone nor a laptop. I may already own both the latter, so my buying decision is not whether $500 is better spent on an iPad versus a laptop; I’ll need to decide if the iPad on its own merits offers something that is worth $500 to me. Given my interest in blogging and hyper-local journalism, the iPad may be exactly the tool I’ve been looking for.
There’s an addage in the photography community that the best camera in the world is the one you have with you. My iPhone is always with me but it’s not the best device for manipulating content. If the iPad is indispensible and convenient enough that it’s always with me, then it is a better device than either a laptop or netbook that I may sometimes choose to leave at home.
@Josh Pigford
“To say that you could get a laptop at a “MUCH” cheaper price than an iPad is sensationalist at best.”
No, it is simply true. Don’t know about you over there but here in Italy in brick and mortar stores, with offers and rebates, you ca find netbooks starting from a bit more than 150€; 15.4″ notebooks from a little less than 300€. (Don’t expect the iPad to be priced ay less than 499€ down here).
That’s a MUCH cheaper price.
Then the argument doesn’t hold water and the comparision is stretched, ok, but that’s another story.
And don’t get mad about that, because when those people will “get” the tablet form factor, they’ll simply start posting that you can get a MUCH cheaper Android tablet with a lot more ports ;^D
@Hmmm… Did you even read the article. If so, your comprehension of the English language is sadly lacking as Liam’s points EXACTLY cover your arguments. Go back and read it again. IT’S NOT A COMPUTER SUBSTITUTE! Jeez…
@sky
I am with you on this, the iPad is meant to compliment both a laptop/desktop and a smartphone not replace them. people just cannot seem to grasp the concept.
Personally I am looking forward to it for school most of all. It is so hard to understand why people cannot grasp the concept of “compliment over replacement.”
Alex~
Well said, Liam.
The iPad looks like it’s going to appeal to a hugely wide audience. I’ll take light weight and portability for presentations thank you, while my elder sister will happily chop in her MacBook for one, as the spec matches her daily usage almost exactly – she doesn’t need or want the added computing power of a full-on laptop.
As for the software keyboard, the naysayers said that about the iPhone – yet it’s the first mob I can be bothered to text on. So there!
Nice analogy! To me the one great thing the iPad does is changing the way you’ll experience websites. You can now hold a web page in your hand. I didn’t understand why you would need a touch screen until after using an iPhone I absentmindedly tried to tap on my macbook screen. As with everything Apple does the iPad makes doing stuff more intuitive. It simply seems to be how you want to surf, by touching navigation elements with your fingers.
I can’t wait to try one out. But that’s just me, I wanted to get a microwave oven the minute I saw one in use.
I can’t wait to try the iWork apps. Laying out presentations and one-sheets on a virtual light table sems so much more appealing than via the old keyboard+mouse. Wacom built a business on this, and their Cyntiq 12″ Pen Display by itself costs about $1000. With the right applications, the iPad is looking like a relative bargain.
Good point that most aren’t getting.
a) having the web page in your hand is cool
b) and this is a HUGE plus for me — I’m sick of using a “mouse” when not at a desk. I find the laptop mouse and trackpads too slow — this eliminates that — it’s on desk, or on my lap and I just touch and go.
Voila.
c) as mentioned — the stove/microwave analogy sums it up perfectly.
Liam, I totally echo your sentiments. As a self-confessed member of the geekerati, the iPad was initially a very disappointing anti-climax. However, after sleeping on it and chewing it over for a while, it started to dawn on me just how significant this device really is.
I know the typical example is the Luddite Mom, but my dear mother actually TRIES to better understand the family PC – she’s taking a course in Office and it’s quite saddening to see how she struggles every single day to cope with the inherent complexities of the applications and operating system that I barely give a second thought to.
All she uses the computer for is surfing, email, occasional IM and writing the odd letter in Word. She doesn’t use a web-cam, probably wouldn’t understand the concept of a “closed” operating system even if I explained it to her and is far less capable of (digital) multi-tasking than the PC is. So is a laptop overkill? Well, yes – because she has to learn, understand and memorise skills and routines that are far more taxing that should be required for the fundamentally simple tasks she wishes to execute.
Would she fork out for an iPad? I don’t know for sure, but I’m betting 500 bucks that she’s going to love it.
“Would she fork out for an iPad? I don’t know for sure, but I’m betting 500 bucks that she’s going to love it.”
You’re wonderful =]:
It’s good to see that some in the tech community are understanding what the iPad is for. It’s a consumption device, on a scale that works for all of the media we use today.
Overall I agree with your assessment here that the ipad is a niche device. Unfortunately I was disappointed by the ipad because it has no place in my typical computer usage.
I bought a netbook a month ago and everything people say the ipad is for a netbook does just as well. Sure maybe without the touch screen it is not as “fun”, but then again I use laptops mainly for work so I need a keyboard. It is interesting to see that for almost $200 less you can get a netbook with better battery life than an ipad, larger screen, full functioning OS, more storage etc. and weighing only a little more than a pound more.
Only time will tell how the ipad and the other tablets coming out this year compete with netbooks when it comes to sales and adoption.
This is a good point. I’m on my computer in my home office, then into the car, then on a computer all day at work. The only scenario (currently) I can imagine enjoying the iPad is if it’s right near me in the family room and I want to check email without running to the home office. I don’t use my iphone for email because there’s just too much of it. I also can imagine it by the bedside table….either reading a real book, or an ebook.
Techies seem to have missed that the iPad’s primary and powerful characteristic is sheer intuitive fun. That generally sells in large numbers.
Full ACK. Very good & important point!!
People don’t want to have hassle with installing stuff and keeping virus definitions uptodate etc etc.
They just wanna USE the device – and have FUN.
I wouldn’t say there is exactly a ‘backlash’ against the device. I would term it a ‘luke-warm curiosity’. I think a lot of geeks will end up getting this device, especially with all the amazing 3rd party apps we will see.
@Shannon:
“I think a lot of geeks will end up getting this device, especially with all the amazing 3rd party apps we will see”
Actually, I can see geeks getting it for a different reason. I’m predicting that this will be the first Apple device being bought SPECIFICALLY to have Linux installed on it. A 1 Ghz dual core ARM processor should be fine for Linux and this would be a nice little Linux system for people who go for that.
Of course, I expect that it will sell millions of units and the ‘buy it to install Linux’ will only be a very tiny number, but I think it will happen enough to get some notice.
@joe anonymous
are you serious? linux? why? why would you buy an ipad and put linux on it?
Im not saying its not possible (despite having read, seen, or heard nothing about the possibilities/desires/demand for it) but why?
I’m not saying that _I_ would put Linux on an iPad, but I believe it will be attractive to people who like that sort of thing. Heck, there were people who put Linux on an iPod, for pete’s sake.
From a purely hardware perspective, it’s a nice device. There’s quiet a bit of computing power and features in a relatively small, inexpensive, high quality device.
As I said – it won’t be millions, but I expect the Linux community will find it to be a nice device.
How about a few other examples:
1. My sales people do a lot of presentations at trade shows. Doing so with a conventional laptop is extremely difficult. With the iPad, you just stand next to the customer and show them the presentation.
2. I travel a lot and never even take my laptop out when sitting on a plane – it’s too big to work on the seatback and even if I had a small laptop, it’s hard to get a reasonable viewing angle – particularly if the person in front of you leans back.
3. My mother can’t manage to keep track of photos on her computer. It’s just too much for her. She’d be able to handle the iPod, though.
4. I would like to have access to all of my files and data with me when I travel, but I don’t want the weight of a laptop powerful enough to do that. Or perhaps I need to run a CPU-intensive program and, again, don’t want to carry a heavy computer to get the power I need. With Go to my PC or any of the other equivalent programs, ALL of my data and computing work can be done on one computer no matter where I am. None of the mess of synchronizing (although Mobile Me does a pretty good job, there are still times when things can get out of sync).
5. I’m a doctor and want a simple portable pad to take patient notes and review files. If properly set up with Citrix or whatever the office uses, the iPad provides incredible access to data.
6. I’m a survey-taker in the mall. I could carry a paper clipboard for my survey, or walk the customer over to a fixed computer, or try to hold a conventional laptop in my hand – or use an iPad which is far superior to any of those options.
7. I’m a car salesman. Instead of having to take the customer to my office or a fixed computer kiosk, I carry my iPad and can show them all the options and features while standing next to them.
There are an infinite number of applications. The ‘no one will ever buy an iPad’ group are simply suffering from lack of creativity. Consider the fact that the few countries that offered preorders have apparently stopped the orders because they’ve already exceeded expected supply.
I hope for your mom’s sake that Apple comes up with an app that lets you transfer your photos to the iPad from the camera. Maybe it could be included with the USB attachment that costs extra.
“I hope for your mom’s sake that Apple comes up with an app that lets you transfer your photos to the iPad from the camera.”
Except my mother doesn’t use a digital camera. She’ll get her photos by email. Double click on the photo and it asks if you want to save it to iPhoto. Click on yes, and it’s there.
“I hope for your mom’s sake that Apple comes up with an app that lets you transfer your photos to the iPad from the camera.”
you mean like the ‘iPad Camera Connection Kit’? http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/ (bottom of page)
I could see that maybe Mac is forseeing the “cloud” to house all our files anyways. So wirelessly upload the files from the camera to the cloud, and view them on the iPad. — probably where the future is going anyways.
Laptop table for my 17″ MacBook Pro? The most popular MBP, the 13″, fits nicely in the lap, leaving that hand free to type — which I’m doing now, just to be a smart-ass to prove a point.
There is a big difference between imagining possible uses versus putting your money on the table. I now consult for companies and a user as well. The tablet has had considerable resistance and that will not change because it has an Apple logo. I can look at all the above cited application and would advise most applications can be best satisfied by other devices. On a plane I want my netbook, tilt the screen for privacy, type and see what I am typing comfortably. Hospital setting, dictate notes and keyboards are at almost every station with scanners for issuing meds. Car salesman, you want your customers at your desk to close the deal. Large Tablets are a hard sell and apple should have considered a smaller form factor. Oh by the way the price point is higher and its integration with Enterprise systems non trivial.
It will be interesting to look back a year from now when the story will be tablets fail to gain wide users acceptance.
“On a plane I want my netbook, tilt the screen for privacy, type and see what I am typing comfortably.”
That’s actually interesting; you’ve cited one reason why inferior off-axis viewing may be an advantage.
“Hospital setting… Car salesman… etc.”
I expect that the iPad or any truly revolutionary device will begin to re-design the work. The iPad may appear incompatible at first but this could very quickly change and leave more people wandering why they ever did things the old way. I agree with you it will be interesting to look back a year from now, but I’m not so quick to predict failure of the product. This is based on my opinion that the iPad is not a tablet and therefore can’t be judged on the same merits.
I have this image of kicking back on the couch to flick through some websites that I tagged previously when I didn’t have the time to read them in depth, maybe check out my twitter feeds and browse the latest news. Or maybe I’ll read my latest e-book or read through the PDF manual that I’ve had for ages but just haven’t bothered reading on the laptop sitting at a desk. Maybe I just want some info fed to me so I watch some podcasts or pull some recorded video off my HTPC. Oh yeah, it’s time to call my mom overseas and have a quick chat with her, pass the iPad over to the kids and let her chat with them and see them on the video… oh wait there is no video camera. Can’t do that part of my digital life.
Look, most of the time I’m not going to use a camera for the things I want to do on a day to day basis, but to me skype chat with video is at least a weekly ritual in our house and really is part of what I’d consider a modern digital life experience and I’d love to be able to do that from the iPad.
A camera seems like such an itty bitty little thing to leave out. It’s not like it’d be expensive or that the technology is too cutting edge, it’s just that Apple figure they can sell a whole bunch more of iPad2 if they leave out bits from the first version. Many things I can live without or I reckon they’ll be software updates (eg. multitasking) if Apple decide to open up a bit, but hardware things are fixed. If you shell out money for an iPad the hardware you get for your $ is what you are stuck with for at least some time (if you want to get your money’s worth of use out of it). Surely something as simple and cheap as a camera should be included from the start.
I can do most of my scenario on my iPhone, except the video part as the camera is on the wrong side of the phone, but the screen is just a bit too small to do it comfortably. I was really looking forward to the larger screen to do all those same things and to be able to skype video chat too. I thought it’d be a given that it’d come with a camera like the iSight camera in the Macbooks. I think I can only get one iPad past the home financial controller so my big dillema now is do I go for the v1 device I have been waiting for ages for or do I hang on for longer and wait for the v2 that hopefully has the last main component I’d want.
I totally agree with this. If you need to do something more heavy-duty than your smartphone easily allows for but you can’t be bothered firing up your laptop or wandering to your desktop PC, the iPad will fill a gap.
If that’s not you, fine. But that doesn’t render it useless to the people for whom it *does* apply.
@Brett: You’ve exactly proved the point of the article (which I happen to think is spot on, by the way): you are not the person the iBook is targeted to.
Brett wrote, “It is interesting to see that for almost $200 less you can get a netbook with better battery life than an ipad, larger screen, full functioning OS, more storage etc. and weighing only a little more than a pound more.” This is exactly right…but for the people I know who are in the iPad’s target market, none of these things is at all important. Only geeks care about a “full functioning OS”, for the most part — if all you use your device for is e-mail and Web, and the iPad does those things cleanly and easily, a “full functioning OS” and “more storage” are immaterial to you, especially if your e-mail is on Gmail or similar and your local storage needs are zero.
On the other hand, the fact that the iPad isn’t a “full functioning OS” may actually be an advantage to those folks, because you don’t have to worry (as much) about viruses, malware, or the inevitable fiddling and tweaking that goes along with running a “full functioning OS”. The people I know who would benefit from the iPad would see a “full functioning OS” as a detriment, not a benefit.
Look, I work as a paralegal for a group of lawyers who aren’t propeller-heads, who don’t WANT to have to mess with a “full functioning OS” and all the issues (and technical knowledge requirements) that go along with that. They live 90% of their day on the phone and in Gmail, reading (and usually composing short responses to) e-mail messages. If Pages on the iPod could generate legal pleading formatted-documents, an iPad would easily be an attractive option for them. (And, if it couldn’t, I suspect they’d use Pages to edit their pleadings anyway and then e-mail them to me for formatting.) Would “skinny, simple to use, light and fast and portable” be an attractive proposition for them? You betcha.
The bottom line is simple, I think. If you need a keyboard and a bigger screen and lots of local storage and a full function OS, great – buy a Netbook, or a MacBook, or a Cray if that’s what you need. But don’t make the mistake of assuming that everyone else in the world cares about any of those things just because you do. Apple’s not making that mistake, and I think (and hope) it’ll pay off for them.
I understand that the ipad has its use as a MID. However, the whole reason it doesn’t apply to me personally is primarily the reason you said it applies to you =P. ipad might be great for reading email and composing short responses and might be great for general internet surfing, but there is no way it is good for pleadings.
As an associate in a law office, I cannot imagine doing my job on an ipad. In fact trying to type a pleading or edit a pleading without a keyboard would certainly outrage my clients due to the increase in billable hours. The best tool I have found for my job is a convertible tablet since it offers a keyboard along with the ability to handwrite and annotate drafts.
Brett, why wouldn’t you “convertible” the iPad by plugging it into the announced keyboard / charging dock? I hope we’ll eventually get bluetooth keyboard support as another solution for people who use them.
Tammy, couldn’t agree more. There are people who are geeky enough to understand closed systems and actually want one for this type of device. And I believe there are many more people who want a closed system but just aren’t geeky enough to articulate this.
Not having a finder on the iPhone has not been an issue for me, plus I think Apple can and will do a better job fleshing out alternatives. For example, MobileMe has huge potential for managing mobile device documents in the background, similarly to how iTunes manages music libraries, with the added advantage of unattended backups to the cloud.
We’re seeing a big metaphor change in what a “computer” is supposed to be, and the iPad is just one early salvo.
well said Tammy.
@Brett
“I hope we’ll eventually get bluetooth keyboard support as another solution for people who use them.”
Bluetooth keyboard support is there already. You can use any bluetooth keyboard.
@Richard:
Do tell. I thought bluetooth keyboards only worked if you jailbreak your iPhone. If they already work out of the box, that’s fantastic.
The crux of your argument is that the iPad is a one-button device that is for the non-techie people of the world and I agree 100%.
The people that argue about the iPad’s shortcomings are exactly the people who this device is not intended for.
@Jeff
So is your point that you’re incapable of reading and comprehending all the examples that have been given to you or that you’re simply too bigoted to see that anyone in the world might be different than you?
I’ve already talked with people who plan to use the iPad as a front end (via Citrix and VPN) to some very high powered computing tasks. Similarly, I know some fairly competent computer geeks (build their own computers, run Linux routinely, write their own software) who find the iPad to be appealing.
Then, of course, there are the people who are multilingual and like the ability to switch keyboards on the device.
And a million others. The fact that you can’t see anything beyond your own narrow, bigoted view of the world is a serious problem. You should probably seek help.
If the iPad isn’t about “real work,” then why does it have a productivity suite?
Just because you don’t have to write 3000-word documents or do serious spreadsheet work doesn’t mean you won’t need to write up a letter or quickly pop open a doc from work now and then…
@Paul, Why would I spend another $500 on something more powerful than my smartphone when I can boot up my netbook in a minute? That’s a year’s worth of wine! Ok, I drink the cheap stuff, but the fact is that the iPad simply does nothing I can’t, don’t already do, and it’s just too much money for a toy.
iPad has some nice features, but it’s niche. Will it be a failure? Probably not. Will it be a success? Probably not either.
@gordon Why use a microwave when I can just heat up the oven? Seems like the geeks tend to pan on the most valuable feature of devices like the iPad: a better user experience. A well-designed UX isn’t a “nice to have” for the iPad’s target market. It isn’t just a shiny bauble to entice stupid consumers to part with their money. It’s not the icing on the cake. A differentiated UX is the point entirely. My mom would never use a netbook. She doesn’t understand things like booting, moving windows around, or even copy & paste. She has no idea what “saving” means. The great thing about the iPad (and her iPhone which she’s addicted to) is that she doesn’t have to understand any of that to operate it. Why is this point so hard to get?
There are an awful lot of mothers out there with no computer skills.
Point taken. I wonder what everybody here would say if it dropped in price to $299? (though, that means the Wifi, 3G model would still be maybe $599)
I want one as a replacement for my iPod Touch – cos that’s what it is – a big iPod Touch. Apple Fanboys go lick your wounds! lol
The reaction from a lot of techies to the iPad is a bit nauseating. Those of us who are steeped in technology tend to forget that even in the West, tens of millions of people are still completely freaked out by keyboards and mice. As our societies move increasingly online, these people are increasingly left out in the cold. My mother-in-law can use SMS on her very low tech mobile phone but that’s about the limit of her technology comfort zone. She has never emailed, tweeted, facebooked, looked up Wikipedia, downloaded a song, etc. I’m absolutely convinced however that the iPad (and the multitude of Android tablets that will follow) will finally bring a very large percentage of this constituency into the 21st Century. And quite honestly, it will make no difference to them that it doesn’t do 1080p or have a camera or accept an SD card.
It is for people who you want to say (or actually do say) “oh just let me do it”.
Spot on, Sara! I don’t think I’ve ever seen a shorter or better way of describing what the iPad is, and who it is for! You are SO right!
And that target demographic is HUGE.
I have the image of some guy sowing a huge pocket to the front of his shirt for his iPad. It just seems like a less portable and more expensive iPod touch. Sure, the screen is bigger, but I have terrible eyes and have never had a visibility issue with my iPod touch.
Sorry, that got posted in the wrong place. But, no, the iPad is actually for the kind of people who say, “Oh, just let me do it… Oh, wait, you aren’t using an iPad? Never mind. Real computers are just too hard.”
Like Gary above said, at first I was disappointed in the iPad. I was hoping for . . . I don’t really know. Something more, somehow.
However, after a few days of thinking (and reading) about it, I’ve come to appreciate it for what it is.
My biggest gripe with it, now? I can’t justify purchasing one. : )
I would love to have one, but can’t think of a situation where I would every use one. I’m not on the go enough to need one, and when I actually am, I don’t do enough heavy work that I can’t just use my iPhone.
This is one of the better articles I’ve seen written about the forthcoming iPad. Thank you.
In my opinion, the biggest problem with the iPad is that it didn’t lived up to the hype that was literally created by the tech bloggers. And because the iPad wasn’t created for _them_ (it was created for the average user), they’ve begun bashing it.
Like Mike M. wrote above, the iPad is the perfect internet appliance for my mom. Or my aunt. Or my ex-father-in-law. It would be perfect for my brother. It’s not perfect for me because I’m a contract software developer and I need to take my laptop with me when I work on site.
But Apple wasn’t thinking of me. They weren’t thinking of the power user crowd. They were thinking of the other 90% of the population. Which is exactly what they should be doing.
-Ed
@Ed “In my opinion, the biggest problem with the iPad is that it didn’t lived up to the hype that was literally created by the tech bloggers.”
Couldn’t agree more. Apple is no longer a pure computer company, and the days of general-purpose, do-everything, add-a-pci-card, swap-a-motherboard consumer appliance computers are on the way out. The iPad is only the newest of emerging technologies that some in the technical press unfortunately are continuing to view through the lens of 1990s computing.
You guys very favorably estimate the average user when it comes to new technology adoption. My friend has 2 iMacs at her house. The reason? She bought one for her mom to upgrade from her ancient Dell. Mom had already learned to use Windows and the Dell (as would 99% of anyone who, say, works in an office) and was perfectly fine with what she had and what she was used to. The iMac collected dust for a year until she sent it back to my friend.
It’s not like computers were just launched into the world and there’s this throng of people who are still wondering if they can try out this “internet thing”. People are using the internet and computers already, and are looking for ways to do it more easily and better.
I’d also love to see how many of your non-techie parents are hyped up about typing on a touch screen. I would bet money my dad would freaking hate it. Even the most novice of users can 2 fingered hunt and peck on a keyboard, which turns into 1 fingered hunt and peck with the iPad. A pain for typing much more than “google.com”
I never quite got everybody saying: “it’ll just be a big iPhone, or iPod” — as if that was a bad thing? As to living up to the hype, I don’t know. Before the iPad came out I said the Kindles and one-function-tablet-readers are going to be D.O.N.E. Why? because that’s all they freakin’ do. If I could by a reader for $200 or an iPad for (what will be) $300 — I’d take the iPad and use its eReading software. As to the rest of the hype they maybe did-or-did-not deliver on — I can only think most were imaginging or hoping for was maybe a camera. Outside of that all the mock-ups had a keyboard, the apps, etc. I don’t know that Mac didn’t deliver on many of the features all the techies hoped or predicted it would have. I think they just dropped (temporarily) the camera — and delivered on the rest.
@Wesley:
“My biggest gripe with it, now? I can’t justify purchasing one. : )”
That’s OK. I”m buying 3. That will make up for you not getting one.
My biggest gripe is that I want it NOW, not in March.
I’ve got three words for everyone:
Notion Ink Adam
@Matt: the Notion Ink tablet looks very cool, but hardware isn’t everything. Android tablets are still hampered by Google’s unwillingness to open up their proprietary apps, including the Android Market, to non-phone devices. Android tablets also have to either run standard Android unskinned, which may or may not scale well for larger-than-smartphone screens, or add a device-specific UI on top, which complicates the OS upgrade path. All of these things, I think, will give the iPad a relative advantage in the general consumer market.
I have my own consulting business and I switched from Windows machines to Macs in 2008. When I work at home, it’s on a 24″ iMac. On the road, I take my 15″ MacBook Pro. Last fall, I bought a MacBook Air so I’d have something light to take with me on a trip to Paris and Prague. I am a complete techie who started coding in Fortran in 1968.
I WILL be standing in line waiting for the doors to open on the day the iPad goes on sale at my local Apple store. If the iPad had been available, I would have bought it instead of the MacBook Air. It’s lighter and it would have handled everything I did while in Europe (emails, web surfing, emailing photos back to friends and family, etc.).
Liam, your post is spot on. For all of the whiners who will invariably call you a “fanboi,” they simply have to read some of your past posts where you don’t spare the lash when you think Apple deserves it. Keep up the good work.
Thanks WaltN, very kind of you to say, and much appreciated. I fear the trolls will disagree, though! :-)
Hear! Hear! Walt.
I’m a sysadmin, and I’ll be in line for one the first day. However, I see a downside for the moms out there who don’t have another computer: How will they handle updates to the OS? Without an automatic over-the-air scheme, they’ll have to wait for their sons or daughters to handle the task — and then could lose the media they loaded or bought after synching with another computer’s iTunes. Let’s hope Apple addresses this somehow. Also, an Internet-based backup option seems like a win for MobileMe should Apple improve on it ever.
I’m sorry to read that you converted your business IT from something only moderately crippled to something COMPLETELY crippled.
You would have saved money and become more effective switching to Linux rather than throwing thousands of dollars away for PCs that offer you even less options.
Macs suck at business. I feel sorry for your clients.
Course, this being an Apple blog I’ll just be dismissed as a troll because I don’t blindly worship Apple products.
I made the move too all Apple products starting 3 years ago (I bought my first Apple II in 1978, and went PC in ’83), and have not looked back. The iPad seems perfect for people like my sister, for whom I must replace her PC every few years and she needs little more than web access and email. But here is my question:
Is the iPad meant to be a stand alone product – one that can link to a network to do its own printing, backup and storage; or will it be necessary to sync it with some sort of bigger desktop or notebook computer in order to manage its software and media libraries a la the iPhone? THIS to me will be the deciding factor as to whether or not this product can be considered a success. All of the little niceties that are currently missing – ports, multitasking, etc. – can all be fixed later in updates and changes. But if the iPad cannot manage itself in the real world on its own, if it is only designed as an appendage to a more complicated system, then it will seriously miss its market.
Finally, someone got it right. I couldn’t agree more.
Thanks Liam for this simple and efficient analysis.
Of course, there are still some “wanabee-clever” geeks that don’t seem to have yet understood what simplicity and accessibility mean.
But I’m sure they’ll come back into real life one day…
Considering that the iPad’s and iPod touch’s OSes are practically identical, but the iPod touch is pocket sized and cheap, I’d say that the more simple and accessible option would be the iPod touch.
I find it strange that so many of the contributions to this discussion describe the iPad as serving a niche market. Surely if you go by the definition of the word ‘niche’, the real niche market is the techie power user. The way in which many techies write off the iPad is reminiscent of the way Marie Antoinette was famously ignorant about the eating habits of her subjects. The vast majority of them had no need for cake and wanted only bread. Steve Jobs is going to sell a lot of loaves.
Software development, media production and content authoring have always been the niches. Media / content consumption and communication are the mass markets. I think you’re correct that too many in the technical press have this backwards.
David, I agree with you. The iPad is a new class of device, but I’d never call it “niche”.
I suspect this type of device (the iPad and the inevitable clones that follow) will become as mainstream and commonplace as mobile phones.
I just want to know which one to buy. I think the 32 GB but maybe the 64 GB? If I buy all the iWork(?) modules will the files take up much room?
I’m guessing that all of the iWork modules will be around 0.5-0.7 GB (my current folder containing Pages, Keynote, and Numbers for the Mac is 0.7 GB)-and those will be among the largest apps on the device.
You’re not going to need 64 GB for apps. You’ll need the extra space if you intend to keep a lot of books, pictures, and (especially) videos on your iPad.
@Joe: I’m not so certain about that. The Myst port for the iPhone is a good 0.5 GB all on its own, and I think that the iPad’s larger form factor and potential for more full-featured UI will lean towards larger application sizes, especially if iPhone and iPad versions are bundled as a universal binary.
It doesn’t make any sense that it would be larger than the Mac OS X version which is 0.7 GB on my system. It could be less – if they leave out some templates and functions. There’s just no way it could be more than the OS X version.
@Joe: My point wasn’t about the size of the iWork apps per se, but more about the assumption that iPad apps in general will be smaller than 0.75 GB or so. If we’re already seeing 0.5 GB and larger downloads for the iPhone, then it stands to reason that the richer UI elements that the iPad enables could produce even larger apps, so taking app space into account when thinking about which model to purchase is not unreasonable.
I find it quite amusing that some people bought and swallowed the microwave analogy… may be you need to use either again to remember how they work. For clearance of doubt, microwave heats/warms your food fast, basic oven doesnt. puh!
Nevertheless, every gadget has its own use. But the shame of this article for apple is that the ipad which launched targetting techys is now subtly being refocused on “the colossal majority of non-techy folk who simply don’t care about cameras, physical keyboards or “closed” operating systems.” tut! tut!!
@Godwyns
“But the shame of this article for apple is that the ipad which launched targetting techys”
Really? Where did Apple say it was for ‘techys’? Apple laid out a bunch of functions of the device without saying who it was for. Basically, it is for anyone who wants to browse the web, check email, read books, do presentations, play games, etc on a small, easy to use, lightweight device which is neither a smartphone nor a laptop.
Doesn’t sound like any definition of ‘techys’ I know of.
I’m with Joe here…I don’t recall anything Apple said or did that implied it was ever “targeted” at techys. If anything, I’d argue it was the opposite from the start.
Nothing Jobs said suggested the device was in any way aimed at techies. Quite the opposite.
Not that I remember Apple stating that it is for non-techy people either. While unveiling the iPad, Steve Jobs said it is “our most advanced technology in a magical and revolutionary device at an unbelievable price”.
“Most advanced” obviously wont be targetted at non-techys… So I am not entirely wrong.
My point is that the article rather demeans the supposedly beautiful iPad & I dont think Apple wanted to be seen as building non-advanced gadget.
Watch Steve Jobs launch it again here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9E2JCtWzk8 and tell if all that capabilities of an iPad is something for a non-techy… music, video, editing pictures, calendars, etc.
There could be a better way to pass the message this article was aiming at but not in this manner.
@Godwyns On the contrary. If VW describe the engine in their new Jetta as the “most advanced technology” you wouldn’t conclude that this meant it was aimed at F1 drivers would you? Similarly, a technical user is unlikely to think “gee…if Steve says it’s the most advanced technology then I’d better rush out and buy one.” It’s the non-technical mass market that will be impressed by phrases like that. In contrast, a technical audience might be interested to hear details about the own-brand processor but Jobs gave away absolutely no details on that!
@Godwyns:
““Most advanced” obviously wont be targetted at non-techys… So I am not entirely wrong.”
That is, of course, nonsense. Car makers advertise their advanced technologies. Are cars only for geeks? Heck, there are dishwashing liquids that advertise their advanced technology. Is THAT for geeks?
First, the keynote was clearly targeted at the general public, via the press. When Apple wants to target geeks, they introduce things at a Developer’s Conference.
Second, the entire presentation was about things that the users would do – look at pictures, read books, browse the web, get email. If it was for geeks, they’d have talked a lot more about exactly what the A4 processor is and how the display interacts with the GPU, and so on.
Anyone who thinks that this introduction was for geeks is really, really out of touch with reality.
@Joe Funny that we gave the same analogy about cars and made the exact same point about the processor.
A “basic oven doesnt” heat food.
Godwyns , what type of oven did you buy? I have some swamp land I want to sell you!
Also, we ALL want to see your computer. Do you have to crank it to boot it up? LOL
Extending the popcorn analogy: A lot of those moms love Facebook. And a lot of them play games. And those games are Flash based. Unless Zynga and the rest have the means to create iPad apps that tie into Facebook, a lot of moms may think something is broken. I could care less about Fishville or CafeWorld; however, the masses trying to sign into their Facebook accounts at ReadWriteWeb (because Google lists an RWW article about logins high in its search results) may get frustrated quickly. We’ll see soon enough.
Forgot to finish the popcorn analogy. I hope the iPad isn’t like the Microwave that can do everything BUT pop corn (Facebook and popular flash games).
The fact that you even needed to defend the product tells that there is a problem.
There was not the same level of negative noise in the days before the iPhone 1.0 handset was available as there is now for this new device.
The iPad has problems and it will not be as big of a seller as Apple wants it to be.
It could still be though. The smart buyers imo will be the ones who wait till the 2.0 or even 3.0 version of the device comes out.
“There was not the same level of negative noise in the days before the iPhone 1.0 handset was available”
Nonsense. The press was full of stories that Apple was too late to the party and no one would ever buy an iPhone. It was too expensive. Too large. No physical keyboard. ‘No multitasking’. No Flash. All the same whining you hear about the iPad. AT&T lockin would cause it to fail. ‘Short’ battery life. Unreplaceable batteries. And so on. The stories just didn’t end for months.
The difference, of course, is that you’d think people would have learned from how badly they misjudged the iPhone, but apparently some people are incapable of learning.
It’s not my job to comment on Liam’s motivation in writing this post. I can however comment on my motivation for participating in the subsequent discussion. I am a software engineer working in the mobile space. I have never written a single line of code for any Apple device, however, and I am not an Apple shareholder. I have nothing to gain personally therefore from defending the iPad. The truth is that I have found a lot of the criticism levelled at the iPad to be embarrassingly juvenile. It has highlighted for me the sheer number of anoraks there are in my profession, completely detached from the reality of what end users require from mobile devices and mobile device software.
@David:
“It has highlighted for me the sheer number of anoraks there are in my profession, completely detached from the reality of what end users require from mobile devices and mobile device software.”
Well said. While Mac fans understand that there can be good, legitimate reasons for not writing Mac (or iPhone or iPad) software, it gets really, really tiring after years listening to juvenile attacks from people who have never bothered to learn a thing about Macs yet insist that “Macs are toys” or “no one uses Macs” or “Macs can’t be used in business” or “Macs are just as insecure as Windows” and so on. Invariably, they follow those remarks with “I wouldn’t be caught dead using a Mac” and don’t realize how foolish it looks to be vocally criticizing a product they’ve never used and never bothered to learn the basic facts about.
Sure there was:
- there’s only one button?
- No SDK?
- No MMS?
- The free phone I got with my cell plan shoots video, my $500 phone wont?
- Wait, it’s $500.
- I can’t connect to Exchange?
- No cut and paste? REALLY?
- Apple will never compete with RIM. Why even try?
- Wait? No voice dialing either?
“The fact that you even needed to defend the product tells that there is a problem.”
Defend it from what? More like defend it from who. It’s not even out for sale yet and your sticking pins in your IPad dolls.
What are you afraid of???
I guess I should buy more Apple stock! Another success, if the PC trolls fear it.
When the iPod was first announced, a lot of people criticized it for what it *didn’t* do, much like the current iPad criticism.
We all know how that turned out.
Here in my home office I can see no less than seven computers – iMac, Mini, iPhone, MacBook, G4 and 2 Dells. When I get sick of working I go downstairs and flop on the couch and read a book. Only I’m old, and that print is just getting smaller. If only I could zoom the letters like on my 24″ iMac. The MacBook will do that, but damn it’s awkward to read while lying on my back. iPhone is too small. Hey, the Kindle! It’s only… $400. For another bill, I can have an iPad — a full color, lightweight, one handed book viewer with a computer on the side. True, it won’t pop corn, but that’s what my cast-off cell phone is for!
One arm holding the baby, one arm holding the iPad, one arm used to type and navigate on the iPad. The perfect device for 3-Armed Carol.
@Jason:
“One arm holding the baby, one arm holding the iPad, one arm used to type and navigate on the iPad. The perfect device for 3-Armed Carol.”
It’s obvious that you’ve never held a sleeping infant. Unless you’re incredibly clumsy, it’s quite easy to hold the child AND hold a book in the same hand. I used to read all the time while holding my daughter. Using the iPad would be just as easy.
@Joe: Seems like it’d be pretty easy to rest a small laptop in your lap for that exact purpose, then. It’s a pretty silly analogy.
Given the option, if you’re typing more than a sentence or two, are you going to want to use one hand or two to type it?
“Seems like it’d be pretty easy to rest a small laptop in your lap for that exact purpose, then. It’s a pretty silly analogy.”
Once again, it’s hard to believe that you’ve ever held an infant in your arms. Holding an infant while holding a laptop and typing would be nearly impossible.
Holding an infant while reading from the iPad would be easily possible. I wouldn’t want to type a novel while doing so, but that wasn’t the point.
Try holding a laptop at arms length and a IPad at arms length and see how long you can do it.
I would even spot you a 20 seconds!
My new laptop weighs WAY more than an IPad. Can’t hold it with one hand for more than 10 seconds.
Also, you have to place the laptop in a stable, clear, and flat location. A baby would be lying on the keyboard if it was in your lap!
Also, to reply to the silly Microwave Oven comparison…the microwave offered a rather distinct advantage. Bake a potato in 9 minutes instead of 60. It cut tasks that are 30-60 minutes long into only a few minutes. It also is much smaller than the oven.
To make that analogy more appropriate, the iPad is like an oven sized microwave. It does pretty much what your microwave does, but it’s much bigger so you have more room to do it.
@Jason:
Way to go – you simply proved that any analogy could be stretched way too far.
The point is that the iPad will do many of the things that a laptop or smartphone will do, but its size, shape, features, OS, etc allow it to offer some advantages over both.
Just as I would never argue that everyone needs a 17″ laptop and 13″ laptops are for morons, I would also not argue that the iPad is for everyone. Similarly, a BMW and a Yugo will both get you where you want to go. That doesn’t mean that they’re interchangeable and that there’s no reason to choose the BMW over the Yugo.
The discussion is really very simple. Lots of people have given lots of reasons why the iPad would be preferable in some circumstances – and that they might buy one.
You (and a few others) don’t get that and are incapable of getting past simplistic comparisons (‘but netbooks are cheaper’ or ‘laptops are more powerful’ or ‘smartphones are lighter’).
The iPad is one possible computing device. LOTS of people (it’s sold out in some countries even before it is released) think that the particular combination of size, price, and features appeals to them. The fact that YOU don’t get it doesn’t negate that fact.
Lots of people bought a MacBook Air, too. I just think the notion that it’s going to somehow change the computing world is a silly one. This isn’t the iPod launch. This isn’t the iPhone launch. There’s a small subset of people with very specific needs and this device will work for them. I imagine the crossover between those users and MacBook Air users is very high. Just as the MacBook Air was a niche/novelty device and didn’t change the computing world, this won’t either. It will likely sell a bit more than the MacBook air just because a lot more gadgetheads can drop $500 than can drop $1900.
I think the biggest reason people are disappointed is that this device is so close to replacing a computer, and instead is designed (was it a rush? a scheme to sell iPad v2?) as a complement to a real computer. You still need a desktop/laptop (or both, if you are the type of person that needs both). You still need a phone. If you had a dedicated MP3 player besides your phone (IE Not an iPhone) you still need that.
It seems so anti to what Apple has tried to go for with the iPhone, which is simplifying things and bringing them into one place. Carrying an MP3 player and a phone? Buy the iPhone! it’s good at both AND a web browser! That’s a big deal. The iPad doesn’t let you simplify and replace devices…if you’re using a netbook, it can’t replace that…it’s too big to replace your MP3 player….it can’t replace your business laptop or your desktop. It’s ANOTHER device…I don’t know many “average joes” who are looking to add more gadget clutter to their lives. THAT is why this device is going to be primarily for gadgetheads, and that is why not pleasing the gadgetheads is a recipe for fail.
Or maybe Apple designed this device specifically with niche business markets like hospitals etc. etc. etc. that people have mentioned in mind. *shrug*
Jason, I was with you up to the very last. To me, all the reasons you cited are they very ones that would lead the non-gadgetheads to purchase an iPad. I work in a very low-tech industry, and I’m surrounded by people who do not have iPhones, MacBook Airs, or even iPods. Sure they use a computer for work and even have one at home for email and photos, but they wouldn’t call a computer part of their lives. A fancy iMac for email? A $500 phone? Never. And what’s a netbook? But a small device that does just enough of everything? Put it in your purse, take it to the store, take it all over the house with ease, take it to Disneyworld to amuse the kids while you stand in line? And the screen is big enough to see (this is important if you’re over 40, and lots of us are). They might go for that, especially for the price. I think you’re right, the gadgetheads don’t need it because they’ve already got it covered. But there are tons of people who don’t fall into that category. The iPad has utility for “the rest of us” and I think that’s how it’s going to succeed.
In my family my two daughters and I each have iPod touches. My wife is finally expressing interest in having an iPod of her own around the house, but with our single iMac in constant and increasing use from me and two teens, we’ve pretty much decided that Mom’s iPod touch is going to be an iPad–our internet/email/music streaming device.
Jason, sorry to burst your bubble, but the first commercially available microwave ovens were much larger than conventional ovens, and much less efficient (and so slower) than they are today.
Either you’re just arguing for the sake of it (in which case, thanks for being a consistent devil’s advocate, all debates need one!) or you’re failing completely to understand the point of the article; that, just because you can’t see the point (and utility) of the iPad doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist, and certainly doesn’t mean it won’t be needed by a great many people.
I think (like most of the non-troll commenters here) you’re much too intelligent and universally good-looking for it to be the latter.
My main gripe with the iPad is that I was honestly ready to buy one, but it feels like Apple really half assed it. They really innovated with the iPhone, but it feels like the bare minimum of effort was put forth to make the iPad. Let’s take an iPhone and put it into the case of a 10″ LCD. Ta-da! Maybe I’m wrong and the whole world is aching to have a web-browsing-no-web-video-watching machine…if so, then hey, that’s why they pay Mr Jobs the big bucks.
I don’t debate it will sell to some people, and people have made a great case for it selling to business niches. I just have seen a lot of articles that are greatly overestimating the appeal of this sort of thing to the “casual” crowd. Maybe I don’t know the same types of casuals, but the people that begrudgingly learned how to use Windows XP because they absolutely had to? I don’t see them wanting to jump headfirst into a completely new computing platform. I envision a lot of people grumpily trudging through typing a 5 paragraph e-mail with one finger and giving up and moving to a computer with a keyboard. How many random little apps that so and so likes will they be completely grumpy that they can’t run on their iPad?
To me, the last thing the non-techie wants is to have *TWO* computers, especially when the iPad costs just as much as a nice desktop. I don’t know many non-techies who just really need to check their e-mail while sitting on the couch. Me? That’s why I have a netbook. For browsing screwing around, or on the train, or at work when I have down time. My mom? She gets all the computing she needs at her desk top, and when she’s away from it, SHE’S AWAY FROM IT. Hell, the lady doesn’t even SMS message. Why does that type of person need a second computer?
The reason I find this so frustrating is that with even a minor amount of extra effort, this device could be doing all that. Maybe they are afraid of cannibalizing 13″ MacBook sales, or are trying to leave something for the upgrade….but it wouldn’t be hard to make a fully capable device here. It feels like Apple purposely chose not to, and I can’t see why leaving off the USB port (which is obviously important enough that they sell an attachment for it) is a good thing for anyone.
What will be really interesting to me is to see how this fares after the huge wave of windows/linux/android/etc. devices come out, offering most/all of the functionality people are bitching out at a significant price drop. Will “average computer user” feel that it’s worth paying extra for the Apple device? I wonder how far that Apple premium price will stretch to people who don’t give a damn about the image of the device.
But Jason, again, your main issue is with what’s not in the iPad, when the target market does not care one jot about those “missing” features. You say you find those missing features really frustrating. The customer the iPad was made for isn’t going to feel frustrated. They’re going to feel relieved!
“The last thing non-techies want,” as you put it, “is two computers”.
I agree with you. And I humbly suggest that non-techhies will rarely (if ever) perceive their iPad to be a computer.
Do we perceive our microwave ovens to be electric motors with buzzing magnetrons and metal cages to prevent all that ionizing radiation from seeping out? Nope. We only perceive the utility.
Do people think of their car as a cumbersome combustion engine and mobile computer and upholstery suite? Nope. They see only the *utility* in their car.
I think the same is true of the upcoming iPad. People won’t think of the iPad as “another computer” – they will think only of its valuable utility as a convenient and quick mechanism for naturally doing, with instant-on and intuitive touch and a swipe, the light (but important) everyday digital things.
If they want more – that’s when they will say “Oh, I need to use my *computer* for that, not the iPad.”
Just as they should. After all, it’s an appliance.
@Jason:
“The iPad doesn’t let you simplify and replace devices…if you’re using a netbook, it can’t replace that…i”
Depends how you use a netbook. If all you do with your netbook is browse the web, check email, and track calendars, etc… while you’re away from your desk, then maybe an iPad can replace your netbook.
@liam, unfortunately, the iPad (as advertised today) is an appliance that needs a computer. For updates. For syncing. For backups. I’ll get one for myself, but my dad lives too far away for me to handle any of those chores for him. He’ll never brave an Apple Store. So how will he deal with the inevitable need to have his iPad’s OS updated? When Apple answers this with automatic, zero-hassle, painlessly backed up over-the-air goodness, then I can truck down to his condo, install an AirPort Express, and get him on “The Interneter.”
@Liam said “The customer the iPad was made for isn’t going to feel frustrated. They’re going to feel relieved!”
Agree.
One of the reasons I read TAB is because it is based on a winning combination of opinion balanced by fact, which makes it both informative and enjoyable. I don’t read it so that I can hear someone spouting their supercilious and boring opinions over everyone. Grow up people.
You’re being ironic, right?
That’s what you’re doing?
Cos, y’see, your comment complains about the “supercilious and boring” opinions of others, and yet, is itself a supercilious and boring comm––
Ahhh, you *knew* what you were doing! Clever man, aren’t you? Aren’t you!
Clever.
Great for students, travelers. A media “thin client”. A supersized iPad Touch (not a bad thing to be, IMHO–they are great devices and very popular).
I will get one, at some point. Better than a net book for someone, like me, who already has two “real”, full-featured Macs.
Fine. Don’t buy one. More for me. :)
In my life, the iPad is exactly what would fit in that one area where I would like to have access to a computer, but where a laptop would be cumbersome (exactly BECAUSE of the keyboard) and the iPhone simply too small. Bring it on. I buy 3. And then two more for my parents and in-laws.
I won’t bother carrying a laptop on vacation, nor is a netbook an option for me because as configured it’s just a very poor laptop.
Based on what I’ve learned so far, I will carry an iPad on vacation. Speculation is wonderful, isn’t it? :-)
And (gasp) I might just carry the iPad and leave my cell phone at home. Then I can still surf, and email, and chat, and skype, and facebook, and tweet, and blog, and read a book, etc.
If the ‘nerd tech’ hate it, then it’s going to be a success. I’m amazed at the shortsightedness of the whiners here. I suspect that they are just a bunch of scared windoze users who don’t get it.
Liam…Preach it!
You got that right. iPad is getting a good reception from people with jobs. =)
IBM making business apps for iPad:
http://obamapacman.com/2010/02/ibm-plans-business-apps-for-apple-ipad-tablet-iphone/
Doctors interested in iPad:
http://obamapacman.com/2010/02/epocrates-reports-1-in-4-doctors-likely-to-buy-apple-ipad-tablet-within-the-year/
I don’t appreciate the fact that women in general, and “wives” in particular, are singled out as the customers most likely to benefit from the “simple,” “uncomplicated” iPad. The implication is that women everywhere are not intune enough with technology (or just flat-out too stupid) to require a device that actually does useful things. I’m a young woman who has no use for the iPad.
Sadie, when I was creating my fictional Carol it never crossed my mind she was not “in tune” with technology. I didn’t assume she was flat-out stupid, either. And that’s probably because I’m not a misogynistic bigot. But thanks for the assumption.
Carol is a strong, independent woman with three kids. She’s obviously had a busy day and she values the utility and practicality the iPad offers over the fiddly impracticalities (in the scenario I described) of a laptop. That doesn’t mean she’s in any way incapable, and I feel it’s a little insulting you infer I’m being sexist.
Not every man in this world is out to get you or your gender.
But re-read my article and see if you can spot the wickedly cruel racism and homophobia I cunningly hid there. Go on, I’m sure you can.
:-(
I am reading a lot into the choice of ‘Carol’ as the name for the fictional character in the piece. This was clearly a gibe at non-Christian readers. The piece was also racist and elitist. After all, nothing says white and middle class like a soccer game. And by mentioning children, the piece was grossly insensitive towards people who, for whatever reason, are unable to have children of their own. Shame on you Liam, shame on you.
I relate to Liam’s hypothetical Carol, and I’m a male 20-something geek. Sure, I may feel comfortable discussing technical topics, but overall I’m less interested in what makes a gadget tick and more interested in what I can do with it. I don’t want to fight with technology; I just want it to work.
I can see the iPad as a special appliance for special people. I also remember many of the people who are praising the iPad blasted the Macbook air for its lack of connectivity to external hard drives etc. So what’s different?
I look at the iPad as an entertainment device married to one supplier of goodies. much like a TV that only plays one channel. for that ,I wouldn’t pay 400 cents Let alone $400. Remember all the beefs about the iphone experience with ATT. Do you really think the ipad experience with ATT will be any better with a million or so more users? If you do, I know where a bridge is for sale—cheap.
Yes, and the Air was a resounding commercial success. Except … oh, wait.
What do you mean by “special people” ?????
I would rephrase that ASAP!
“Special People” also means “Disabled People” in many circles.
“There’s a backlash in the tech community against Apple’s iPad.”
No there’s not.
Inspired comment, really useful. Thanks.
I think I will get one for my mom this mother’s day :) She has always been wanting to know how to use a computer and all…but she never really got around that. Haha. Some people just can’t get computers.
But I think she will like the iPad. Haha. Since she can’t get how a mouse works, she can touch whatever she wants to open! :D That’s cool right. She’d know how to use it from the beginning… :)
I guess these are the kind of people the iPad would appeal to. :D
The iPad is too cool not to have.
And once it is loaded with all your e-books, e-newpapers, and e-magazines, it will be super cool!
I love the microwave analogy. That is spot on.
But you got the on/off part wrong. The beauty of the iPad is you don’t have to turn it on or off. IT’s always on. It sleeps when not in use. And Jobs said it can sleep for 30 days on 1 charge.
Last, based on my Touch/iPhone experience, it is going to much nicer to browse on the iPad than on my Mac.
No Chris, it was written from the POV of the fictional Carol. To her, that’s not the “Sleep/Wake” button, it’s just the button she uses to turn the thing “on and off”.
Got to the iPad in my next shopping list.
I have better things, that are more fun to blow $500 on. Also $500 is the base price. $800 if you want to talk seriously about this device.
Why wouldn’t Carol just use her iphone to write the e-mail? She could save herself $500.
The things it can do, I agree, it does them well. I just want it to do more. And there is NO reason it can’t. Other than Apple deciding they don’t want it to. This smacks the same as when a game developer fast-tracks their game to get it out earlier. Or if you want to be cynical, Jobs know’s he’s going to make money on the early adopters before a real iPad is released. One that does the things we expected it to do.
I love apple. I love my imac and my iphone. But I don’t see a place for this device at the price it’s going for. The real price. Why criticize techies when they ask reasonable questions about a product? If the device is not meant for a techie, I guess I won’t buy it. I mean, why court my opinion? I’m just a consumer.
Also, saying the micro-wave oven was “seemingly pointless”? Bit of a stretch. I remember the micro-wave oven. It was miraculous. It cooked things in seconds. No preheating, just BAM! Hardly a comparison.
“I love my imac and my iphone. But I don’t see a place for this device at the price it’s going for.”
Your totally nuts!
You spend way over a hundred bucks a month on the IPhone AT&T phone contract, but this IPad is to expensive??? Pretty lame argument. You could buy five IPads for the price of your AT&T two year phone contract. Six with the IPhone. You sound more like a PC troll trolling for a fight, than an Apple user.
People like you were whining that it was going to be a thousand bucks or more when they released it! Sorry, 499.00 is NOT a thousand bucks. This price point must totally just bum you out. It is going to sell BIG.
Also, maybe Carol wants to see her email a little easier and wants to jettison her glasses for a larger screen?
@cc: how does owning an iPad replace the iPhone cost? he still needs a phone, he still needs a data plan. the iPad is a $500+ device with a possible $30/data plan. It’s not like it replaces his iPhone, which is the point i’ve been making all along
I don’t think dumbing-down the already BASIC computing technology available is the way of the future. If you can learn how to use a touch screen iPad you can sure as hell sit down and take the time to learn a full OS with a keyboard. Its not rocket science. You move the mouse and click on applications to start them. I would have to show my 60 year old parents how to use an iPad just as much as a regular OS.
People need to wake up and learn how to use the basics already, especially if they’re a middle aged mother with kids. It doesn’t take YEARS of trial and error to learn email and basic internet browsing, who are we kidding? Most people who can actually afford to have a toy like the iPad probably already have a computer and are just too lazy to learn how to really be efficient with it. Basic things that Liam claims the iPad is used for are already basic on a full OS. Not everyone who buys this thing will be holding a baby 24/7, thats such a vague example. You don’t HAVE to check your email while you hold the baby and watch your TiVo (yeah recorded content that can be paused). Don’t be ridiculous.
A keyboard is undeniably more efficient, so who’s to say that iPad is “easier” to use if the person using it isn’t even proficient with a real keyboard? There are far more important things a middle aged mother should spend $500-$800 of EXTRA money on if she already has a laptop or desktop sitting in the living room. Sit down and learn how to use technology that’s been the same for almost a decade now.
I think you need to read this:
http://funkatron.com/site/comments/were-the-stupid-ones-facebook-google-and-our-failure-as-developers/
“Its not rocket science. You move the mouse and click on applications to start them. I would have to show my 60 year old parents how to use an iPad just as much as a regular OS.”
Full OS:
-learn how to switch the thing on and how to shut it down properly.
-learn the difference between a single click, double-click, click-and-hold, right-click, dragging and dropping, and so on.
-learn the difference between active and inactive applications, and that on a Mac you need to quit programs for them to go away completely.
iPad:
-learn how to point with your finger.
-learn how to wake it up and put it to sleep.
-learn how to get back to the home screen.
There’s a little more to in than that, of course, but if I’m tasked with teaching my mom–who will never touch a computer–how to get online, well, I can tell you without hesitation which one I’d give to her: an iPad.
After reading this thread, I have a feeling that a ton of middle aged mothers of a lot of overzealous Apple fans are going to have a new $500 paperweight
Amen – I don’t really have anything else to day…
I must say. I love my iPhone. Worth all the hype to me. It is kinda locked down by AT&T and Apple, but it is such a smooth device. The applications run so smooth, scroll smoothly, and the device itself looks and feels so smooth. This is worth a lot. The iPad has this same kind of thinking built into it I’m sure.
For this feature alone, the iPad will succeed, just as the iPhone has done.
Clunky, ugly, heavy, cheap feel, hard to read, scrolls crappy, hard to use, complicated, unstable. This is what we are used to with PCs. But they do everything and are compatible with everything. This is the problem with Apple. And its a pretty big one.
If Apple would ever stop whining about loosing control and open things up a little bit, they would go from being a cult like digital device manufacturer, to the next Microsoft or Google.
I really wish they would figure that out, because it would be pretty sweet to have Apple awesomeness as the standard, rather than just for artists and non-tech folk.
Easiest example: No flash on iPad or iPhone. This is ridiculous. So much of the web is going flash based. How can Apple say it is the best surfing device when I can’t see a substantial portion of the web?
Lack of imagination? I see, criticizing Apple for yet another non-innovative product that lacks actual features one would find useful is the result of being unimaginative?
Steve Jobs is supposedly expecting the iPad to kill netbooks. How can it do that when the iPad doesn’t even have HALF the basic features a netbook has? Does Apple really think you can get more done with less functionality? Or is this yet another Apple fanboy blog trying to defend a product that, like all Apple products, simply isn’t worth defending?
How many fucking Apple products do you own? Do you get a hard on every time Steve Jobs is seen on TV or in pictures? Do you have an orgasm every time he speaks? Do you rush to your nearest Apple Store to buy the latest lump of non-functional non-innovation Steve Jobs tells you to? If Steve Jobs unvailed a blunt toothpick that doesn’t actually pick your teeth would you buy it anyway?
God, these Apple blogs are horrific. Nothing but Steve Jobs Cultists living in a reality distortion bubble that think that Apple’s actually made an impact on how people compute. At least Linux and Windows bloggers have the balls to actually admit when something sucks about what they blog about. Apple fanboys like the author of this blog never do.
In fact, I’ve had so many Macfags come up to me to claim so many bullshit things about Macs that was never true, such as:
1. Macs are higher quality than PCs. I have yet to see proof of this. Since Macs are now PC hardware down to the metal, I SERIOUSLY doubt Macs have any higher hardware qualities than PCs.
2. Mac OS X never crashes. Oh man. If I could fill an IRC channel with people who got fed up with OS X’s crashes, I’d have one damned busy chat room. Assuming the Apple fanboys ever look outside their bubble, they’ll see PLENTY of people who got fed up.
3. Mac OS X doesn’t have viruses or spyware. (OS X has ten times as many viruses as Linux (That’s around 300 to 500 viruses in the wild. Still only roughly 1% compared to the total number of in-the-wild threats for Windows there are. And there’s plenty of spyware to go around.)
4. Mac OS X is perfectly secure. Is this why Macs were the first to go down five years running in cracking contests in the US? That’s WITH the system fully hardened, cultists.
5. They are technically correct in this one, but the way they put it is in a very dishonest and misleading implication: Macs run Windows software. True, but the way they put it is to imply Macs run Windows software without Windows, as if somehow OS X managed to get a fully functional Windows API in it, as if. Remember, they imply very strongly that Windows would have no part in it, which is incorrect.
6. Macs aren’t overpriced, they’re just more powerful. I love this one. Give me that money you wasted on a Mac. I will build a PC with the same amount and come out with a machine that’d run circles around that little toy you call a computer. In fact. I HAVE done this. And it shut up one very irate fanboy.
7. Macs are not PCs. Sorry to say that they are now PCs more than ever since becoming IBM PC compatibles. Of course even before they went x86/x86_64 MAcs were STILL PCs. Just because Jobs tells a lie onstage about what Mac actually is doesn’t mean you have to swallow it.
8. Non-Mac PCs are always Windows machines and thus all of Windows problems are actuall PC problems. I love this one. It’s propaganda spread by Apple’s own Misinformation Department. The entire Get A Mac campaign is an attempt to blur the lines between the hardware you use and the software that drives it. Make no mistake: Get A Mac is NOT Mac vs. PC, they are very clearly Mac OS X vs. Windows.
The iPad is just an oversized iPod Touch. And it sure as hell won’t shove any netbook market share aside like Steve Jobs claims. Of course, the Cult of Steve Jobs will just ignore what I say here and insist the iPad is actually going to be worth their money.
Can we have an Apple blog that isn’t written by a self-deluded author, PLEASE?
@Anonymous; Feel better after all that? ;-)
Um, who cares about any of this? Yours is just a scathing opinion piece about a new consumer electronics device – not a computer per se – written by either a bona fide computer IT person or a geek-hobbyist / wannabe.
I so don’t care whether x86 or x86_64 is under the hood. Since you apparently do, it’s evident that you are not the target customer for the iPad or other similar products – Apple or otherwise – that are likely to follow.
It’s not about features, it’s about the experience of simplcity, pleasure in use and peace of mind.
You are aware that you’re arguing why iPads suck, right? I don’t think you do because you went off on a nice long my-homemade-windows-machine-sexes-me-up-better-than-any-mac-ever-could rant. (Damn, that was a lot of hyphens) Anyways, only about 2 out of 11 paragraphs you wrote were relevant to this article, so maybe next time you build a kick-ass, x86/x86_64, homemade, theappleblog.com comment, you could try to stay more on topic for the sake of my constantly decreasing attention span.
mrs. willaims had waited @ the last minute to tell us and how are we suppose to finish this test or wateva it iz and it iz almost ime 4 duz calss da go and once agian luv da technology class
this is about the new apple product. some people are saying that this product is usless but some people disagree. some people say that people that use this product are lazy
they are fighting that people don’t know if the product is good or not and there lazy
The thing i just read is about the controversy on whether this product is good or not. Some people thinks its good and others just feel it shows lack of motivation.
The iPad isn’t just for non-geeks. I have a trusty MacBook Pro and an iPhone, and as superfluous as it may sound, I’ve wished for an iPad before it actually existed. When I got my iPhone, I found myself many times pulling it out to do menial tasks or find some information online, even with the MBP handy. There’s something not quite casual about using a laptop. It draws my focus more and makes me less relaxed overall. The iPhone, while completely casual, frankly still provides a rather frustrating online experience. Constant pinching and scrolling to get to information becomes tiring quickly. The iPad fills the gap perfectly: virtually full-sized environment while maintaining a casual atmosphere.
Like you, I’ve imagined an iPad for years (with blog posts to prove it – lol), because I understand what I *don’t* want in a computer. Every time I visit my dear mom and spend hours helping her resolve PC problems I’m reminded of this – both for her and myself.
I suspect that true geeks who really understand computers and computing, inside and out, authors and users, systems and applications, components and soul, are the ones who will most appreciate the iPad, both for what it is and isn’t. And as much as I prefer Apple, the wave that’s coming is much bigger than the iPad or any one company.
Overpriced and mediocre. I could see it selling if there’s absolutely no competitions. I like how dumb people think Tablets are a new invention. No not everyone needs a camera but if u can get a similar device with a camera and other better features and save a few bucks in the process why bother with this. One thing i like about this is that other large companies seem to be afraid to use the ARM processors in tablets and mininotebooks which are going to be the future for these types of devices. I can see competitors selling the equivalent of the $700 model for about $350. Apple has potentially more to gain from these types of devices because of profits from the app. store. Think it needs a large price drop, and an sd-card slot would be nice or it will be crowded out by the competition
Sorry, but you don’t get the point.
It’s not about how much tech is inside this device.
It’s about providing a device with very easy working software = apps. No hassles = e.g. no daily updates for your OS and your antivirus software and all the other annoying stuff.
It’s about providing a device as easy as possible with as much fun as possible.
Finally! Someone nails the essence of why the iPad has a reason to exist.
Personally, I’m really amazed by the amount of hate that’s been released by the news of the iPad coming. I mean, this could only happen to an Apple product. When people don’t like the new Motorola phone, they just ignore it.
Back to your story, I had my doubts when I first saw the iPad in the newspapers the morning after the release, but slowly, it occurred to me, that something like the iPad will change interactions and location of the PC in a home and on the road.
I know many families who have a small laptop (MacBook or similar PC) around in their living room in case they want to quickly check the weather, TV-guide, which movies are playing tomorrow, a recipe, send a quick e-mail etc. etc. A laptop is simply too cumbersome and loaded with features they don’t need for those interactions. They won’t put a CD in the drive, or an USB stick… they just use the Internet.
Apple has always been about stripping down technology to a minimalist set of essential features. Simplicity has always been more important than loading something with features. And that’s the way real world people prefer it: usability over theoretical options. I believe that most tech-geeks are over-focussed on features, features, features. Yet they forget that being able to do something isn’t worth a thing, if people can’t figure out how.
@Zac said “A keyboard is undeniably more efficient, so who’s to say that iPad is “easier” to use if the person using it isn’t even proficient with a real keyboard? There are far more important things a middle aged mother should spend $500-$800 of EXTRA money on if she already has a laptop or desktop sitting in the living room. Sit down and learn how to use technology that’s been the same for almost a decade now.”
I need to respectfully disagree on two points.
First, a keyboard is not undeniably more efficient. Perhaps it is better for the tasks it was invented for, namely to replace and improve on the typewriter as a data entry / word processing tool. QWERTY survived not because the keyboard layout is best, but because computer designers’ only objective was to improve on the aging Smith Corona with newer technology. At that juncture, there was a big lack of imagination in my opinion.
In watching the iPad demos, I was struck by fundamentally how much better it will be for page layout than a keyboard and mouse, plus how its modern multi-touch UI may in some ways actually improve something as mundane as spreadsheet editing. Similarly, on the iPhone one favorite app is Google because speaking a search phrase is so much better than typing it in, on any keyboard.
Second, I know middle aged moms who have already spent $800 – $1200 on laptop or desktop systems and guess what? They’re afraid to use them, in some cases even after attending multiple continuing education courses to overcome what should have been simple hurdles.
But their issues unfortunately were not as simple as understanding how word processors are just typewriters. There were corrupt registry entries, out-of-control antivirus software getting in the way of everything, directory messes created by special offers and other junkware that came with that $30 software program, unknown shortcuts splayed all over the desktop, perfectly usable Windows control panels disabled and replaced by some 3rd party networking utility with its own UI, or some errant “trying-to-make-things-easier” shell installed by computer manufacturers themselves.
So in the spirit of cutting one’s losses, mom now can ditch the old box, and all the cables, and the extra furniture that makes her living room look like a steno pool, and the frustration; and replace it all with one simple, portable device that she might actually enjoy using.
As much as geeks may argue against dumbing down computers, there are many desirable reasons for doing so that even geeks will understand. I think history will show that Apple got it mostly right when they chose to pre-approve iPhone Apps and secure most file management capabilities under the hood. They’ll likely start opening this up a bit, but my hope is that they continue to err on the side of caution.
100% agree…please understand that geeks and corporate are not the only targets in apples’s mind. iPad is everything about simplicity.