<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Praise of Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preview is good, but it won&#039;t display text from PDFs exported directly from Photoshop, which is very annoying since preview is so widely used, it makes exporting PDFs from Photoshop a right pain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preview is good, but it won&#8217;t display text from PDFs exported directly from Photoshop, which is very annoying since preview is so widely used, it makes exporting PDFs from Photoshop a right pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Walsh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It renders pdfs better than Adobe, it saves, it crops. I use it every day all the time. The best aplication ever!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It renders pdfs better than Adobe, it saves, it crops. I use it every day all the time. The best aplication ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane Good</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lane Good]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buttons that turn on mp3 sound files in the pdf document work well in the Acrobat Reader but are completely disabled in Preview.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buttons that turn on mp3 sound files in the pdf document work well in the Acrobat Reader but are completely disabled in Preview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Whimpey &#187; Preview</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Whimpey &#187; Preview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In praise of Preview. I couldn&#8217;t agree more with The Apple Blog&#8217;s praise of Preview. There is no preview equivalent in Windows and it&#8217;s one of those small things that makes using OS X all that much nicer. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In praise of Preview. I couldn&#8217;t agree more with The Apple Blog&#8217;s praise of Preview. There is no preview equivalent in Windows and it&#8217;s one of those small things that makes using OS X all that much nicer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jinjur</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jinjur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 02:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preview&#039;s PDF support improves significantly with every Mac OS release. Preview never will match Adobe Reader feature for feature but as someone pointed out Preview handles 95% of the PDF&#039;s you are likely to encounter.  With Leopard that might be more like 99%.  Like I said, it gets better with every release....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preview&#8217;s PDF support improves significantly with every Mac OS release. Preview never will match Adobe Reader feature for feature but as someone pointed out Preview handles 95% of the PDF&#8217;s you are likely to encounter.  With Leopard that might be more like 99%.  Like I said, it gets better with every release&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feh. I use a Mac at work and read a good number of PDFs from various sources throughout the day. And I use Acrobat.

Granted Preview is in many ways more elegant and feels &quot;lighter.&quot; But the showstopper failing for me is that full text search utterly fails in some PDFs, just zero hits in cases where Acrobat will find multiple hits. It&#039;s like the Adobe software can just find the text better.

Disclaimer, my Mac uses 10.3.8, my Acrobat Reader is 6.0.1. It&#039;s possible Preview has improved in this regard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feh. I use a Mac at work and read a good number of PDFs from various sources throughout the day. And I use Acrobat.</p>
<p>Granted Preview is in many ways more elegant and feels &#8220;lighter.&#8221; But the showstopper failing for me is that full text search utterly fails in some PDFs, just zero hits in cases where Acrobat will find multiple hits. It&#8217;s like the Adobe software can just find the text better.</p>
<p>Disclaimer, my Mac uses 10.3.8, my Acrobat Reader is 6.0.1. It&#8217;s possible Preview has improved in this regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 06:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preview is awesome, it&#039;s PDF done right.   Acrobat is incredibly slow, and the ONLY time I use it is for forms work.

Preview is set to open all PDFs on my macs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preview is awesome, it&#8217;s PDF done right.   Acrobat is incredibly slow, and the ONLY time I use it is for forms work.</p>
<p>Preview is set to open all PDFs on my macs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renderdog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Renderdog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[james is right, Preview is fast and conveneint for PDF&#039;s but very annoying with images, I have no idea how those bugs have persisted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>james is right, Preview is fast and conveneint for PDF&#8217;s but very annoying with images, I have no idea how those bugs have persisted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DAG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preview&#039;s functionality is great for most of us, but the UI needs work. A transparent, floating window ( like iPhoto ) would beat the drop menus and buttons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preview&#8217;s functionality is great for most of us, but the UI needs work. A transparent, floating window ( like iPhoto ) would beat the drop menus and buttons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couple comments regarding image resizing vs. image rescaling
You can&#039;t resize an image file in Preview. You&#039;re only able to rescale how it&#039;s viewed. It was not the intent of Preview (iPhoto, Photoshop etc can take care of that with various degrees of control).
Preview&#039;s image viewing size options are very clunky. For example: I just opened an image and it&#039;s &quot;Actual size&quot; came out to 74.9%, (and yes, my prefs are set to &quot;Default Image Scale: Default Size&quot;) when I scaled it up (command +)  I end up with 105.9% - all i want is the image 100%! I find this not only odd, but annoying. Why would any image app make it a manual effort to type in 100% just to see an image at it&#039;s actual 100% size? Any web browser can do that. Thumbs Down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple comments regarding image resizing vs. image rescaling<br />
You can&#8217;t resize an image file in Preview. You&#8217;re only able to rescale how it&#8217;s viewed. It was not the intent of Preview (iPhoto, Photoshop etc can take care of that with various degrees of control).<br />
Preview&#8217;s image viewing size options are very clunky. For example: I just opened an image and it&#8217;s &#8220;Actual size&#8221; came out to 74.9%, (and yes, my prefs are set to &#8220;Default Image Scale: Default Size&#8221;) when I scaled it up (command +)  I end up with 105.9% &#8211; all i want is the image 100%! I find this not only odd, but annoying. Why would any image app make it a manual effort to type in 100% just to see an image at it&#8217;s actual 100% size? Any web browser can do that. Thumbs Down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWalla</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DWalla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree... Preview rocks. I rarely open PDF or other image files in Photoshop or Acrobat unless I have some serious editing to do. Preview is so speedy that there isn&#039;t any need to use anything else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230; Preview rocks. I rarely open PDF or other image files in Photoshop or Acrobat unless I have some serious editing to do. Preview is so speedy that there isn&#8217;t any need to use anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No size adjustment?

So what is the option &quot;Auto-scale&quot; in its preferences for then?

Besides, I haven&#039;t found yet that control+mouse-scroll-wheel won&#039;t work for *any* screen content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No size adjustment?</p>
<p>So what is the option &#8220;Auto-scale&#8221; in its preferences for then?</p>
<p>Besides, I haven&#8217;t found yet that control+mouse-scroll-wheel won&#8217;t work for *any* screen content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Win</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Win]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might agree except for Preview&#039;s lame performance in displaying a pdf in Safari with no size adjustment so that it is readable. I don&#039;t want to download every pdf I see just to take a look at it. Fix that and I could give up Reader.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might agree except for Preview&#8217;s lame performance in displaying a pdf in Safari with no size adjustment so that it is readable. I don&#8217;t want to download every pdf I see just to take a look at it. Fix that and I could give up Reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publius</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Publius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look for Apple to buy Adobe in 2007....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look for Apple to buy Adobe in 2007&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve K.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 21:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between the built-in features of the OS X print panel to turn anything into a PDF and Preview&#039;s ability to read PDF files there&#039;s no need for Acrobat. Good riddens to bloatware!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between the built-in features of the OS X print panel to turn anything into a PDF and Preview&#8217;s ability to read PDF files there&#8217;s no need for Acrobat. Good riddens to bloatware!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fairfact</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fairfact]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/30/in-praise-of-preview/#comment-316331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been a Mac user since the debut of the original 128k machine in 1984. I run an all-Apple business, but I&#039;m no fan of Preview. I much prefer the way Adobe Reader opens and treats pages. I have Preview buried in some folder and have set Adobe Reader as my default app for opening pdf files.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a Mac user since the debut of the original 128k machine in 1984. I run an all-Apple business, but I&#8217;m no fan of Preview. I much prefer the way Adobe Reader opens and treats pages. I have Preview buried in some folder and have set Adobe Reader as my default app for opening pdf files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

