<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Image editors are the new FTP application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Fever - Today&#8217;s Top Blog Posts on Apple - Powered by SocialRank</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Fever - Today&#8217;s Top Blog Posts on Apple - Powered by SocialRank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/09/11/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Image editors are the new FTP application [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Image editors are the new FTP application [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All Night Coder - Today&#8217;s Top Blog Posts on Programming - Powered by SocialRank</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[All Night Coder - Today&#8217;s Top Blog Posts on Programming - Powered by SocialRank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/09/11/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Image editors are the new FTP application [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Image editors are the new FTP application [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter Omvlee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pieter Omvlee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/09/11/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The box-image on the top displays three apps, I think I am missing one...

Have you guys ever heard of DrawIt?
It&#039;s been around for some time now, but we&#039;re about to release version 3.0 in a few days:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://getdrawit.com/teaser/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;check it out&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The box-image on the top displays three apps, I think I am missing one&#8230;</p>
<p>Have you guys ever heard of DrawIt?<br />
It&#8217;s been around for some time now, but we&#8217;re about to release version 3.0 in a few days:</p>
<p><a href="http://getdrawit.com/teaser/" rel="nofollow">check it out</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pixelmator 1.0 ships. &#171; GracefulFlavor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pixelmator 1.0 ships. &#171; GracefulFlavor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/09/11/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] been as excited for this as I am for Skitch, even though Core Image-powered image editors are the new FTP app for OSX. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been as excited for this as I am for Skitch, even though Core Image-powered image editors are the new FTP app for OSX. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/09/11/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the answer is simple.

all the lower end image editing programs on mac suck compared to what is on windows, as ironic as that may be.

adobe won&#039;t even give us mac users the latest version of their lighter weight elements program.

paintshoppro XI on windows is quite an impressive piece of software - there is nothing comparable in that price range on the mac]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the answer is simple.</p>
<p>all the lower end image editing programs on mac suck compared to what is on windows, as ironic as that may be.</p>
<p>adobe won&#8217;t even give us mac users the latest version of their lighter weight elements program.</p>
<p>paintshoppro XI on windows is quite an impressive piece of software &#8211; there is nothing comparable in that price range on the mac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LKM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LKM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/09/11/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh Pigford wrote:
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Josh Pigford&quot;&gt;You’ll notice the article simply posed a series of questions&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes, questions such as &lt;i&gt;&quot;I think what really turns me off about all of this is that all of these image editors do, more or less, the same thing&quot;&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;&quot;Do all of these developers really believe they are bringing something new and beneficial to the table? Or is it simply a case of jumping on the bandwagon?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
Simply insisting that commenters misunderstood your article is a bit insulting. Your point is rather clear; you are turned off by these apps, and you clearly imply that developers are bringing nothing &quot;new and beneficial&quot; to the table. You&#039;re making a fair point, and you&#039;re entitled to your opinion, but many disagree. Why not discuss their opinions with them instead of claiming that you didn&#039;t really mean what you wrote?
So back to the topic, then.
I think your idea that there can be too many applications is wrong, as long as we have tools to weed them out (see: macupdate.com). The FTP market is a good example of a market which works. There are many excellent applications to choose from. There&#039;s competition. And there are a lot of crappy apps, but hopefully their devs are learning something, and maybe their next app is a contender in its area, or maybe they&#039;ll manage to turn their FTP app into the next Transmit. Who knows. But the fact that these apps are available aren&#039;t hurting my use of Interarchy, just like the fact that your blog is available doesn&#039;t hurt me when I read joelonsoftware or daringfireball.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh Pigford wrote:</p>
<blockquote cite="Josh Pigford"><p>You’ll notice the article simply posed a series of questions</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, questions such as <i>&#8220;I think what really turns me off about all of this is that all of these image editors do, more or less, the same thing&#8221;</i> and <i>&#8220;Do all of these developers really believe they are bringing something new and beneficial to the table? Or is it simply a case of jumping on the bandwagon?&#8221;</i><br />
Simply insisting that commenters misunderstood your article is a bit insulting. Your point is rather clear; you are turned off by these apps, and you clearly imply that developers are bringing nothing &#8220;new and beneficial&#8221; to the table. You&#8217;re making a fair point, and you&#8217;re entitled to your opinion, but many disagree. Why not discuss their opinions with them instead of claiming that you didn&#8217;t really mean what you wrote?<br />
So back to the topic, then.<br />
I think your idea that there can be too many applications is wrong, as long as we have tools to weed them out (see: macupdate.com). The FTP market is a good example of a market which works. There are many excellent applications to choose from. There&#8217;s competition. And there are a lot of crappy apps, but hopefully their devs are learning something, and maybe their next app is a contender in its area, or maybe they&#8217;ll manage to turn their FTP app into the next Transmit. Who knows. But the fact that these apps are available aren&#8217;t hurting my use of Interarchy, just like the fact that your blog is available doesn&#8217;t hurt me when I read joelonsoftware or daringfireball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Pigford</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Pigford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/09/11/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jorgen: Ah yes. The sensationalists have officially arrived! It&#039;s almost humorous the extremes people start spitting out before they think what they&#039;re typing. Jorgen, please reread the article (you did read it before posting your comment, didn&#039;t you?), and then stop and think. You&#039;ll notice the article simply posed a series of questions. I made absolutely no statement saying any apps shouldn&#039;t be created or that developers should stop developing. I only asked what (if any) the line is for there being too many.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jorgen: Ah yes. The sensationalists have officially arrived! It&#8217;s almost humorous the extremes people start spitting out before they think what they&#8217;re typing. Jorgen, please reread the article (you did read it before posting your comment, didn&#8217;t you?), and then stop and think. You&#8217;ll notice the article simply posed a series of questions. I made absolutely no statement saying any apps shouldn&#8217;t be created or that developers should stop developing. I only asked what (if any) the line is for there being too many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorgen Olsson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorgen Olsson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/09/11/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a consequence maybe you should end this weblog - there are already quite a few weblogs about Apple products. How many do we really need???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a consequence maybe you should end this weblog &#8211; there are already quite a few weblogs about Apple products. How many do we really need???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Fischer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Fischer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/09/11/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Do all of these developers really believe they are bringing something new and beneficial to the table? Or is it simply a case of jumping on the bandwagon?&quot;

While the author presents an interesting perspective, I disagree wholly. For starters, when I looked for an FTP app for my new Mac, I didn&#039;t think the Mac market was flooded with FTP programs. I was struck by the paucity of good options. The PC world has excellent FTP apps both free and commercial. The Mac has a handful of overpriced apps and CyberDuck. If FTP&#039;ing is your full-time job, a $40 FTP app is great, but for rare use, give me a good selection of &quot;sub-par&quot; programs to select from.

For a &quot;creative&quot; platform, it&#039;s ironic that the Mac has fewer good image editor choices than the PC. None, basically, in the hobbyist market. So my reaction to seeing these announcements was not one of doom, but &quot;It&#039;s about time.&quot; I don&#039;t know how a dark cloud is seen first rather than the silver lining.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do all of these developers really believe they are bringing something new and beneficial to the table? Or is it simply a case of jumping on the bandwagon?&#8221;</p>
<p>While the author presents an interesting perspective, I disagree wholly. For starters, when I looked for an FTP app for my new Mac, I didn&#8217;t think the Mac market was flooded with FTP programs. I was struck by the paucity of good options. The PC world has excellent FTP apps both free and commercial. The Mac has a handful of overpriced apps and CyberDuck. If FTP&#8217;ing is your full-time job, a $40 FTP app is great, but for rare use, give me a good selection of &#8220;sub-par&#8221; programs to select from.</p>
<p>For a &#8220;creative&#8221; platform, it&#8217;s ironic that the Mac has fewer good image editor choices than the PC. None, basically, in the hobbyist market. So my reaction to seeing these announcements was not one of doom, but &#8220;It&#8217;s about time.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know how a dark cloud is seen first rather than the silver lining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Halsey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy Halsey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/09/11/image-editors-are-the-new-ftp-application/#comment-323745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Saint Fnordius -- That&#039;s a good measuring stick, actually: When an app gets good CMYK support. In order to do that, you know it will involve talking to PANTONE®. PANTONE and Adobe are so close they might as well be kissing cousins; that&#039;s the point when Adobe will start playing Godfather.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Saint Fnordius &#8212; That&#8217;s a good measuring stick, actually: When an app gets good CMYK support. In order to do that, you know it will involve talking to PANTONE®. PANTONE and Adobe are so close they might as well be kissing cousins; that&#8217;s the point when Adobe will start playing Godfather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

