<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I threw up a little inside&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/10/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, do we put those &quot;Snail Inside&quot; stickers on our new Intel Macs? Does all of that tech-talk about RISC processors being so much faster no longer apply? And, will Apple feel the need for another name change when they start using AMD processors?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, do we put those &#8220;Snail Inside&#8221; stickers on our new Intel Macs? Does all of that tech-talk about RISC processors being so much faster no longer apply? And, will Apple feel the need for another name change when they start using AMD processors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doyouflip</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[doyouflip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/10/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Name is okay. It&#039;s not noticeably marked on the outside (maybe brushed below the screen), so who the hell cares?

I&#039;m excited about the machine and the entry on engadget today saying it might be able to run Vista. Of course that may mean running the risk of Windows opening the door to viruses that kill the mac side of things, but we&#039;ll see what they come up with...

Re; the 17&quot; discussion. I have a rev 1 17&quot; and it&#039;s been incredible from day 1. I was lucky enough to not experience any rev 1 issues and my battery life is still decent. That being said, I think I&#039;ll welcome the smaller footprint. The resolution will be exactly the same, so there&#039;s no loss for me there. Also, I doubt Apple will announce any other laptop products until the 15s have been shipping for at least a month.

Others:
- I use FW 400, but never used FW 800. So no loss for me there
- I never used the card slot, so no loss there
- I used S-video out, so am not sure what I&#039;ll substitute with yet
- Happy about iSight built in
- Happy about Front Row and all the other bundled sw, b/c I&#039;m still running the versions that came w/the 17&quot;
- DVD burner is still an upgrade from mine, but the dual-layer (or whatever was in the last rev) would have been nicer

Overall, I&#039;m looking forward to it and think it&#039;ll be another great machine for the next 3 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Name is okay. It&#8217;s not noticeably marked on the outside (maybe brushed below the screen), so who the hell cares?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m excited about the machine and the entry on engadget today saying it might be able to run Vista. Of course that may mean running the risk of Windows opening the door to viruses that kill the mac side of things, but we&#8217;ll see what they come up with&#8230;</p>
<p>Re; the 17&#8243; discussion. I have a rev 1 17&#8243; and it&#8217;s been incredible from day 1. I was lucky enough to not experience any rev 1 issues and my battery life is still decent. That being said, I think I&#8217;ll welcome the smaller footprint. The resolution will be exactly the same, so there&#8217;s no loss for me there. Also, I doubt Apple will announce any other laptop products until the 15s have been shipping for at least a month.</p>
<p>Others:<br />
- I use FW 400, but never used FW 800. So no loss for me there<br />
- I never used the card slot, so no loss there<br />
- I used S-video out, so am not sure what I&#8217;ll substitute with yet<br />
- Happy about iSight built in<br />
- Happy about Front Row and all the other bundled sw, b/c I&#8217;m still running the versions that came w/the 17&#8243;<br />
- DVD burner is still an upgrade from mine, but the dual-layer (or whatever was in the last rev) would have been nicer</p>
<p>Overall, I&#8217;m looking forward to it and think it&#8217;ll be another great machine for the next 3 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/10/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, for one, like the name. It has a bold and distinct sound to it. Since these are called the MacBook [i]Pro[/i], I think the iBook line may be gone too, in favor of the MacBook.

So, the MacBook and MacBook Pro series of notebooks. Steve aluded to the fact that Apple wanted to get the term &quot;Mac&quot; into these products. It&#039;s a marketing decision. Let them marlket their outstanding products. You&#039;d think that Mr. Jobs was performing a personal slight on everyone here.

Oh, and I checked out the Inspiron 9400... doesn&#039;t come with OS X, so therefore it has no hope of competing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, like the name. It has a bold and distinct sound to it. Since these are called the MacBook [i]Pro[/i], I think the iBook line may be gone too, in favor of the MacBook.</p>
<p>So, the MacBook and MacBook Pro series of notebooks. Steve aluded to the fact that Apple wanted to get the term &#8220;Mac&#8221; into these products. It&#8217;s a marketing decision. Let them marlket their outstanding products. You&#8217;d think that Mr. Jobs was performing a personal slight on everyone here.</p>
<p>Oh, and I checked out the Inspiron 9400&#8230; doesn&#8217;t come with OS X, so therefore it has no hope of competing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arjan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/10/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mmmm... why all so negative? How do you know it is junk?  When you compare the specs with a G4, how do you call a iBook? Personaly I can&#039;t wait to play with the thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmm&#8230; why all so negative? How do you know it is junk?  When you compare the specs with a G4, how do you call a iBook? Personaly I can&#8217;t wait to play with the thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mondo Dynamo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mondo Dynamo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/10/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh dear.  Oh dear oh dear oh dear. Once upon a time having an Apple laptop meant something.  Having a Powerbook was a something that set you apart from the crowd.

And now we have some bastard offspring of Wintel and Apple the macbook pro.

No high end stuff (Firewire 800, real superdrive etc.) and no Apple flair or distinction.

I was really hoping for a good new powerbook.  Instead we get some piece of wintel junk running OSX.  What is the world coming to?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear.  Oh dear oh dear oh dear. Once upon a time having an Apple laptop meant something.  Having a Powerbook was a something that set you apart from the crowd.</p>
<p>And now we have some bastard offspring of Wintel and Apple the macbook pro.</p>
<p>No high end stuff (Firewire 800, real superdrive etc.) and no Apple flair or distinction.</p>
<p>I was really hoping for a good new powerbook.  Instead we get some piece of wintel junk running OSX.  What is the world coming to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mufoxe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mufoxe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/10/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on take a look at the Inspiron 9400. It&#039;s more than comparable to any MacBook.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on take a look at the Inspiron 9400. It&#8217;s more than comparable to any MacBook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilsynet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wilsynet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/10/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The base price is very, very reasonable.  The MacBooks have the latest in discrete graphics from ATI and sport nice dual core processors from Intel.

There&#039;s nothing on Dell and HP&#039;s catalog which is competitive in the sub-2000 price range.

You can get cheap Dells with lots of video memory, but those are integrated, not discrete, graphics components.  An Intel Extreme performs considerably worse than a Mobility Radeon X1600.

Also, there isn&#039;t anything on Dell&#039;s site right now that has dual core.

If you want something to compete with the bargain priced Dells, wait for the single core iBook replacements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The base price is very, very reasonable.  The MacBooks have the latest in discrete graphics from ATI and sport nice dual core processors from Intel.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing on Dell and HP&#8217;s catalog which is competitive in the sub-2000 price range.</p>
<p>You can get cheap Dells with lots of video memory, but those are integrated, not discrete, graphics components.  An Intel Extreme performs considerably worse than a Mobility Radeon X1600.</p>
<p>Also, there isn&#8217;t anything on Dell&#8217;s site right now that has dual core.</p>
<p>If you want something to compete with the bargain priced Dells, wait for the single core iBook replacements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Creek</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Creek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/10/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the 17inch model the most popular version? I personally know more people who own the 12inch-15inch models I know 3 people who own the larger versions. The 17 inch is frickin huge. Have you ever had one sitting on your lap? It defeats the purpose of having a laptop. It takes up all your space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the 17inch model the most popular version? I personally know more people who own the 12inch-15inch models I know 3 people who own the larger versions. The 17 inch is frickin huge. Have you ever had one sitting on your lap? It defeats the purpose of having a laptop. It takes up all your space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/10/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With its 4x performance boost, not much is mentioned in the apple website about battery life.  With a dual-core intel chip, how is the battery life going to be affected?  The last round of pbooks claimed a 5.6 hour lifespan, how does the macbook pro measure up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With its 4x performance boost, not much is mentioned in the apple website about battery life.  With a dual-core intel chip, how is the battery life going to be affected?  The last round of pbooks claimed a 5.6 hour lifespan, how does the macbook pro measure up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2006/01/10/i-threw-up-a-little-inside/#comment-309202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just going to call them &#039;Books&#039;, theres no way I&#039;m telling someone the new &#039;MacBook Pro&#039; has come out. Yes it&#039;s a rubish name, but hey, it&#039;s the coolest laptop I&#039;ve ever seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just going to call them &#8216;Books&#8217;, theres no way I&#8217;m telling someone the new &#8216;MacBook Pro&#8217; has come out. Yes it&#8217;s a rubish name, but hey, it&#8217;s the coolest laptop I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

